
Halfway
through last night’s screening of The Last Airbender,
my girlfriend leaned over and whispered to me, “Will there be any 3D in
this 3D movie?”
I was relieved I wasn’t the only one.
For a little while I had wondered if I got bum glasses, or if perhaps my
depth perception had been suddenly snatched from me. But no, it was the
film. You may be paying extra money to see The Last Airbender in
3D this weekend, but that doesn’t mean you’ll be getting much of a 3D
experience.
This
seems to be the flip side of the Clash of the Titans disaster,
where the post-conversion 3D looked goofy and wrong. But at least that was 3D; Airbender looks more or less like a
completely flat film. Subtlety and nuance in 3D are to be commended, but
it would be helpful if the effect was sometimes noticeable.
Like
many other modern 3D movies, Airbender was shot to be 2D and converted
after the fact. What’s crazy about the flat 3D is that director M. Night
Shyamalan seems to have been composing his shots with great depth of
field, which should make a conversion easier. But even gimme 3D shots,
like a huge Fire Nation steam ship coming right at the camera, look just
like a 2D presentation.
Almost like a 2D presentation. As is
always the case with 3D, the picture is darker. In the case of The Last
Airbender that means the film’s colors are
constantly muted, and two major nighttime action scenes become
indistinct. It’s like watching a film through… well, a film. But a
film of grime. It’s a pain in the ass.
The up side of a 3D movie being
barely in 3D is that it doesn’t seem likely to give anyone a headache,
unless it’s from eyestrain from trying to make out what’s happening in
night shots. But from a consumer point of view, post-conversion 3D is
once again showing itself to be a terrible scam. I know that this
process can
work, but it doesn’t seem
like anyone has made it work on a film that wasn’t specifically composed
to be 3D. But good luck finding Airbender in 2D – when I thought I would have
to pay to see the film I researched where it was playing, and the 2D
version is playing almost nowhere.
I
gave up on predicting the future of the latest 3D fad after many people
told me they actually liked the
3D in Clash of
the Titans, but I can’t help but wonder if
paying extra money for a movie that is almost imperceptibly three
dimensional might not sour even those easily-pleased folks. God, I hope
so. I’m mostly done with the 3D stuff already.





36 comments
Thats really weird that you said you cant find 2D showings anyone. Over here in MN its the total opposite. There are only 2 3D screens playing this in my 50 mile radius. All are 2D. I didnt plan on seeing this movie regardless, but I thought that was odd.
So, how was the movie?
Yes and yes. At the screening I saw on Monday, everyone was thinking the same thing. But watching this, I was wondering another thing: if there was going to be any movie in this 3D movie. Pretty painful to watch. Oh well, It made me want to watch the cartoon again….
If the theaters are going to play hardball, then I'll watch it on the one place where I am assured to see it in 2D…at home.
That is Shyamalan's twist, it NEVER WAS IN 3-D!!!!!
lol at the hipsters, so eager to buy into the 3D fad.
I'm quite curious to see what Devin's review of the film is going to be. Hilarious I hope.
I actually thought the same thing about Toy Story 3. The only thing that looked 3D was the Day and Night short. I was glad I paid for the 2D and brought my own glasses because I would have been pissed if I had paid an extra $3 for nothing. It's like the studios aren't even trying to hide the fact that they're ripping everyone off. Between bullshit "3D" and ticket price hikes, no wonder people aren't going to the movies as much.
FUCK 3D MOVIES. Seriously, I paid five grand to get my eyes lasered so I wouldn't have to wear glasses to the movies, and now these assholes are forcing me to? Pretty soon there will be so few choices for non-3D screenings that you'll HAVE to suffer through the shitty 3D and its shitty glasses. I say FUCK YOU HOLLYWOOD. I hope this fad dies FAST.
^ Yeah, but at least Toy Story 3 was MADE in 3D, none of this poorly-implemented post-conversion garbage.
The real question is… Ohm who cares what the real question is. Just make Unbreakable 2 already
Actually hipsters hate 3d. They're waiting for Airbender to come out on vinyl. To pass the time, they're making jokes about bacon and fake moustaches.
Well other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how did you like the show?
Roger Ebert just absolutely stomped this movie. I dare say it is one of his angriest reviews in a long time: http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100630/REVIEWS/100639999
What a twist!
@#5: That mad genius M. Knight has done it again. A 3D movie that isn't actually 3D. Fucking brilliant!
Toy Story 3 was produced in 3D, not filmed.
Wow, I just finished reading Roger Ebert's review and he just hated this movie and had not one kind thing to say about it, or the 3D effects being used. Well, this sounds like the end of M Night Shamalaladingdong
Roger eberts review reads like he's actually watched the cartoon series and liked it. Interesting.
It really boggles my mind how otherwise extremely intelligent people are railing against a new format to tell a story: 3D. You all should be celebrating innovation, and the technology's potential, not sitting back like crotchety old men bitching about the world changing around you. There hasn't been a great deal of movies to take advantage of it, but give it time. It's really an ignorant stance to take. I think it's more rage worthy that Hollywood, this town and industry that has a reputation for being a bunch of God-less liberals, continue to cast roles inappropriate of authentic race.
I think the next Devin's Advocate should concern when studios will stop letting M. Night make movies.
At this point, as much as many of us crave an Unbreakable sequel, does anyone actually have the smallest amount of faith in Shyamalan to not ruin it?
@comment 6: haha!
The 3D in Toy Story 3 was good, it just didn't have any "throw things at the audience" moments. It was all depth, like looking through a window.
I gave up on the modern incarnation of 3D when people said they actually liked the 3D of Avatar. The cinematography was lush but the 3D came off as a bunch of planar characters and props in a deep field of view, the way I saw it. I can't imagine how bad Clash of the Titans' 3D is considering how I hear the same complaints about it, and thus have to believe The Last Airbender must completely shit the third dimension bed.
Is it possible the projectionist mistakenly showed the 2D version? It wouldn't be the first time it's happened at a screening I attended… if I had attended this screening.
#20, 3D is hardly a new format. Look it up.
One: The movie sucks a bag full of dicks.
Two: As I was watching it, I noticed that the glasses weren't even necessary half the time. I took them off at a few points, and it didn't make a difference at all.
You're aware that 3D has been around for about 150 years, right?
LOL at the cockface who thinks 3D is a "new" format.
what the hell is a "hipster" ?
I swear I thought i had been ripped of at the movie theater that i went to because the whole time i was wondering is this even in 3D? Shrek had the best 3d effects so far
3D is not new, However this latest HYPE over this incarnation of 3D is new, and Hopefully will DIE soon… However, the movers and shakers have been pushing for 3D for a while as there new and up and coming technology that will help "save the industry" (i.e. make more $$). so far it's a great way to sell movie theaters new projectors, sell movie patrons more expensive tickets, and soon to sell consumers NEW TVs and Blue-ray players. All and All, it's BULLSHIT.
@Kyle: If you paid for a 2D screening and then "brought your own glasses" then you were, in fact, watching the 2D version of Toy Story 3. The glasses aren't magical, dumbass. You need to see a 3D projection of the film to get the 3D.
You forgot Andrew Jackson’s Big Block of Cheese with nary a macaroni in sight.
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.