Sometimes okay is good enough. Predators is okay. I’m not quite convinced that’s good enough this time.
Predators doesn’t feel so much like a movie as a collection of scenes that sounded cool when Robert Rodriguez pitched them. ‘Wouldn’t it be cool to see a yakuza guy get into a samurai sword fight with a Predator?’ I imagine him asking. And yes, it is cool. But it’s cool in the way a cool t-shirt is cool: momentary, shallow and meaningless. The image is interesting, but it’s never striking. And the yakuza guy fighting the Predator? I don’t know a thing about him, and I care nothing about him.
A bunch of the toughest killers planet Earth has ever seen, veering from soldiers to psychopaths, find themselves trapped on an alien planet where the Predators are hunting them. That, essentially, is the entire film. It’s a logline as script, an excuse to hang some conceptually cool scenes together and release it under the pretense of being a movie. To be fair, the original Predator wasn’t much more in-depth, but it featured characters who popped and tough guy badass dialogue that still peppers the conversations of film geeks to this day. And it was directed with a flair for action and tension by the great John McTiernan.
Predators has none of that. There are some interesting moments sprinkled throughout, but director Nimrod Antal – of whom I have been a major supporter – seems hamstrung. The editing of the film never creates atmosphere, and too many of the scenes look like they were shot in a stand of trees down the road from someone’s house. Not every film can create the totality of an alien planet that Avatar did, but Predators’ alien planet looks more or less like a small wooded area behind a strip mall. Every now and again the camera pulls out and gives us something that almost approximates scope, but it’s too rare and never big enough.
Of course a bigger alien planet would have cost money. The entire existence of Predators is owed to the low budget aesthetic of Troublemaker Studios. But good dialogue doesn’t cost anything extra, and the film has a cast that could, conceivably, deliver some lines well. But Predators‘ script, credited to Alex Litvak and Michael Finch, doesn’t give anybody much to say (except for a moment where Walton Goggins gets to call a Predator a ‘space faggot,’ which is pretty funny). And that’s because none of the characters have any definition. The original Predator wasn’t exactly a thespian’s wet dream, but that squad of musclebound goons had personality, which is completely missing from this film. Characters here have ethnicities, not even functions. There’s a Russian, a Japanese guy, an Israeli – all of them fire shots willy nilly, without much individual style. Only Adrien Brody, as the hard nosed leader of the group, gets to be remotely functional. Every other character could have been played by anybody willing to tote the weaponry.
The set up of the film puts it at a disadvantage. Where the squad in Predator had a bond, the prey in Predators are all new to each other. But the script doesn’t try to bring them together or to create relationships; the Russian guy takes a shine to Topher Grace’s character (his big character reveal is so painfully obvious from the beginning that I actually got mad at the movie for waiting so long to tell it without even bothering to try and slightly convince me it wasn’t what I knew it was), but there’s no relationship there, no interplay. It’s a way to move the Russian guy into his death scene.
Which, by the way, should be a great death scene. But without my ability to give the slightest shit about the guy, and with Antal bizarrely incapable of creating any tension, it falls flat. Conceptually it’s cool. In execution it’s just sort of there. And that’s the entire movie in a nutshell.
Adrien Brody is better than I expected in the lead role, but he has nothing to do except give semi-tactical information. The script doesn’t give him an arc; he has a sudden character reversal at the end of the movie, but it doesn’t grow organically out of anything. He does get to smear mud on himself, one of a thousand little callbacks to the first film that don’t work, and often don’t make sense (the ultimate of which is the inclusion of Long Tall Sally on the closing credits – a truly nonsensical bit of fanservice). Brody gets to look tough, and he’s more pumped than we’ve ever seen him, but it’s not a character that he’s playing. It’s not even an archetype.
Predators isn’t terrible, but it’s not particularly good either. There’s a scene at the end where two Predators fight, and I don’t really know why they do. It’s just cool to see two Predators fight, I guess. One Predator is kind of a good guy Predator, and the other is a new-model, badder ass Predator, and when the good guy Predator died my biggest reaction was ‘That scene is now over.’ The fight was fine. Antal didn’t bring any particular flourish to it, but he also didn’t fuck it up in any noticeable way. It was a basic, barebones realization of two Predators fighting. But that’s what you do with action figures, not with movies. A movie needs stakes, it needs characters, it needs something more than good feelings generated by a ‘back to the roots’ approach. I wasn’t dying to get out of Predators, and it passed the time in a not unpleasant way, but it’s not a real movie, and it’s not something I ever need to think about ever again.
6.5 out of 10





33 comments
exactly
I liked it, a solid 3/5 if I had to put a number to it. I honestly didn't see Topher's character reveal coming since it didn't seem like the kind of flick you really have to pay attention to. I also
A very accurate review. Predators was another missed opportunity. Some cool ideas, a mess of a film for several reasons that Devin pointed out.
What really bothered me was the film fell apart right after the first act. The Predators are supposed to be the galaxies best hunters, but are easily dispatched. The worst of which was the "final" predator stomping his was through scenes with zero agility, then beating confused by convenient patches of fire, ultimately beaten up by the bare hands of Adrien Brody. (a fucking disgrace of a villian)
"A movie needs stakes, it needs characters, it needs something more than good feelings generated by a 'back to the roots' approach."
Strangely, that's how I felt about Inception.
Fair review. ***SPOILER*** Another thing that irked me is the last two predator deaths are both beheadings. Really, they couldn't have been more creative? Even just having that hatchet buried in the skull of the last one would have been cooler than essentially having the same kill twice in a row.
Yeah, the movie wasn't good. It SHOULD have been considering it was made at Troublemaker studios and mostly out of Fox's meddling clutches, but it wasn't. That's what makes Predators even worse than it already is. It SHOULD have been a fucking home run. Good director, great cast and a supportive producer. Instead we got Predators that don't hunt and get taken out like chumps by uninteresting human characters. Fuck this movie.
Spot on Devin, couldnt agree more, had no real interest in seeing this, then read the first CHUD reviews and thought Id check it out, but it was dull as dishwater, I swear half the movie was just shots of the group walking. More Larry would've been good but I dont think even that wouldve helped. Still it was better than the abysmal AvP films. Good to see Ol' Painless again…
Yeah, its not a great film, but I think your criticism is pretty harsh. If you didn't understand why the Predator showdown was at the end then you weren't paying attention to the bare-bones plot, but there was a reason given and set up from around the mid-way point…
You'll totally see this again on TV or something. I think in this case "okay" is acceptable, because it draws it's line to Predator through Predator 2. And while I'm not a huge fan of P2, neither that nor this leave me with the feeling of being utterly fucked over in the way the AvP films do. Predators is flawed and has a few scenes worthy of the AvP/Darkhorse Clearance Bin approach to the property, but I didn't feel like I was being "faked-out" by the filmmakers. Like Sherlock Holmes, it's a promising start but they need to follow it up with something of a higher standard now they've marked out their territory.
Very well articulated – saw this last night and couldn't quite put my finger on it – but you nailed it. Still I was a little bit more generous for 2 reasons – its still the best predator movie in a very long time and the oirginal was excellent even though it had no right to be.
I nearly burst out laughing in the cinea when A Brody popped up covered in mudd!:-) – he looked so ridiculess and reminded me on one of those spoofs for the MTV movie awards!.
As a big fan of the original film, I found Predators to be very average and a bit of a wasted opportunity.
I pretty much agree with you on EVERYTHING. They should of done the reveal sooner. Kinda pissed about the russians death scene, he was a) one of the only personalities and b) one of the only names we actually learn. I can go into more what I didn't like. I could go into how Forrester Whitaker would of been fucking great, if only he didnt drop out. But Alas.
and yes the best scene was was the birds eye view of the yakuza/predator fight. Beautiful, relatively speaking.
This i s exactly what I figured Predators would be like. A fanwank by the hack Rrrrrodriguez. Maybe worth a download on a slow day, but in theaters? Fuck no.
Predators sucked. I'm so pissed I wasted 2 hrs and $11 on this piece of crap. Devin thank you for at least being sensible in admitting that its not very good.
Certain other sites who shall not be named pegged this movie as the second coming of jesus.
you really don't know why the two Predators duke it out at the end? I thought it was clear the bigger "super" Predators hunt the smaller "classic" Predators. A blood feud is even mentioned. Obviously, the classic Predator was humiliated by being captured and strung up, so when Royce cut him down, he had his second chance to take out his captor and redeem himself. Maybe I'm way off base but that's what I think.
Wait…did you say something positive about "Avatar" in there? Interesting. I loved the first film and saw it opening day in 87. Loved the 2nd film and thought it was unfairly maligned back in 90, but I have no desire to see this, which is strange. It feels like i've moved on from this kind of film, like it's a movie for my 15 year old self, not my 38 year old self.
This sums it up nicely. I honestly didn't understand why any of the references to the first film were made. The film was oddly scored, too. None of the cues made any sense. And it really bothered me how quickly their situation was pieced together given the scope the film was going for.
I saw it last monday during a matinee, and feel the exact same way devin. As a way to kill time until my girlfriend's flight came in, it was just fine, but it didn't thrill me the same way the first two films did. That being said, a lot of Robert Rodrequez dorky filmgeek predictions in the story worked better than I thought they did. I expected the yakuza to be groan inducing, but he worked, maybe its because he's as vague as you say. I dunno.
I take it it is at least an improvement over both of the lousy AvP movies, though? How does it fair in comparison with Predator 2?
It's kind of telling that the only notable thing my friends and I took away from the movie is the hilarious line "5 o'clock… Bitch Raping Time." As horrible as it is… it's the best and most memorable thing in the whole movie.
It's explained by Fishburne's character that there are two species of Predator which have been blood-feuding for ages. That's why the two Preds fight at the end.
It was just a 100 minute reference to Predator but it was still 100 times better than AvP and it's sequel.
You nailed it. I felt the same way watching the movie.
what a surprise you didn't like it.
now i know why i did.
a very impartial review like always.
Wow, it's like you went into my brain and ripped this review right from it, as I agree with almost every point made here. I kept hearing that the film was the first "true" sequel to PREDATOR (presumably because it's set in a jungle and has all those callbacks that Devin mentions) but I actually enjoyed both PREDATOR 2 and ALIENS VS. PREDATOR: REQUIEM more than I did this film. Plus, the film is brought to a painful, grinding stop with the introduction of Laurence Fishburne's character. When this movie was first in pre-production, word was that the directors were down to Antal and Neil Marshall. I think Marshall would've brought this whole movie up a notch or ten, especially with a re-write on the script. Just watch DOG SOLDIERS (or THE DESCENT) and tell me that his version of PREDATORS wouldn't have been completely badass.
" Adrien Brody as the hard-nosed leader of the group" Ha! great subtle probiscus reference.
I think a more interesting Predator movie would be to have a bunch of normal civilians being hunted by Predators. Then you'd actually have some suspense and a rooting interest.
What happened to McTiernan? Dang, his Thomas Crown Affair was terrific…
Somehow this is about what I was expecting. When I first saw that Walter Goggins and Topher Grace were in it, I thought it had potential. (Not that Grace has done much in films, but Goggins is absolutely fucking fantastic!) They should have just let the actors know the basic plot and have them make up all their dialogue. Maybe that should be the next strategy for a film, just write a general plot and let a bunch of good actors make it up as they go along.
Good god this movie was absolute dog shit. It may have even been worse than the last AvP with all the high school kids running around earth ruining a once great franchise. Nothing about this movie was worth it…the characters were all horrible people,the script was garbage,and it did indeed look like it was shot in RR's backyard. I've seen fanfilms that were better made. Everyone involved should be ashamed of this cinematic abortion,and we must all never speak of it again.
Overall I think the film did out do its predecessors, mind you as you mentioned it wasn't that great. You are right about the ethnicity points.
But there are sooo many retarded things that happen in the film its just not logical. And for somone directing a sci-fi movie they didn't really have very good imaginations did they?
For example, you have a sniper that instantly shoots her LONG RANGE rifle aiming down a scope at the little triceratops looking things from about two yards away without even adjusting her scope. Looking down that lense would have been like putting a magnifying glass up to your eye.
Another retarded part of the film, you get a legendary actor Laurence Fishburne in that film, who has predator armour on and knows how to use it. FOR THE LOVE OF GOD does that not even spark potential for a better storyline there!!!??? I mean why not base the film around his series of events that lead to him going insane as he's trapped there and killing off Predators with their own weapons.
Further more even when he is killed off (like a girl i mite add) why don't they take his predator armour??? That just dumb that'd be the first thing you pick up.
Ok so the prisoner takes the anti thermal flak jacker but still, the invisibility cloak and a pulse rifle???
Also regarding your point about the storyline where the two predators in the film fight. It is mentioned that by laurence that there are two conflicting tribes in the jungle. On high ground are the royal predators (the new one) and down below are the normal ones.
From that you can conjure up the blood fued implied. The yakuza fight is cool but why does every RLI good predators fight end up with the cool but would it not have been better to have had a ninja???
Scenarios are endless, the acting wasn't that bad but the film lacked depth and the ending was just irritating. The end credits music just didnt fit and was retarded. Good Song but still retarded.
On the nose, man. That's exactly how I felt about it – a good way to pass the time in the theater, but nothing that particularly grabbed me.
I would like to see Royce revisited though. And I thought that it would have been better if Topher Grace's character actually was a doctor and his reason for being dropped in was to give the prey a bit more of a fighting chance; so that when they got injured the doctor would fix them up so that they could hunt longer.
Why do people expect so much from movies these days they expect it to give them a orgasm or something while they watch it . this movie is great and people expect way to much
i have to agree with benji. although i would probably give it a 6.5 like devin, i actually enjoyed it quite a bit. then again, i was expecting a lot worse going in. moral of the story: expectations (of a predator movie no less) lead to disappointments.
Not sure if it was mentioned, but the actual reason there is a blood feud is that the bigger predators are a hybrid Alien/Predator and they're trying to wipe out the pure blood predators. If you remember the end of AVP, one of the dead predators were impregnated by an Alien, that was the beginning of the "super predators"
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.