Film: Following (1998)
The Principals: Christopher Nolan (dir), Jeremy Theobald, Alex Haw, Lucy Russell, John Nolan
The Premise:
A man who fills his time and seeks out inspiration by following random strangers, finds himself in trouble when he breaks one of his strict rules. He becomes wrapped up a with a thief and a mysterious woman in a story that plays out in a short, noir-styled film that gives us a look at what was knocking around Nolan’s head as he was just starting.
Is It Good: Fairly good. While Nolan shares humble, low-budget, high-contrast 16mm beginnings with other auteurs like Aronofsky and Scorsese, Following is not quite as stylistically explosive an introduction as Pi, or as personal and guilt ridden as Who’s That Knocking at My Door?. That said, it is a small, sharp, and tight film that in hindsight subtly hints at the kind of filmmaker Nolan would become.

Watched in a vacuum rather than as the foundationary work of an eventual blockbuster auteur, Following remains a solid neo-noir with a sturdy script. The acting and cinematography reflect the limited budget and spread-out production schedule, but they work at least well enough to keep the moody story going.
Is It Worth A Look: Considering how easily available it is on Netflix’s Instant Watch service (recently appreciated by Mr. Butler), it is worth the time- but mostly as an early-Nolan curiosity than a groundbreaking piece of filmmaking. By 1998 non-linear narratives had been churned through the grinder pretty thoroughly, and in Following it does little more than obliquely obscure and tease pieces of the puzzle. Nolan would make much more effective use of non-traditional structure in his first budgeted film Memento, as well as Batman Begins and The Prestige later.

Besides the obviously chopped up narrative (and the more trivial references mentioned below), Nolan displays other interests in Following that would show up and be explored later in his work. His love for James Bond is apparent in the suave, well dressed, and quick-witted thief, Cobb (ahem), while his love for the vulnerable detective type is evident in the young man. Rules and the consequences of breaking them, cruel exploitation of the uninformed, and a fascination with unfamiliar surroundings are all themes that flow in the blood of Nolan’s work, and they strongly drive Following.

It’s most incredible to think that there is only a ten year span of Nolan’s career between this incredibly small, almost new wave in its primitiveness film, and one of the largest and most successful blockbusters ever filmed, which would then be followed by one of the most satisfying and daring blockbusters to make its way through Hollywood. Inspiring to say the least.
Random Anecdotes: There are a number of cute allusions to Following including the recycled name noted above, and the return of a prop clock in Memento. The funniest by far is the prominent appearance of a Batman sticker on a door, a fortuitous coincidence if there ever was one.







5 comments
I think Nolan is the second coming. He can even see the future. Maybe we're all living in his dream.
I watched this movie on Netflix the week before Inception and I thought it was very good…especially for a low-budget film. I actually liked it much better than the overhyped "Pi", and even though it's obviously a more amateur production, it still sits well next to Memento and Nolan's other films. The twists and plot revelations are well-done, and the non-linear structure is fascinating. I find that it makes the viewer even more a part of the experience as they basically have to put the story together themselves. I also caught the Batman reference, which was funny because I re-watched Memento right after Following, and there's a scene where Guy Pearce passes a tattoo shop that has a Batman logo on the outside. Almost like it was destined for Nolan to be part of the Batman franchise. (P.S. When will the damn verification field start working correctly? It's getting rather annoying.)
Great film, definitely worth a watch.
YES. and I just happen to have it around here so.. I'll be watching it soon!
What this film above all else is a textbook example of how to make a film with NO money – it really is a home movie – but done with a massive intelligence – think about it – 3 main actors (none of them particularly good but very effective as used) – location shooting – minimum running time (70 minutes) clever editing
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.