If
this all works out as hoped, we’ll all have to give serious thanks to
some random Puerto Rican film lab for being able to finally see Stanley
Kubrick’s seldom-seen, 1953 debut feature film, Fear and Desire, in all its glory.
Apparently
the negative for the film was found in the library of said film lab
that closed shop years ago, which then was screened on Sunday at the
American Cinematheque in Los Angeles. Afterward, Caroline
Frick Page, curator of motion pictures for the George Eastman House,
announced that “plans were underway to restore the film and eventually release it on home video.“
The
story goes that Kubrick did all he could to keep this movie from seeing
the light of day. Given his track record of eccentricities,
who knows what his reasons were. Personally, I dig that he was
always like that — even in the very beginning before he became the
cinematic god he ended up being. I’m sure the guy had his
reasons, whether or not we would agree with him; but for Kubrick fans,
having a rarely seen entry in his canon fall into their laps like this
would be manna from heaven.
Page says that “[r]estorations are a very expensive process, but it’s one of those things
that I actually think would be great to have a collaboration on that
particular title, to see what can be done.”
This
is one of those things that blows me away — that film labs can have
total treasures in their possessions and just not even realize
it. I just picture these cans of film stacked up in a dusty
backroom of a film lab, no labels, no organization whatsoever,
accumulated over years and years of screening, cutting, and processing
celluloid, wasting away, hoping to be discovered. And I wonder
what the digital equivalent will be in the future. Someone
finds a lost work of art on a random, thought-to-be-wiped DVR?
No
word on how long before we could hope to see this released.
At least we now know it’s in the works and, since it is Kubrick, it’ll
be well worth the wait.
Source | The Wall Street Journal – Speakeasy
3 comments
Kubrick was a genius of film and his public works should be treasured, studied, and preserved for all time, but if the man didn't want this film to be released, shouldn't his wishes be honored?
Unlike most directors, Kubrick was fully capable of not only critiquing the quality of his own work but knowing what was worthy for public consumption and what wasn't. Just because he's dead doesn't mean we should have a free-for-all to dig through his dirty laundry unearthing every tidbit to feast on.
Just because they can make a buck off this doesn't mean they should, or that you automatically have the right to own it.
Scarecrow Video in Seattle, Washington has it. It's cool to see, it's very, very low-budget, but there are definite scenes and shots and flashes of the genius that he would become. But I do agree 100% with Jack, he didn't like it, he didn't want it released, it shouldn't be released. Seeing as how it does EXIST, it's neat to have to hunt it down to see it, but it doesn't need to be readily available at Walmarts around the country.
I've only seen inferior copies so it would be interesting to finally see a pristine print of it. Kubrick's The Seafarers made its way onto DVD recently (Amazon.com), so hopefully this one will as well; just to round out the collection!
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.