

The Film: Conan the Destroyer (1984)
The Principals: Arnold Schwarzenegger, Grace Jones Wilt Chamberlin, Olivia d’Abo, Mako.
The Premise: After ridding Cimmeria of Thulsa Doom in the previous adventure, Conan is now tasked by a Queen to escort a young princess, as she attempts to recover a powerful jewel only she can touch. Part two of the mission is to have the princess also get the horn from an ancient god, but unknown to Conan and his crew the Queen intends to have them all killed upon their successful return, and then sacrifice the princess to the god Dagoth!

Is it Good: In no way whatsoever can this film be considered the slightest bit entertaining; it’s a complete pile of fantasy trash. Even if you were to try and file it under “guilty pleasure”, you’d still have to fulfill the ‘pleasure’ aspect.
All of the goodwill and acclaim Conan the Barbarian received upon its release was single handedly wiped away when this rotten item debuted. Because the first film had been so successful, both Universal Studios and producer Dino De Laurentiis believed it would have made even more had it been PG-13 instead of the R rating it got. So, for the sequel they insisted the violence and sex be toned down to the point of not even being present, and a more comical and kid-friendly script was commissioned.
To say it was a total disaster is true, except at the box office – where it grossed $31 million domestically against its $18 million budget.
But enough about money, the film is in every other way space poop. The acting is abominable, as Sarah Douglas camps it up so much as the villain you almost expect her to burst into song. Arnold is bored out of his brain, and clearly misses the energy and direction John Milius would have given him. Grace Jones is Grace Jones, and was only using this film as a tune up for her next affront in A View to a Kill the year later. Olivia d’Abo was about -4 years old when she made this, so she gets a pass. She’s awful, but when you’re a young actress and every one around you is horrid, that kind of thing has to have a negative effect on you.
Even Basil Poledouris’ score is uninspired. Whereas it was a massive highlight in Barbarian (and one of my all-time favorite soundtracks), here it sounds like he was cashing in the checks while composing. It’s overly bombastic and too jaunty at times, and it should have been one of the only reasons to see the film, but like so much from this movie it crumbles under the weight of its predecessor.
Is it worth a look: No. Not even if you’re drunk and/or dying. Go watch The Ghoulies instead.

Random Anecdotes: If only Milius had done this film, we might be talking about one of the best two action movies of the 1980’s. The original script by Gerry Conway and Roy Thomas was said to be more aligned with Barbarian, but with more sorcery. They were trying to steer the movie more towards the writing of Robert E. Howard, with less emphasis on Viking motifs. However, their script was stripped down and butchered and all that was left were the sorcery elements, which the production used to campy and terrible results. The writers finally had their work published in 1990 as Conan: The Horn of Azgoth, so if you’re ever wondering how The Destroyer might have looked check it out.





19 comments
Fuck you Steve Murphy! Conan the destroyer is better than 99% of the barbarian movies out there. Just because you don't "get" the genre does not mean you have to bash it.
100% nailed it. The movie was horrible whereas the original was fun with a sex and violence.
I also agree 100% that the score from Barbarian is one of the best ever. It set the tone for each scene better than almost any other movie.
Destroyer was trash in every possible category.
wow, steve you were really off with this one …its not as gritty or thematically satisfying as "conan the barbarian", but it has WAY better action scenes and it is a good continuation of the story started in "barbarian"
Destroyer IS trash, but to say it's not even the "slightest bit entertaining" is just….weird.
I disagree. Compared to some of the otehr crappy sword and sorcery/fanstasy movies that came out during this period, Conan the Destroyer is a masterpiece. Granted, it is nothing compared to Barbarian, but it is definetely a guilty pleasure of mine and Ursa was looking hot.
Oh god, Chudfan is the worst possible being I ever pulled out of my hellcunt.
If you look carefully toward the end you do get to see unintentional Sarah Douglas side-bush, even in the cable edit. That's something, at least…
I hate to say it, but for once I have to agree with Chudfan. While clearly not the masterpiece the first film is, "Destroyer" definitely works as a fun, action-fantasy flick. I recently bought it for super-cheap because my girlfriend, even though she is a super Arnie fan, had never seen it; just the first one. Watching it again was fun and Basil's score is bright and anthemic, not jaunty. Not to get off a tangent, but speaking of Basil's great scores and movies I just showed my GF for the first time, can I get a little love for Quigley Down Under? Tom Selleck fans raise up! (oh yeah and the captcha systems BLOWS)
When you come to a website called CHUD (maybe Steve Murphy never saw that one?), you'd think the reviewer would appreciate the finer aspects of cheese, especially when he throws out that you can't even enjoy Destroyer with booze!?! Is it the Conan sequel we all wanted…? Sheeyut no! But it's still Arnold in the 80s fighting wizards in ice castles and Andre the Giant dressed up like a horn monster. Don't know who Chudfan is, but I agree: Fuck you, Steve Murphy!
I'm sorry but 99% of the "barbarian movies" out there do suck. Badly. The shit that floats near the top is still shit and this flick was shit. My Robert E. Howard fandom was ass-raped when this movie came out. Generally we'd compare a sequel to it's predecessor first, and here this pile falls far short. Then we move on to other films of the genre: can we place it on the same level as The Sword & the Sorcerer? Can we place it that high?!? The cast certainly doesn't elevate it. They were all on a Sunday stroll… through a movie. I can't even make it through this if it's on TNT and I have a hangover so bad it hurts to work the remote.
"Barbarian" is absolute greatness. I remember seeing it when I was 5 at a drive-in, definitely a formative experience for an impressionable mind. I always kinda liked "Destoyer" too, even tho as a kid I could tell it was significantly inferior to Barbarian. Its definitely not a piece of cinematic art like Barbarian but it still remains a very guilty pleasure. Next they'll be saying Red Sonja was a complete waste too. Blasphemers!
"Because the first film had been so successful, both Universal Studios and producer Dino D Laurentiis believed it would have made even more had it been PG-13 instead of the R rating it got."—The PG-13 rating didn't even exist yet, in either case. The PG-13 rating was first announced just days after "Destroyer" (rated PG) was released, and the first PG-13 film ("Red Dawn") would come along a few months later. Also, it's De Laurentis, not just the letter D. It isn't an initial. Sloppy…
It's definitely not good, but oddly it's much more true to the original Conan stories – which aren't very good themselves.
I can't defend the movie itself, because it IS trash…..but your assessment of Basil's score is WAAAAY off. He killed it.
Is "Chudfan" just a name people use when they're the first to comment on an article? I'm gonna start stealing it, and doing HILARIOUS things with it.
Alternatively – try the Horn of Azoth as the Horn of Azgoth doesn't exist. Conan the Desttroyer isn't great but it's mighty thews higher than any of the Deathstalker, Beastmaster or even Sword and the Sorcerer and Poledouris' score is still excellent
Tried to watch this again a few months ago and I gotta say- Murphy's dead-on. I actually couldn't get through it. Just embarrassing.
Toned down the violence? Sure, there was less blood slinging about, but I showed the first scene to my wife to say how if the opening scene were in a movie these days, it'd be automatic "R" rating. Conan kills like twenty people in the first few minutes of the movie, which was much more than in Barbarian, but the violence is LESS? Plus, I don't remember anything all that sexual in Barbarian. A nude chick in a cage, Conan boning Valeria with no nudity, and some chick strapped to a post before the final confrontation. Seriously? That was sexual? And for the one pair of tits you see, Conan COVERS HER UP.
They're both shit. Both movies completely butchered the novels for material and nowhere is the actual Conan found in these films. Arnold fucking cries like a little bitch for fuck's sake. Conan does not fucking cry. EVER!
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.