When a studio gets excited about a project in the early scripting stages, rarely is it a good thing for film fans. It generally means they’ve been able to save tons of money by forcing someone somewhere to compromise, and what happens is either the film languishes in development hell – or the finished product is a shadow of what it could have been.
Hopefully, that will not be the case with the Alien prequel.
While reports that Ridley Scott was touting a return to the “nasty… R-rated” roots of the first two films, the budget he was throwing around was in the $150 million neighborhood; enough to send 20th Century Fox running in terror. What the studio needed was a new script that stripped down much of the action (and thereby the budget), and now a report from Vulture indicates that they may have found exactly what they’ve been looking for.
A treatment by Lost co-creator Damon Lindelof has been turned in, and reportedly the studio is thrilled with it. Supposedly it is toned down in terms of large sets and expensive effects that would eat the budget away, and focuses more on the creepy atmosphere of the original (a good thing), allowing for more creativity on the part of the filmmaker. So happy is Fox that they’re now talking about a possible PG-13 rating for the prequel (a bad thing), something that sounds absurd considering the violent pedigree of its predecessors!
Now with a script they like, Fox has interest in either Natalie Portman or Noomi Rapace (The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo) as the lead, being described as a tough Colonial Marine General.
So now we wait to find out Scott’s reaction to the script and whether or not he’d be remotely interested in delivering a PG-13 Alien picture, especially after telling everyone who would listen how he’d like it to be “really tough, really nasty”.





26 comments
Rememeber how well the PG-13 Aliens Vs Predator did?
Wasn't Scott chasing a $250m budget? 150 doesn't seem outlandish to me when it's got the Alien name on it and Scott attached.
Natalie Portman as a tough marine general. After all, she was so convincing as a intergalactic senator. Jesus Christ, who comes up with this shit?
This is going to be fucking retarded.
Give me a break. Even if it is PG-13, they can get away with quite a bit and you know you'll all see it any way.
Although I do wonder if these studios even know who they're making movies for anymore – especially FOX. I'm tired of this middle of the road shit.
Wtf is wrong with Fox or any film compnay in America?
You can bring a fucking 3 year old into an R rated film ( i think ).
The rating never alienates anyone,
Does the under 17 market really hold that strong?
Why subject a film to a tone it never had in the first place by cutting out the adult material the franchise is known for?
These studios seem to treat the R rating like its a rating for fucking racists or something.
I'll tell you what will happen – Scott will quit the project in disgust and Fox will bring in a Brett Ratner or McG to do it. I fucking hate Fox. They have butt fucked this franchise into oblivion.
Given that the PG-13 AVP was one of the most successful films in the whole series, you can't really fault their business sense. And honestly, it's not Fox's fault that the idea of getting mouth-raped by a facehugger and then having an alien burst out of your chest as you die is no longer automatically considered R-rated fare. It should be, but somehow it isn't. Beyond that, go back to Aliens and review how much blood is in it… the answer is "very, very little." AVP actually has more blood than Aliens.
further proof that Ridley Scott blows….
Everything about this project so far (bar Scott's involvement) says "Run Away Now!". This will be another Phantom Menace, a Chrystal Skull. Let the past be the past and go on developing some Original projects. For the exec reading this, here is the meaning of the word original: "Not derived from something else; fresh and unusual … Productive of new things or new ideas; inventive"
Scott has said on numerous occasions that he'll deliver the movie that the studio wants cause he wants the movie to be successful so he can keep making movies. Hopefully somethings changed since then since alien was one of the greats and he doesn't want to tarnish that but the past doesn't suggest it
I wonder what rating the orignal would have received today? You don't really see much of anything except in the chestbuster scene. If they don't try to show any boobies or continually use the C word then they might be able to swing a few gorey moments in. I hope they see sense and let it be R Rated, I for one would pay to see that.
Granted, the original would not carry an R-rating were it released today. But this is not the original they're making. Every sequel, good or bad, was its own kind of film. Considering the way they're hyping this one as an epic fest of nastiness, anything less than an R-rating would be a huge disappointment. I personally would not go see it in theaters, Ridley Scott or no Ridley Scott. And I pray I'm not the only one.
I sure as hell hope Fox opt for quality over ticket sales in this case. Lower budget, keep violence. Compromise, you suit-wearing millionaire cocksuckers.
As simplistic as it sounds if Fox is involved its just not going to be good. This current regime is the very definition of bland.
Fox plans to release some more absolute Alien tripe..Is what this story should be titled..Garbage Colonial Marines?…Really they can't do better than that?
@#8: sources on those BO numbers please. You're forgetting tone/context regarding ratings also. AvP gets PG13 because the violence is contextually/tonally without any weight (suitable for immature teens). Scott was talking about bringing back the challenging tone/context of the violence and psychologically loaded imagery of the first movie. The liquid measurement of the on-screen viscera is irrelevant. But I've failed to get through the ultra tedious Robin Hood twice now, so even Scott's involvement wasn't a rock solid guarantee of this project reaching the heights of the original.
Why, oh why, is Fox run by a bunch of numbnuts? And why do they own so many of my favorite franchises? It just ain't fair.
PG-13?
I feel saddened by this news.
The stupidity of the thinking behind this gives me a headache.
FUCK FOX!!!
Should be Rated R. Should star Ellen Page. Should NOT be in 3D. That is all.
"you know you'll all see it any way." —
Funny, that's what I heard about REVENGE OF THE FALLEN. Never saw it. Heard it about THE CLONE WARS. Never saw it. Heard it about RISE OF THE SILVER SURFER. Never saw it. So, apparently you don't know shit about fuck all.
Comment #21—"Revenge of the Fallen", while an awful film, still made 400 million without you. If any of those other films weren't AS successful, it's because mainstream audiences weren't in as much of a hurry to check them out. From working at both a movie theater and comic store, I've learned that the word of most angry film & comic geeks in regards to things they'll "never" see (and I'm sure there ARE a few exceptions) cannot be trusted. They're the ones bitching the hardest, but then they're also the only ones there for the opening weekend of "Jonah Hex". They'll say that something looks stupid, they'll pay to see it, and then they'll say how stupid it was. For the most part, they never really stick to their guns on anything they complain about.
Remember how Alien: Resurrection sucked your asshole? That was because they took a great script by Joss Whedon and said, "Good work! Now cut out all the cool action sequence and cut out the big battle on a snow-capped mountaintop with a giant albino alien and replace it with a half-human alien turning into space sausage. Perfect!" You can read the original screenplay, and which if shot as written (by a director who knows how to shoot action sequences) I believe would have rivaled Cameron's Aliens in quality: http://www.script-o-rama.com/movie_scripts/a/alien-resurrection-script-screenplay-whedon.html
PG-13?? Why not have Pixar do it. Then they can sell as a coming of age story to families. Some movies must be Rated R to work. The Alien movies need to be R.
Whatever happened to R-rated movies that only cost 100 million dollars? They used to make those all the time. It seems to me that that should be the ceiling to the budget here and thus it could still be R-rated and intense and as good as most of the previous R-rated Alien entries. To me, sounds like a reasonable investment. Just forget the 3-D part and plan a second prequel but don't include that in your first budget and everything is solved. This is the first real chance to restore some legitimacy to the Alien series and Fox had better not fuck this shit up.
Ridley Scott blows, eh? I guess you're one of the many blind fanboys who salivated and masturbated to that crap job AvP.
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.