Megamind speaks to the biggest problem with DreamWorks Animation: they’re as unreliable as an alcoholic father at Christmas. With each film you don’t know if you’re coming downstairs to find a house full of gifts or bupkis. DreamWorks began by chasing after the success of early 90’s Disney with a series of animated films that left everyone wanting (ooh, Prince of Egypt… Road to El Dorado!) But it was Shrek and the move to computer generated animation that showed they could be the Warner Brothers to Pixar’s Walt Disney. They could be Michael Jackson to Pixar’s Prince (Shrek 2 is still the most successful animated film ever made). The Poison to Pixar’s Motley Crue. They may not have the heart, but they could – at their best – tweak pop culture enough to be successful with both children and parents.
But even when they’re good, they’re never consistent. They don’t have the quality control that the Pixar factory has. And even with the improvements of Kung Fu Panda and How to Train Your Dragon, Megamind falls into the misfire pile. This is unfortunate, because there are a lot of great ideas in the film, and a lot of talented performers.
Will Ferrell stars as Megamind, an alien sent to Earth as his planet is dying. Yep, just like Superman. But at the exact same time he’s sent to earth, so is Metro Man (Brad Pitt), who is the actual Superman surrogate. And from the moment Metro Man lands he bumps Megamind away from the nice family, and into a prison. The two grow up together; Megamind practices his smarts while Metro flies and charms everyone with his effortless skills as an ubermensch. The film has a really strong hook – everyone’s been around someone who seems to get everything without having to work for it and Megamind’s jealousy and hatred is empathetic. Megamind has no real friends besides his fish-like sidekick Minion (David Cross), and he grows up to be an arch villain, while Metro Man has no problem keeping the big city safe from Megamind. Ace reporter Roxanne Ritchi (Tina Fey) is often kidnapped by Megamind and rescued by Metro Man – everyone thinks they’re dating – while her cameraman Hal (Jonah Hill) has a not-so-secret crush on her.
To review this film there’s some first act spoilers: After Metro Man is presented with a tremendous statue in his honor, Megamind captures Metro Man, and it seems copper is his kryptonite. Having finally found Metro Man’s weakness, Megamind then blows up Metro Man’s location.
So, it’s a comic book movie told from the villain’s perspective, but one in which he wins early on. This opens up a very interesting question: What would a Lex Luthor do with no more worlds to conquer? (Of course, the real answer is “kill all the ______s”, but that’s not this film) Here Megamind is superficially happy, but unsatisfied because he was so used to his Sisyphean struggle. At first he starts hanging out with Roxanne in disguise, and she admits that she and Metro Man – even though he constantly rescued her – had zero chemistry together (the sexual subtext of this is never dealt with). This leads to Megamind romancing Roxanne under that disguise, and also lightening up. But he needs a nemesis, so he clones Metro Man’s powers from a piece of his dandruff (Hey, Superman IV references) and zaps Hal, who he then trains under the guise of Marlon Brando (they don’t shirk away from their obvious references). But Hal, renamed Titan – has no interest in truth, justice, and the American way, and so he quickly descends into arch villainy himself. The Brando stuff is where the film shows its weaknesses – it’s not a particularly funny joke, so it’s more a reference for people who remember a 30 year old movie. I guess the character’s short and lispy.
Megamind has all the elements of what could make for a pretty great movie, but it’s lacking narrative drive or invention – I kept waiting for it to be fun. The core conceits are wonderful for comic book fans, but the film never builds on them in such a way that its formula sensibilities ever amount to much. It’s telling that one of the children sitting near me got bored halfway through the movie and just started playing in the front row until her father sat her down (she kept getting up, though). The whole film feels like a good idea that needed some goosing it just didn’t get. There’s lot of stuff that is theoretically interesting, but it doesn’t feel connected (Megamind and Titan’s relationship should have more weight than it does).
DreamWorks hires a lot of talented performers but often that heightens the disconnect from the voice to the CGI. Ferrell is funny but distracting. He’s got some comic mannerisms that feel forced (mispronunciation), and though his voice is expressive he’s not a great voice actor – I’d rather watch him deliver his dialog than this CGI character in the film. David Cross probably comes across the best, because he’s got such a distinctive and interesting voice, and he plays well as the drama-queen fish/support staff. Whereas I didn’t know it was Tina Fey until the end credits – it could have been a Friends cast member, and I wouldn’t have known the difference. Of course she’s never just the victim, but her character functions mostly as a plot device. There’s no “you go” female empowerment, but there’s also no real character. Then again, Dreamworks animation has a tradition of having name talent that don’t enhance or benefit the narrative.
But this fits with the MO of DreamWorks animation in general. When Patton Oswalt said he was acting as a consultant, or Guillermo Del Toro’s gets on board as an executive producer, you figured these guys would up their game. But this is DreamWorks near their worst: high concept, low wattage. And if it feels like I’m beating up on a movie that’s mostly just mediocre, it’s because it has all the elements to be great.





22 comments
I honestly think Will Farrell is a fairly decent voice actor (check out Oblongs or that one Family Guy episode if you haven't), but I think it's just a case of the director just being like: "Okay, be Will Farrell/wacky!" instead of giving him any actual character direction. But oh well, can't say I'm really surprised with your review, though.
THIS POST HAS BEEN REMOVED
Yeah, sounds like my reaction to the trailer. "I should like this."
Toy Story 3 is now the most successful animated film ever made.
Ah, the global vs. domestic dispute.
"Whereas I didn’t know it was Tina Fey until the end credits…" Seriously? It's on the bloody poster and pretty damn clear in the trailer as to which character she plays.
As for your take on the film, it is actually a higher score than I would have thought. This looked like a turkey from day one.
Yea its a cartoon for kids so who the fuck cares. Parents will take their kids and be bored just like any of the crap pixar shits out.
really chudfan? Pixar doesn't produce crap. Your parents did when they made you.
marco, do NOT feed the Chudfan. Like all trolls, he'll only stick around if you keep feeding him. Learned that from Marlin Perkins.
"But it was Shrek and the move to computer generated animation…"
Actually, Andre, DreamWorks' first animated feature – Antz – was CGI.
Fuck commenter number 2. Your writing is a delight to digest.
Saw the preview for this movie ages ago and thought it looked like fun. Then I got it confused with 'Despicable Me'. Now I honestly don't know which is witch.
Credit where it's due: 'Antz' was the movie that set up Dreamworks as the Warner Bros. to Pixar's Disney.
Actually, I don't think that's what he was implying when he wrote that- just that Shrek was so very sucessful (much, much more so than Antz) that it really helped establish the sort of company that Dreamworks Animation would become.
I understand why the reviewer made the analogy between Dreamworks and Warner Bros. animation – but, hey, Dreamworks has no talent like they had at Termite Terrace. A better analogy would be Dreamworks = Walter Lantz productions.
I took my kids. They enjoyed it. Not bad for a kids movie. If you expect hints and nods to adults, it is not there. It is for kids.
Took my kids to see this the other day, and this review pretty much echoes my sentiments. There's a few really interesting ideas that have some above-child-level implications…but they never go anywhere. My kids liked it though, and it triggered a conversation about why Batman never kills the villains, so that was nice.
I saw this over the weekend at an afternoon showing. The kids in the theatre loved it. It's story-line is more complicated than a normal kid movie so its not mind-numbing. There are inside jokes for comic book fans and adults. Not as esoteric as the "one of us" freaks reference in AstroBoy. It's not as good as the Shrek or Toy Story franchises but it's better than Planet 51, Astroboy, and close to Despicable Me. I'd say a solid B.
Are you suggesting that Prince had more heart than Michael Jackson? More cock for sure, but more heart? And also you seem to suggest that Michael Jackson merely 'tweaked' popular culture? At his peak Michael Jackson WAS pop culture. Prince was a successful singer and performer in the 80s and 90s – but Michael Jackson was a phenomenon. If anything I'd say Pixar = MJ whereas Dreamworks = Prince. Most of Pixar's output will survive and hold-up for generations, Dreamworks stuff, not so much.
Can't understand dudes dumping on writing styles now … you would prefer Devin? Good story, and the movie was average … just saw it last night. This is a DVD, not a Blu Ray purchase for the kid when it comes out.
Saw it on Saturday with my 5yr old and we loved it. Normally I'm in line with you, but I loved the film.
@#16
Yeah, I bet those tiny kids of yours were all over those Pat Morita and Marlon Brando references. Fucking brilliant little whippersnappers.
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.