HOLY SHIT! "It's more beautiful than I ever imagined."
Yeah, I'm REALLY Tired of Sarcasm11.09.2010
The CG Dude looks crackin'.
Duffy11.09.2010
Olivia Wilde looks like the sexiest fucking sci-fi babe ever. I mean that. As balls out cool as everything looks here, she's what I'm most looking forward to.
Mantronic11.09.2010
Can still see the plastic in that Young-Jeff but what the hey, a small complaint if they got the rest of the movie working.
marco11.09.2010
Due to the studio's insistence that we all get tired of Tron before the movie even comes out, I have now found myself to be fatigued to the point where I am purposely avoiding every marketing tool being used to promote the movie. Having said that, hey thanks for sharing.
Anonymous11.09.2010
Dave11.09.2010
The more I see, the more I'm convinced this is going to rock. And it feels good.
BKB11.10.2010
For as much hype as Disney is throwing on this, what happens if this sinks and doesn't perform up to the hype created by Disney??? Then what?? If memory does serve correctly, TRON wasn't exactly very well received back in 1982, so why should this be any different??? I'm not getting the overly love for this sequel…
Michael11.10.2010
The CG bridges looks fucking terrible. How can a studio put out a trailer with the CG looking that SyFy channel shoddy?
Jmacq111.10.2010
#7 – Tron is one of those films that's gained more of a following on home video than it garnered in theaters. It's not quite on the same level as "Blade Runner" in that regard, but it's a similar phenomenon…what was once a middling box-office picture became much bigger thing in the intervening years. It's not quite a "classic" but most people know what it is, and name-recognition alone will probably put some butts in seats…nevermind that this looks about a hundred thousand times better than the original.
As for plasticky CGI Jeff Bridges…doesn't bother me that much. Didn't look that bad to me in the previous trailer on my HDTV. Clearly not real, but close enough for my tastes. Certainly not a deal-breaker.
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.
10 comments
HOLY SHIT! "It's more beautiful than I ever imagined."
The CG Dude looks crackin'.
Olivia Wilde looks like the sexiest fucking sci-fi babe ever. I mean that. As balls out cool as everything looks here, she's what I'm most looking forward to.
Can still see the plastic in that Young-Jeff but what the hey, a small complaint if they got the rest of the movie working.
Due to the studio's insistence that we all get tired of Tron before the movie even comes out, I have now found myself to be fatigued to the point where I am purposely avoiding every marketing tool being used to promote the movie. Having said that, hey thanks for sharing.
The more I see, the more I'm convinced this is going to rock. And it feels good.
For as much hype as Disney is throwing on this, what happens if this sinks and doesn't perform up to the hype created by Disney??? Then what?? If memory does serve correctly, TRON wasn't exactly very well received back in 1982, so why should this be any different??? I'm not getting the overly love for this sequel…
The CG bridges looks fucking terrible. How can a studio put out a trailer with the CG looking that SyFy channel shoddy?
#7 – Tron is one of those films that's gained more of a following on home video than it garnered in theaters. It's not quite on the same level as "Blade Runner" in that regard, but it's a similar phenomenon…what was once a middling box-office picture became much bigger thing in the intervening years. It's not quite a "classic" but most people know what it is, and name-recognition alone will probably put some butts in seats…nevermind that this looks about a hundred thousand times better than the original.
As for plasticky CGI Jeff Bridges…doesn't bother me that much. Didn't look that bad to me in the previous trailer on my HDTV. Clearly not real, but close enough for my tastes. Certainly not a deal-breaker.
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.