single person who visits this site fancies themselves a film
fan. From the nameless readers who don’t interact to
the regular Chewers on the Boards to every single person on the staff –
we love film. We live for it. We watch as much of
it as we can. But, sadly, we’ll never be able to see
everything. We’ve missed a lot over the years and
sometimes we’ll miss one of the big ones. One of the
classics or cult favorites that has had everyone talking and
proclaiming their love for years. That’s what this
column is all about – the big ones that we‘ve
missed. Every week a different member of the CHUD Crew is
gonna play their own little game of catch-up and tell you about it
here. Maybe it’ll get you to rewatch an old favorite
you haven’t seen in years, maybe it’ll get you to
catch up on your own list of shamefully neglected films.
Either way, we hope you enjoy it.

Tron (1982) – Buy it from CHUD
I bet I’m not the only one either brushing up on this movie or seeing it for the first time this weekend. Tron is one of those movies that I just never got around to catching for one reason or another. Don’t exactly know how I missed out on it in ’82, because, being a 10-year-old video game junkie, it would have been one of the movies I definitely would have wanted to see. Seeing it now, I wish I had seen it back then, because I’m sure it would have been one of the fonder movie-going memories I would have had. And I find it humorous that the Motion Picture Academy refused to grant it a Best Visual Effects Oscar nomination because the filmmakers “cheated” by using computers. Silly rabbits….

Unfortunately, one of the beta testers for the new site wasn’t quite up to snuff…
and through the years for its look. As dated as it is now, I nevertheless remember special effects from back in the day. And, as essentially the first computer-generated
movie, it looks like hardly anything I’ve seen from back then. That being said, however, seeing it now for the first time, Tron just didn’t grab me. I went in with no preconceptions or expectations, and still I only slightly enjoyed it.

“Heh, Jeff, you think this is how people will dress in the new millennium?”
“Come on. Who’d be that big of a loser…?”
Also, David Warner was his usual nicely evil self. The rest of the
performances though, even Bruce Boxleitner’s rather wooden portrayal of Tron, were generally serviceable at best. I hate saying that because I like Boxleitner, going back to Scarecrow and Mrs. King (yeah, I watched it, sue me).

Actual footage from a staff meeting with Nick…
wasn’t a movie that relied so heavily upon the performances. This is a
visual spectacular by intent. And, especially for the time, it
delivered in that regard. The movie succeeded in pulling you into a
video game and making you actually feel part of it. Hell, being a fan
of Automan
when it was on, I realize now how much that show scammed from this
movie. I mean, holy shit, how did the producers of that show not get
ruined by an intellectual property lawsuit? Even down to the neon chopper. Amazing.

There’s a Johnny Five sees Ally Sheedy in the bathtub joke that’s appropriate here…
The production design by Moebius, Syd Mead (who had a double home run with Blade Runner
the same year) and Peter Lloyd was also distinctive and memorable.
Doubtless there wasn’t a kid who saw the film back then who didn’t want a
lightcycle. Tron also had larger implications about Big Brother, freedoms that are snatched away in a society and deity worship that are still relevant today. Overall, I think the legacy of Tron is easily bigger than the movie itself. Just look what it started and where we are today.
It’s a film for which I regret being late to the party. Because I think the younger me missed out on something that the current me can’t fully appreciate.





5 comments
Thing is, I remember seeing Tron in the cinema as a kid and being bored to tears. Only in later years did I come to appreciate the unique Futurist aesthetic (Flynn's descent to the grid after being zapped into cubes with the big laser thingy is a wonderful piece of animation), Wendy Carlos' incredible score, exactly what went into creating the CG sequences (FWIW, I reckon I could knock up the entire lightcycle sequence on my laptop in a weekend, including rendering): the whole thing's like some really cool abstract art movie that someone then intercut with some plodding generic sf tropes. It's a film I can admire, but not adore.
I have a hard time with it being called a 'computer generated movie.' The CG was a brand new thing at the time and when it's used, it's kind of beautiful in a stark and shiny way. But what makes Tron so amazing to me is the animation technique used to create the look of everything else in the computer world. The legion of animators who had to rotoscope all of the neon lines in the costumes, sets, and props frame by frame is staggering. Even if you took the few CG sequences out, the film would look amazing and was a tremendous piece of technical work.
The story was an afterthought, for sure. But for a film released at a time before most people had much experience with a personal computer, it still dealt with some great ideas in inventive ways. The Bit was one of my favorites, the data I/O ports, the notion of a master control program… all way way ahead of the audience in 1982.
I saw TRON in the theaters with very little knowledge of what in the hell computing was, and it enthralled the hell out of me. It's a fantastical world inside of computers and that led to me wondering if that worked with TVs as well at the time. The fact that people were bored by TRON and LEGACY sort of makes me wonder… how?
Why the fuck is this out of print on DVD? It's almost like Disney doesn't want a whole new generation of folks to see this now because they've got a shiny new version 2.0 in theaters. Which, BTW, has none of the charm of the original, and is sadly lacking Cindy Morgan's nerd-in-big-glasses sex appeal. Hopefully a fully loaded Blu-Ray will come next year.
I guess I'm one of the older CHUD readers. I was in high school when I saw TRON in the theater. My dad was a programmer and I was always around computers, so I gravitated to TRON. And being a constant visitor to the arcade (when an arcade was just like Flynn's) pulled me into the movie even more. I thought the film was very imaginative and the graphics (for their time) were breaking new ground. Like the reviewer said, the story wasn't its strong point. But there was enough there to keep me interested. And it certainly was enough to lay a foundation for the new movie. The orignal TRON wasn't a blockbuster, but it sure was a good movie to me probably because it hit me at the right time in my life. It doesn't hold up that well now, but special effects movies rarely do. This movie is worth a couple hours if you plan to see the new one. And I, for one, absolutely loved TRON Legacy.
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.