According to Variety, the latest film subject to the machinations of Hollywood is the 1984 film Firestarter, which is itself based off of the novel by Stephen King. The original film told the tale of a young girl played by little Drew Barrymore who could, you guessed it…start fires with her thoughts. Universal and Dino De Laurentiis’s company seek to turn the one-off novel-turned-film into a franchise. Hopefully, this means fires will be started, then put back out, then started again, and so on and so forth until they reboot it again.
“We see this as a unique, character-driven thriller with a supernatural edge, based on a timeless concept and enhanced by recent visual effects advances,” Martha De Laurentiis said about the remake. Additionally, the article claims that while the film will no doubt retain some fidelity to its source material, the producers are seeking to reinvent the character “with a little edge.”
Variety also continues to say that scribe Mark L. Smith, the writer behind 2007’s Luke Wilson starring vehicle Vacancy, is already hard at work on the script, with a production slated to begin next year. No director is attached yet.
Personally, I hadn’t really registered knowledge of the property outside of the Sci-Fi original movie Firestarter 2: Rekindled (which is brought up in the article), nor would the prospect of an edgy re-imagining on a film that stars a pre-pubescent little girl. Surely this is the product of the Twilight franchise, so we can look forward to a girl that can start sparkly fires with her lusty passions. Her lusty, oh so seductive passions.
On second thought, I’m looking forward to this movie.
Source: Variety.com





14 comments
You hadn't "registered of the property"? Really, has this site come down to that level of non-English?
Basically, are you saying that you haven't seen Firestarter, or maybe have read the novel? Both the novel and film are classics (Drew Barrymore's child performances are amongst the best, not just of hers or child-actors, but of anyone).
Are you actually a real author or did your posts just make it on here? If you are the way CHUD is going, then I will have to delete this site.
@#1 – you will have to "delete this site?" Basically, are you saying you will destroy CHUD and remove it from the internet, or do you mean you will no longer visit the site? Douchenozzle.
First off, that #2 guy is definitely not me, I am the real Kenny Madison. Second, for #1, I just hadn't heard of the property. I don't really read Stephen King novels, nor watch films based off of his novels, so I am sorry for deeply offending you.
Go away John. Nobody cares.
Well, Kenny, you can delete it from you "favorites" tab, but I can't speak for John's true intentions or what he meant by "delete"….maybe he has power that are heretofore unheard of in the annals(heh) of talkbackerdom. The original movie is pretty well known though, so it isn't such a stretch to scoff at the fact that you are writing for a movie site and haven't even heard of it….
I think John was mainly taking issue with the grammar/sentence structure. I'm not how one "registers of" something either. And I think it's silly to defend that type of poor writing/editing anywhere, the nature of the property being discussed not withstanding.
P.S. I've never posted here before what the fuck is wrong with the comment submission form??
this franchise will blow but the reviewer will watch it anyway because it will have nubiles. Thats' what I can register of that.
Also: I am predicting six attempts.
@ grammardong: Wow. What does "I'm not how one "registers of" something either" mean? If something doesn't register with us, we don't become you, grammardong. That's the only possible grammatically correct meaning. We would only become a regular dong.
Way to roll out the red carpet for Kenny, guys.
I watched the original about 2 months ago after finishing the audio book. Man oh man is it Bad, it is definitely in the so bad it's funny realm. It includes such horrible 80s sci-fi moments as wavy screen flashbacks and whirring noises when someone does something sci-fi-ish.
As long as it is better than the made-for-tv sequel.
@#10. Enjoy the "edgy" Twilight Remake then, fuckface.
There's nothing wrong with his grammar you fuck wads.
So has the original
Kenny seen the original firestarter?
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.