Oh, and I know frigid. This comes from someone who was stuck on an N train platform for a couple of hours Sunday night and frozen to the point where I started looking around to see whose skin would be warmest to wear. (Turns out it was mine. Predicament!)
Spider-Man: Turn Off the Dark continues to be an easy target for laughs, but the popularity of Spidey-bashing has prompted two publications to publish controversial early reviews. Newsday and Bloomberg News are the culprits and their reviews were just a little bit less than positive. Jeremy Gerard from Bloomberg writes that it appears that “the second act has yet to be completed” and that it’s “an unfocused hodge-podge of story-telling, myth-making and spectacle that comes up short in every department.” Linda Winer from Newsday calls it “meandering” though thinks that the stunts, if performed safely, could bring in audiences. It’s interesting to note that she pretty much confirms that what she’s doing isn’t ethical, since the show’s still in previews.
But Spidey ain’t taking this lying down! (He’s got a concussion, the doctor wouldn’t allow him.)

“For a major critic to review a Broadway musical, or play for that matter, after only the twentieth preview, is disappointing and uncalled for,” press agent Rick Miramontez said in a statement. “Whatever reason the critic or their editor may have, it does not mask the fact that for decades, musicals have developed in front of paying audiences before critics are INVITED. While we are certainly not naive about the media scrutiny attached to this production, as we have been accommodating throughout, this unprecedented new development is troubling, to say the least.”
It does seem enormously unprofessional for these critics to offer up their thoughts on an unfinished production, but the musical has become such a huge joke at this point that it was likely just too tempting a target. Each successive news report sounds worse and worse, mentioning the spectacle of actors flying over the audience as a high point but not much else. Plus, there’s the increasing number of reports of actors getting seriously injured during performances, most recently Natalie Mendoza (playing new villain Arachne) who quit after suffering a concussion received during the very first performance.
So, we’ll keep our jaws agape with just a hint of a shocked smile and wonder how much worse it can get, and see if the creators have better luck dragging it out of the muck than NYC Sanitation workers do.





7 comments
Holy shit, how many previews do they get before it counts? It's ridiculous that they take issue with the fact that people are criticizing it after ONLY 20 previews. That would be like a filmmaker releasing an uncompleted film into theaters and then slamming on critics and audiences because they're trashing something that's still a work in progress that was SUPPOSED to look like shit. Wow, that would certainly change moviegoing if you had to wait until the movie had been out for a couple of months to see the finished product. People keep getting hurt, and there's nothing about this production that sounds even remotely positive, so what if it's already as finished as it's going to get? At what point do they say "OK, this show is bullshit"?
Actually they do have early screenings of movies, up to a year before release, to get fed back on where the film is and what needs to get fixed. Often times effects wont be finished and the films will look rough.
Theatre is no different, plus you have the added variable of performing in front of a live audience. You have to see what jokes land, what parts are lagging and falling flat. You can't go from rehearsals to opening night in one day, so much changes when the audience comes in. So most plays will have about a month of previews to wok out the kinks.
Now clearly this show is so effed up that no amount of time is going to fix it. They need to Old Yeller it and move on with their lives.
This production is serving the sole purpose of giving a small number of middle-aged theater production vets a nice fat juicy pay check in a harsh economic climate. That's all. Wouldn't $65m be better spent on developing young theater talent at a grass roots level, than on this monstrosity? Fuck Taymor, fuck U2 and fuck everyone involved in this cluster fuck.
Comment #2—You certainly have a point about the advance screening thing, and I guess I should have clarified a bit, as I guess I was thinking more along the lines of movies that are actually released wide to paying audiences. You can't say something is coming out on Christmas Day for months, release the film, and then go "How dare you criticize our product! It's obviously not done and still has some bugs to work out! Come pay to see it again in February!" when it gets panned. This Spider-Man show has taken forever to put together, but it sounds like it's NEVER going to be ready. Are these previews the equivalent of a work print or something, of an uncut version of a film? How long is it going to take before they can pull it off without crippling someone, and will THAT be the first one that "counts"? Speaking of never working, 20th try with the verification…
I'm sorry, but if you're charging people to see a play, then it should be considered open season for reviews. Tradition be damned. Twenty "dress rehearsals" are more than enough to tell what works and what doesn't. If you can't fix a show by then, it's done. It will suck no matter how many previews you have. If you're charging audiences hundreds of dollars per ticket to see glorified dress rehearsals, then STFU if professional critics feel compelled to let potential audience members know if a show is worth their money. This show is the poster child for everything that is wrong with Broadway. The Broadway Musical as a vital art form is dead.
They are charging people in excess of 140 dollars a piece for seats. That's paramount to highway robbery.
@#6: What with Julie Taymor standing outside the theatre with a gun and all, saying "Stand and deliver!"
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.