I have had my eye on Ironclad for a long, long time. The initial casting reports pegged it as a pure medieval action movie — loose in fact, heavy on gore and sheer badassery.
You couldn’t pick a better historical story to base an action movie around. The Siege of Rochester Castle in 1215 wasn’t a major point in history — even if it did star one of fiction’s favorite medieval villains, King John — but it was long, gruesome, full of heroics and appalling barbarity. The fate of the Rochester rebels wasn’t a happy one.
Whether Ironclad keeps the grim ending remains to be seen, but it does offer a lot of screaming, swords, pithy lines, and gleeful scenery chewing by Paul Giamatti. There’s a vaguely 1980s flavor to this — maybe it’s Kate Mara’s headband, maybe it’s the stark Conanish style, but I like it. It’s not really pretending to be anything grand. It is what it promised to be — an action movie set in the 13th century.
Check out the trailer below. I’m sold, but then I’ll watch anything that combines James Purefoy, tabards, and a rocking guitar riff. How can that mix let me down?
[via Cinema Blend]





5 comments
did someone say trailer? where? no see linky…
You can’t dangle Giamatti scenery chewing in front of me and not deliver! Where’s the trailer?
TRAILER OR IT DIDN’T HAPPEN
Sorry about that! It should be up now. My Internet cut out as I hit publish, and clearly it didn’t save/publish the draft that actually had the embed. I couldn’t get online to see it, let alone fix it! 🙁
I am really excited about this, but I’m worried this will suffer the same distribution fate that be-felled Soloman Kane, in which case, I’ll never get to see it. Am I wrong to have such fears?
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.