I am not a particularly big fan of the original Arthur film. I thought it was funny when I was a kid, because Dudley Moore was drunk all the time. Then I tried watching it again on Netflix Instant with a date last year, and after about twenty minutes the lady asked if we could watch something else because she found Moore’s performance so abrasive. I did not put up any argument. Point being, I couldn’t care less that they remade the film with Russell Brand. I certainly don’t think Brand is this generation’s Dudley Moore. But whatever.
The trailer for Brand’s Arthur – featuring Helen Mirren in the role that comically won John Gielgud his only Oscar – has gone live:
I’ve certainly seen worse trailers, but even ignoring the quality of the jokes themselves, there is something about the timing in this trailer that seem weirdly off. Also the musical choices are slumber inducing. For funzies, I’ve decided to throw in the trailer for the original Arthur for the purposes of comparison.
Now, I’m not saying this is an amazing trailer. But it has a certain rhythm to it. The jokes come at you with purpose – boom, boom – marked off almost into little chapters by those bizarre title card bumpers featuring Moore’s signature obnoxious (or delightful, depending on your tastes) laugh. Beyond that, Moore really had a unique character for Arthur (love it or hate it). I guess maybe such a thing won’t fly for a family film in 2011, but it seems odd that Arthur isn’t a lovable drunk anymore. That was basically the entire character in the original film, and certainly the foundation for Moore’s iconic performance, which kind of hearkened back to the vaudevillian traditions of the stumbling but sympathetic wino. Brand’s character just seems, well, like Brand – a low energy man-child. The enthusiasm that Moore brought to the part seems absent here. They’ve replaced Arthur’s rascally and self-aware wit with naive-idiot jokes. That just inherently less funny to me.
I was also going to say that it is a little embarrassing to watch Mirren here, but then I remembered National Treasure 2 and I felt better. Maybe she’ll get an Oscar for this too.





6 comments
So they’ve replaced drunk with retarded? Also, any movie based on the premise of someone not wanting to marry Jennifer Garner is too far-fetched to allow for suspension of disbelief.
So it has been years and years since I have seen Arthur, so I have very little to compare this to. Yes, it looks silly and far too good-natured, but I still chuckled a couple of times. Particularly “Outlook” and “at least something in this room is attracted to you.” I guess this just looks too sweet. They really could have mined quite a performance from the drunk angle, but passed. Shame.
That being said, I find the hate for Brand puzzling. It seems that one day a few years back I was just hearing about how much everyone loved this guy. As soon as I had the slightest bit of exposure to him, everyone hated him. So strange. So is he liked or isn’t he? Tell me people! I need to know what to think! I can’t make these decisions by myself. And while we’re at it, can we please get the story straight on Ryan Reynolds? Hip or un-hip to like him?
So the trailer comparison shows us that a mediocre old movie has been retooled into a mediocre-looking new movie. Huzzah?
And I have to agree with TCD on the Jennifer Garner angle. Maybe in the context of the whole movie it makes more sense? (he can’t marry her because he’s in love with Luis Guzman!)
Brand looks like a disgusting fucking creep and makes me want to take a shower any time I see the fucking scumbag.
Assuming one finds Jennifer Garner attractive? I, for one, am completely revolted by her. I get the point since Brand isn’t attractive and most people probably find her good-looking, but I don’t…even a little.
So they remade Billy Madison?
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.