
This is going to be a bit of a limp entry, because that’s what happens when you see Your Highness instead of Hanna, and so you can’t really jump on board the brewing “Now that’s how you do an action heroine movie!” debate.
Incidentally, I don’t want to lure you from CHUD, but if you want to hear me review Your Highness, I did so on Fat Guy at the Movies. If you listen, you’re going to learn things about me you never wanted to know. But there’s where a lot of my critical — ha! — thought went this week.
But not all! I still have some left. And I’ve turned it inward, wondering why the hell I, out of so many others, couldn’t get very riled up about Sucker Punch. In fact, I’m finding it hard pressed to get angry about entertainment in general. The last instances I can think of were Avatar and the LOST finale, and even then, it wasn’t anger at the properties themselves, but the fans of them who were furious I didn’t share their opinion. As we all know, if you fail to convert a skeptic with a link to a piece that explains why the LOST finale is good, and they are wrong, then you must tear through Twitter screaming what a bitch they are. The life of the property, and your feelings and faith in it, depend on it!
No, this isn’t a tirade against trolls. I’m sorry, I digressed a bit. What I meant to talk about was the sheer wave of anger that followed Sucker Punch, though that film was certainly not the first (and won’t be the last) to incur such wrath. It raped my eyeballs, it’s the worst movie of the year, it’s the worst movie of the decade, fuck no it killed cinema altogether, inaudible sound of rage.
I saw it, and my response was absolutely cool. A “meh.” I was disappointed I couldn’t get riled up one way or another, because I knew I wanted to write about it, and writing is easier when fueled by anger or love. (Of course, it can also be very difficult if your feelings are so strong and blinding that you can’t see the laptop keys. Been there.)
I’ve felt that way about a lot of properties and news recently. I feel almost envious of those who can live on a bipolar plane of emotion, living the highs and lows of the RSS feed to the fullest. I used to, but like anyone married to something for a few years, I’ve settled into a warm glow of interest and enjoyment. And I feel as though something’s a bit wrong with me. I know someone would tell me that it doesn’t matter. Film and television don’t affect the grand scheme of things.
But they’re art. Art does matter. Art can bring down governments. Art — or even the failure of something to be art — is worth getting fired up about. If Sucker Punch degraded women, or didn’t degrade women, or failed to talk intelligently about that degradation, then goddamn that’s a conversation worth having. And I had it, and I enjoyed the intellectual exercise of analyzing it, but I just didn’t feel very much energy about it. But so many others did.
Now, lest anyone accuse me of turning out some woe is me piece, let me stress that I’m not feeling bad about this. Rather, I think I’ve gone to this place of detachment as a reaction against what I view as an increasingly dramatic and hysteric bid for traffic. I know that I will “go off” about a film, but I want that time to be special. I want it to matter. I want the emotion to be real and not watered down because I’ve gone off about every other film on a given week.
I feel like the online discussion is making intensity insignificant. From a reader’s perspective (and I’m as much of a reader as anyone currently scanning this), it’s impossible to know what is actually a bad film or television show because it’s all the absolute worst. And the person who can shout it the fastest, the loudest, and with the most cutting and pithy turn of phrase, wins the attention. For an hour or two, at least. Because someone louder always comes along once another screening lets out. At the risk of sounding really Walt Kowalski-ish, it feels like a byproduct of social media and of everyone — be they your favorite film critic or your cousin — being on some exaggerated form of display. We live our lives in public, and our opinions are nothing if not heard — and we feel they can’t be heard unless they are done so in a dramatic, heart clutching fashion.
Maybe I’m missing out on the fun of the collective anger experience. Maybe I’m missing the point in treating every single film like the end all, be all of cinematic experience. I have a difficult enough time maintaining the balance and chirpiness of my “public” life anyway without revving myself up into a frothing mess of emotion over The Adjustment Bureau, Your Highness, Sucker Punch, or whatever might be the target on a given week. I’d like to think it’s just being judicious and prudent, but perhaps it means I’m too dispassionate and out-of-touch for the current audience.
Ugh. This comes off a lot more maudlin and naval-gazing than I intended. But from some of the feedback I received on the Sucker Punch piece, and in subsequent discussions I had with friends and colleagues, there were some glimmers of weariness and bafflement that it hit so hard. Again, this film was one example — there are dozens of others, The Hangover was one that came up in the CHUD forums recently — and I feel like there’s a growing realization that some of these films just aren’t worth the energy the crowd is investing in bitching about them.
Or are they? I put it to you, because I’m genuinely curious. Am I disdaining an energy that is actually indicative of important social debate? Or is it just silly noise, expended on topics that don’t merit quite so much fury?





12 comments
Silly noise.
Titles that mean nothing to you or me mean something to somebody else, so they start to spout off. Somebody’s always going to have a strong reaction even when you don’t. And with easy to post responses, like this, everybody gets their say until it all bundles together.
An article about “Sucker Punch” in April 2011? It’s like taking a time machine back to the more innocent times of mid-to-late March 2011, before the movie came out and was promptly forgotten/ignored by the general public. Ahhhh, the good old days.
Given that Sucker Punch only just opened two days ago in Australia, part of me is really hoping it does well (it’s got two Aussie’s in it, so fingers crossed) and I’m still living in a world where I might actually enjoy the shit out of this film. I’m hoping I’m right, but deep down inside I know I’m going to be wrong.
For me it depends on the property. I thought Avatar was crap, and I was happy to express my views on message boards. If a film maker of James Cameron’s quality spends 10 years and $300m making a bad movie and the online community response is just “meh, whatever” then there’s something wrong. Next year, three films will work people up into an absolute frothing frenzy – The Dark Knight Rises, Prometheus and The Hobbit – and that’s how it should be. But properties like Sucker Punch and The Adjustment Bureau…frankly who cares?
IMHO, it’s like Charlie Sheen says: you’ve gotta love with violence and hate with violence. It’s important to take a stand and be passionate about what you believe. Even if some of these movies might not seem that objectively offensive to Joe and Jane cineplex, if you’re a fan of film, the stakes are different. A film like Suckerpunch can’t simply be ignored — it’s success or failure will impace what other films are released in the future. So you go can’t live in the middle. In the words of DDL from GANGS OF NEW YORK, when it comes to a film like, say, KNIGHT AND DAY, because it is lukewarm, neither hot nor cold, I will spit it out
The Internets never met hyperbole it didn’t like (or could likely pronouce correctly.)
Simple as that.
Most people aren’t nearly as emotionally involved as they express themselves in print because accurate expression takes writing skill and thought that not too many possess (or will take the time to craft.)
Ms. Rappe, if you’re gonna consider film on merrit and not ‘us/them’ dynamics, I’m not sure you’ll make it here. Kidding. I appreciate your thoughtful article, (all of them, really) and question of passion. I love reading vehement, violent arguments where men and women, who don’t know each other rage, attack and defend the success and failure of productions composed and marketed by MILLIONAIRES.
Dave Thomas of SCTV said, “The worst movie ever made is playing on late-night TV somewhere and making somebody money.”
This from half the team that brought us Strange Brew.
Don’t get me wrong, it’s not that I haven’t felt pasionately that James Cameron doesn’t know how to put a cork in his 3rd act or Zack Snyder is, sigh, Zack Snyder. I just haven’t felt strongly enough to register/comment on it.
But I appreciate your tone, (that you don’t imitate current/former writers) here. That you don’t result to shock or schlock is refreshing. I prefer content in commentary and film, not controversy for controversy sake.
Thank you, again, for a thoughful article.
A “warm glow of interest and enjoyment” sounds appropriate for most of the movies you’re talking about. I can’t get riled up either. To each their own though. Good article.
Great article Elisabeth, you pretty much said exactly what I’ve been thinking the last couple of years. Passion is a wonderful thing, and sometimes it is fun to get a little riled up and slag something into the ground for the sake of entertaining conversation, but a lot of people just cross into melodrama on a lot of these things. For me, I just feel there’s far too many good things to enjoy about film to be getting all fundamentalist about things, but that’s the tone you get in a lot of Internet discussions.
Sucker Punch is a great example – me, I haven’t seen SP and have no intentions to. In fact, I’m completely apathetic about Zack Snyder in general, but I’m not going to go farting around declaring him as the walking death knell of cinema. why? Because he’s not. There’s a place for Snyder in the film world, and until he actually starts going around burning vintage Kurosawa reels I don’t see the point of putting that kind of importance on him. It certainly don’t feel it makes me less of a film fan for not doing that either.
And that’s the key for me. I think people rant on the way they do because it makes them feel more refined and ‘legitimate’ in their fandom. This is especially true on closed communities like message boards where you see group opinions form on certain things that others aren’t allowed to question lest their taste, intelligence and VERY LOVE OF FILM ITSELF be dragged into the ground.
Personally, I just find it all a bit self-indulgent and melodramatic. Again, passion is one thing but if you’re carrying on like an aneurysm’s about to drop every time you see a news story you don’t like, well… That’s about you at that point.
It is rare for me to get excited about a film now. When I was a kid, living in the theatre (literally), it was different- and we played a different film every week. I got as excited about Carbon Copy as I did for Tron.
I don’t think you truly know what you like and what excites you as a film fan until you are forced to make a choice in terms of what to watch and what can wait.
Not long ago, I spent at least 90% of my free time watching movies. If I was at home, I’d be watching a flick. On vacation? Catch one late at night on the hotel TV or go to a theater if it was a dreary day. A friend or family member wants to go to the movies? I’d tag along to see almost anything. I’d blind buy stuff all the time because I didn’t have much else I needed to spend my money on outside of essentials (rent, bills, etc). I’d go see movies by myself all the time.
Now that I’m married and have a little one, I am forced to be a helluva lot pickier about what I spend my free time on. Is this movie worth spending my only free hours today going to see? Is this film worth blind buying or Netflixing at this time? My son is sleeping right now, so what film is most worth my time right now? It is interesting to find out what you watch and what ends up sitting there for days (or weeks) at a time unwatched.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,or out of all the trailers that interest you, what films you actually take the time to see in the theater.
Do films like Your Highness, Water For Elephants, Arthur, Dylan Dog, etc. look like ones I would like to see at some point? Sure, but if I can make it out of the house I am far more likely to see something that I personally feel I absolutely can’t wait for home video to see. I know I will likely be missing out on some entertaining films (be they listed above or not), but I will see them eventually. It has less to do with money and more to do with time. I would rather spend my time seeing Source Code or The Lincoln Lawyer or Hanna,,,,,,,,,,,,than Paul. I love Simon Pegg and Nick Frost to death, but that’s the choice I have made in the end. Of course my wife’s opinion also factors in part of the time, but if I REALLY want to see something I will make it a point to go out of my way to do so. Sometime I make the wrong choice, but I have noticed so far that I haven’t been disappointed with any of the choices I have made so far this year. That said, I do wish I hadn’t been drug by my wife to see Gnomeo & Juliet. That is the only theatrical experience I have had this year where I was mad about the money I spent. Such is life though.
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.