
You may remember I lead a bitter, loveless life. You may even remember that I wrote a post praising Clint Eastwood from saving me from jerks and losers. That was a target I willingly painted on myself (October 2010 Elisabeth, where did you find the energy? The wit?), and was amused and horrified at the response.
What touched me at the time were the readers who commented (not just on the whole “real man” thing) but those who recognized the way cinema infuses our expectations of life and relationships. This was also something that embarrassed me, because I didn’t mean to suggest my basis of reality is a movie screen. Yet when you’re as into films as we are, I imagine that it is a sort of cross-pollination. We see ourselves on the screen, and the stories can bounce back and alter our own lives. Consciously or unconsciously, we’ve made a database of references that we stack up against our life, and vice versa. “That would never happen” / “That’s totally happened!” / “I wish that would happen!”
That’s a very long preamble to saying yes, movies have affected the way I view dating. I’m not influenced by romantic comedies and their meet-cutes, but the sort of ballsiness you find in your average film. Let’s look at my touchstone, Mr. Eastwood. There’s a throwaway scene in Every Which Way But Loose where he and Philo and Orville are in a bar, and they playfully argue about two girls who caught their eye. Philo wants the blonde, Orville the redhead. In due course, Philo swaggers up to buy the blonde a beer. He’s very cool about it, actually, but she shoots him down. She’s only there because she’s doing a sociology project on country music. So he slips his mom’s dentures into her soup in revenge. It’s a dick move, but considering his life choices, not surprising.

But everything before that – the casual way he walks up and says hi, want a beer? – is the scenario I expected of average male and female interactions. It’s echoed (sans dentures, usually with more success) in lots and lots of movies, leading me to believe it’s normal. Hell, I find it within my own family! Once, I asked my grandma how she met my grandpa, and she gave me a very similar story, only set in the glamorous 1930s. My grandparents were not Katharine Hepburn and Spencer Tracy, but they might as well have been from the witty repartee and airiness she described.
But that’s not the case anymore, if it ever was. Now every time I brush up against the opposite sex, it’s less Spencer-Tracy and more prelude to a horror film.
I dropped a bunch of business cards at Whole Foods. They seem to have burst forth from my wallet so that when I reached in to grab my iphone, they spilled out. I thought I’d picked them all up, but I had this feeling – this odd premonition – that I hadn’t. But so what? Logic would dictate a stray would get swept up with the litter. Right?
Wrong. Now, I probably should note that my business cards are geeky in nature. Dissuaded from using Wolverine, I instead illustrated it with this:

Yes, it’s Lara Croft. But I deliberately chose an image that didn’t show her tits or her trademark outfit because I didn’t want to send a sexy message. I wanted something just vague enough that it could be any character from a comic, movie, or video game. I was also amused it echoed a character shot in both Lethal Weapon and Magnum Force, but with a chick. It’s vibrant and unusual, and I thought nothing of it. I still don’t, though I’m contemplating dumping it.
A perverse stroke of destiny put my lost card in someone’s hands. Who’s? I’ll never know, but he sent me this:
The sender name is a mere three dots “…” The email handle (a quickie Hotmail setup, blurred out for privacy he doesn’t deserve) is, best that I can figure, a type of foreign modem cable. Maximum anonymity.
Anonymous emails aren’t new to me. I work on the Internet, so I’ve gotten a lot of them. I expect them to be spawned from the Internet and my work on it. It is absolutely shocking to have it result from Whole Foods, land of dreadlocks and patchouli. How did this card not end up in the trash? How is it possible that the one person to find it is the template of an Internet lurker, complete with anime smiles?
I fired back, though I stopped short of telling him to fuck off and die. Why respond? Curiosity — and the persistent belief that someone needs to inform these bundles of XY chromosomes that this behavior is unacceptable — compelled me.

He responded:
It took me awhile to realize there was an attachment. I guess because the sight of anime smileys fill me with berserker rage. I scanned down tentatively imagining penises, bloody corpses, mutilated animals….

It’s a relief, but I don’t even know what it means. And what does he hope to accomplish? Obviously, he dreams of my love, but in an unhealthy and bizarre way. How can I reciprocate with someone who has all of my contact info (I’m quite grateful he limited this to email) but doesn’t share his own? Not even his name?
As I mentioned to someone on Twitter, it’s sort of like these guys think girls want mysterious bad boys, so they decide to become the ultimate bad guy: Ted Bundy.
I freely confess that this left me angry. It added to an already severe bout of depression because my personal life constantly fall into the hands of the strange. As I took to Twitter and Facebook to complain, I received a bizarre mix of responses — sympathy, laughter, slut shaming over the choice in graphic, remarks about the best place to drop a business card for a “better catch”, wonderment that I’d dared to have my contact information on a business card, and gentle reminders that I am a woman, and just need to expect that men act this way. Number one, no, I don’t. (That’s its own issue right there.) Number two, since when is the new normal? Why do so many men out there think sending anonymous notes, obscene texts, and dick photos is cool, acceptable, and worthy of sexual reward and admiration? My grandma didn’t have to worry about stalkers and roofies. Why do I? If much of our sexual behavior or taste actually does derive from media influence, as many critics and scientists claim, where does this stuff factor in? It’s pretty baffling.
I also find myself looping into that mentality and wondering what exactly I was angry or depressed about. What did I expect? Wasn’t there a glimmer of “Wouldn’t it be neat if someone really cool found my card?” With shame and guilt, I realize this is exactly what the movies have taught me. In a flash, I’d surreptitiously cast myself in a modern reworking of Cinderella where Bradley Cooper found my business card, Googled my name, and discovered we shared a healthy love of spaghetti westerns, XBOX, pug dogs, beer, and travel.
And is that so crazy? Is such a brief flutter really from the movies, or is it the sort of meeting that actually happens and is adapted into one? Real life does echo goofy movie plots, or vice versa. People meet in a variety of ways. I have an aunt and uncle who met in the hospital, for heaven’s sake. That’s the sort of thing a screenwriter makes into a Meg Ryan movie. In fact, I’m pretty sure that is a Meg Ryan movie.
(Let me hasten to add I don’t actually, in a million years, think Cooper is at my Whole Foods or in my league. I’m not delusional. It’s a rom-com movie pitch. And a damn good one. Call me, Hollywood!)

And deep down, I have to admit that Dinosaur Boy up there probably had the exact same idea. He found geeky Cinderella’s shoe, so to speak, and he thought she would be so flattered by his anime smiles that she would invite him over to play video games, or watch Quentin Tarantino movies, or Pokemon. I bet he imagined me as Manic Pixie Dream Girl Natalie Portman.
Too bad life ain’t like the movies, though.





34 comments
\(*O*)/
Way to go you! Loved this for so many reasons. Funny stuff. @_@
Elisabeth, you realize that this is all some sort of viral marketing for Super 8, right? J.J. Abrams has been following you for weeks waiting for the opportunity to strike. Brother fits right in at Whole Foods.
Is it sexist and egregious that you automatically assume it’s a man that sent the email? Considering the anime smiles, the… interesting choice of attachment and of course, responding to a COMIC BOOK RENDERED business card, I would’ve presumed a 13-year-old boy.
You rage for respect but you respond, (feed attention to) the offensive email? You use a convoluted movie-metaphor to justify your rant and then gripe over the responses you’ve gotten. I work with women, mature and qualify, that fight everyday to be taken seriously in their chosen fields. And you use your platform– not to write about objectification and exploitation but– to complain, about an email. Really?
All the movies in the world never deluded me to think that (as a short, white, endomorph who works for a living) I’d ever dazzle Halle, Rosario, or Corinne with my wit and charm. I also accepted that if I want to be taken seriously in court, I shouldn’t wear my X-Men tie tack or carry my Alpha Flight lunch box. Your grandmother didn’t have to worry about stalkers and ruffies. My grandfather didn’t have to worry about professional attire or jolly fat man perceptions. He hustled around mine collapses and coal dust explosions. New dogs, new fleas. Progress hurts.
Your work is often inspired. This is beneath your standard.
I’m sorry to have disappointed you, SithPriest, but I think your rage is incredibly misguided and frankly, a little scary. If you do
It wasn’t a rant, incidentally, it was meant to be funny. If I failed in that, I’m sorry.
I also find it remarkable that you rage at me for not writing about objectification and exploitation, and yet you’ve just objectified me for not meeting a standard you yourself set. I’m reminded of the readership of Jezebel.com who complain that Tina Fey doesn’t lift women up with each interview and episode of 30 Rock.
There’s a time and a place for every conversation, and I’m not sure how planting my ass down here and saying “Listen up! Women are exploited!!” apropros of nothing — i.e. a Michael Bay movie — helps those women you work with, the ones I’m apparently supposed to be representing and lifting up with every column that I write on *a movie site.*
For all your concern about women, though, you condemn *me* for provoking the responses I did, and by your “Times change, whatever” attitude, give a free pass to every woman who has been harassed in her personal or professional life. I actually intended this (convoluted metaphor and all) to give a peek into what an average woman (yes, even those paragons you work with) faces every time she leaves the house. Man, boy, it doesn’t matter.
Again, the failure of expression is entirely mine, and I can take criticism just fine. You think it sucked, fine, but don’t dress it up in a Gloria Steinem routine. That’s beneath you too.
To answer the main question: Why do men think this is acceptable “courting” behaviour? I honestly have no clue. I’m married, been so for nearly twenty years now, and the singles world completely escapes me. This kind of creepy stalker mentality is, apparently, par for the course these days and it baffles me. Chalk it up to the anonymity of the internet, dwindling social skills and a complete lack of decorum. Or maybe it’s none of these things and I’m talking out of my ass. I do know, as a man myself, the reasons for it elude me. Take heart, though – I’m not the only one who feels this way. If it’s any consolation, these douchebags make up a very vocal minority at best. Means absolutely nothing for your situation, I know, but there it is.
The sad thing about the rise of the internet is it brought the rise of anonymous. And with that it’s brought a sense of entitlement, although that very well could have rose on its own. Nonetheless, it’s sad as a 19-year old male to have peers fall into the cracks of “Well, if I can’t get caught, I can do and say whatever the fuck I want.” I mean, it’s rather gross knowing that males my age, well mostly my age, can go on sites like Omegle with their genitals out expecting women to just want to see that. Hell, even as a straight guy it’d be weird to just see a random girl showing her breasts off on a place like that.
And as for film/TV influencing how we perceive how events SHOULD go, that makes total sense. If you constantly see an event occurring one way, and you don’t see the other half, it’s only destiny to find that as the norm. An example being I don’t expect to meet Anna Kendrick one day while Christmas shopping like John Cusack and Kate Beckinsale in Serendipity (Yes, I know it’s a dumb film. Don’t judge me.), but I do think SOMETHING like that is possible (One reason why I love big cities). And it’s almost entirely because I see that crap in movies all the time, and without something to tell me otherwise, all I really can do is believe it.
Seconded. Except for the “married for twenty years” part, that is.
On a side note, I find that dinosaur unsettling.
My stupid jokes aside (for a change) when I heard the way this email was described pre-article, I imagined something a lot more threatening sounding (which is why I recommended leaving it alone). Now that I see his/her message, it only seems socially retarded – not at all worrisome. The bad punctuation bothers me more than any of the content.
I thought the article was funny – I think your articles have been getting better and better in fact (also that you are often one of the refreshingly uncynical writers on CHUD right now) but it did feel a little mean-spirited and defensive toward someone… possibly a kid… possibly even a girl… who just isn’t a conscientious emailer. I see your points, but am not sure this person was the right subject, or maybe that more examples would be better.
I wouldn’t presume I could know what it’s like to be an attractive woman with geek-cred on the internet but I know that it invites a lot of the wrong kind of attention, so I won’t fault you for some healthy defensiveness. I should also mention (for the kids watching at home) that even though we don’t know each other, you’ve been very kind to me whenever I’ve sent you uninvited messages on CHUD or Twitter that were equally as pointless as this, so I know you don’t just have an all-purpose chip on your shoulder. Maybe you have a subconscious phobia of anime emoticons…
As I said prior to this, shit’s going to happen. It’s not fair, it’s not right…but, shit’s going to happen. I merely questioned your use of art on a business card. You made it seem like it got you upset, then you turnaround and say that this wasn’t that big of a deal. Kudos for getting an article out of it.
Wait … so you admit that you’d like for Bradley Cooper to find your card and contact you, but when this guy did it, it’s creepy? You got a totally awesome picture of a dinosaur out of it, so I don’t see what the big deal is …
Her problem isn’t being contacted so much as it’s being contacted anonymously. The best part is 15 years from now, she’ll meet Bradley Cooper on a interview or something and he’ll be wearing that Dino pic on a T-shirt because it’s his favorite piece of art. Turns out he does shop at her Whole Foods, did find her card, and did email her anonymously but only because he’s looking for a woman who won’t be immediately smitten by his celebrity rather than who he really is as a person.
Haha. Excellent.
The author is being very much less than honest with herself. As a result the piece is couched in obfuscation and modern babble-jargon: intimate confidences laced with “but-I-don’t-care”.
Of interest is the tension between the author’s unstated intentions, deep-seated sexual frustrations (issues having to do with heterosexual mores and not so much sex issues; though those will invariably crop up in a coupling situation), public image, private needs, artistic sleight-of-hand and need for fame.
If we picture anyone’s life as a sea (with all that implies) we should expect these nodes will manifest on the surface at any point of aggregation. The business card-dropping incident, which both Freud and Jung would agree was not an accident, as Ms Rappe herself is only too aware (re: the romcom thematic running throughout the piece) was the latest of those “points of accretion”. I believe the CHUD readership was aware of an earlier one involving shoes, or rather: boots.
I’m a bit too young to be her dad judging from Google returns (Lara Croft cosplay photos, a profile on G-Mash) but one thing I hear from colleagues, and some younger women I’ve dated is that these themes are the bugaboo just waiting to pounce from behind the flats in the dating theater of Elisabeth’s generation. There is no two ways about it: private is the new public in the age of social media.
Arguably my little ditty has little to nothing to do with the author’s blog: I don’t know what’s really going on in Ms Rappe’s life (and/or love life) but I know that I’m being “blinded by candor”.
Fascinating stuff, that.
I like the dinosaur.
Yeah, this was one of those ‘as soon as you hit the send button, you regret it,’ moments.
I’m thick and what with the screen caps and such, I missed the funny here by a country mile. My rant, (against your rant) is sorely missplaced as I sincerely hit this site for entertainment and missed that by a country mile as well. The Gloria-Steinem routine is part and parcel of my point, whatever it was.
So, too late for my long-story-short routine but I apologize.
Very well stated, Mr Rhodes. I would love to say everything you said is what I meant in my comment above, but of course my desktop won’t work very well this close to a lightening strike.
You use the word obfuscation, but judging from your writing style, you don’t actually know what it means. You sound like a psych major who is failing English, but can’t understand why. Actually, you sound like a failed psych major too, but I know those departments have lower standards than most, so you probably passed/are passing, confident there’s a therapist job waiting for you at the other end. (Stage whisper: No.)
See! I can analyze people too! It sure is fun. The medieval flavored handle and carefully British patois is cute. Tell me the D&D game is still on tonight!
And you ARE the smartest person in the room, with the smug belief that you’ve cracked the psyche of the modern woman and…wait, where have I heard that before? Oh yeah. http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/romantic_comedies_doom_love_EyxDzciI7n8vVccPGYHt0M?CMP=OTC-rss&FEEDNAME=
Tsk tsk, Vince. (Can I call you Vince?) Didn’t the Psychology emphasize citing your sources? You can’t just pass theories off as your own, even to look cool on the Internet.
It’s too bad that your exhaustive Googling didn’t turn up an article I wrote called “We Live Our Lives In Public” that expressed my frustration with the current mode of “If no one SEES me doing it, it’s not REAL,” an obsession that extends to the Internet and the need to have everyone see your blog, your Facebook photos, your Twitter, etc.
Oh, that’s right. I believe I wrote that on my personal blog which I had to take down because of people like you, Vince, who fanatically Google in the hopes of finding some tidbit of personal insight to use against the author. Whatever happened to just saying “I disagree”? Oh, that’s right, it’s the Internet, where the one who disagrees the most flamboyantly is rewarded. A huge appeal of new media over old is that you can be SEEN attacking the author (and perhaps even humiliating them, depending what Google turns up) in a way you couldn’t before, when your letter ended up on the crank pile or was handed to the police. Isn’t that true, Vince? Or are you too being “less than honest” with yourself?
The thing is, Vince, you’ve got me all wrong. I loathe working online. It’s the job I have, so I do it, but I hate that having a byline opens me up to individuals such as yourself. I have no interest in being an open book. If I didn’t need to post links and interact with readers, I wouldn’t have Twitter or Facebook. I’d happily be one of the anonymous site readers. I don’t have the sweaty, desperate need to have myself and my opinions validated by having them be posted online.
I love to write, but every day I wish I had an ordinary, offline job so I didn’t have to live with the fear of assholes Googling me and, giggling, share his finds with the rest of the anonymous horde, or use it to surprise me on the street one day. (Would you like to hear the story of the guy who had my address — which, to my horror, I discovered was now online — and threatened to cut my face off?) Tell me, Vince, in all your Psych 101 babbling, did you ever think how *scary* it is for a woman out there? Or did you actually miss that part of this piece? As someone who essentially confessed to stalking in the name of pseudo-science, I’m guessing you didn’t.
But at least we can agree on one thing — you don’t really know what’s going on in my life or my love life. And you’ve definitely been blinded by something…but it wasn’t candor.
I’d echo “fascinating stuff” but to be honest, this was just the same old ugly routine, dressed up in new grammar.
That IS totally my luck.
I remain disappointed in his use of anime smileys though.:(
While other commenters have noted, the person that sent you the e-mail may not have been of age or even a male, I would like to say that it is people like this that ruin talking to chicks for people like me.
I have not been married for over twenty years, as I am not even thirty yet, and have in fact met the majority of my past girlfriends on the internet. After graduating college, it was pretty hard to meet girls as talking to them at bars was hit or miss, I only have a few close friends so being hooked up wasn’t really an option, and being a manager at a movie theater where, even if it was permitted to date subordinates, usually consisted of 17-18yr olds, so I wasn’t really interested. And it sucked cuz the few dudes that send annoying little notes like that, or worse, pics of penises or whatever, get to the girls first and really turn them into cynics. I would send perfectly normal messages trying to strike up regular conversation and get quickly disregarded just because they had recieved too many: “Yo gurl letz MAKEOUT,” prior to me trying to talk to them.
This probably wasn’t what you were talking about exactly in your post, but I just wanted to say that I can (kind of) see where you are coming from and totally do NOT think it’s acceptable for guys to be so mysterious/creepy/gross on the internet and that we’re not all like that.
The guy sends an unobtrusive email maybe hoping to strike up a correspondence, and because he put a smiley on it, that makes him a serial killer? Then the talkbalks abound with you skewering anyone reacting to your intentionally provacative post. Not sure what your point is, wow, Clint Eastwood circa 1975 and Bradley Cooper have not asked you out in exactly the way you have envisioned…we are all very sorry.
Did you miss the part where some random person got her info, sent an email anonymously, and the fact that’s creepy as shit? And how did you miss the joke where it would’ve been swell to have Bradley Cooper find her card, etc., but in reality the world is a fucked up place?
I’m sorry, but that dinosaur is still freaking me out. Well maybe not the dinosaur itself, more the little black thing on its back right in the centre. What is it, and WHY IS IT SMILING AT ME?!
Anyway… PintelGuy, you’re absolutely right. Preaching to the choir here, my friend.
Personally I blame nightclubs. 70% of face-to-face communication is non-verbal (at least I know it’s around there somewhere. I’m too hungover tired to google it) except in nightclubs, where it’s 100%, because that racket they blare out of the speakers makes talking impractical at best and impossible at worst. And since a big chunk of the male/female interaction in this day and age takes place at these bocas del infierno there is a whole generation who don’t know how to actually talk to someone of the opposite gender, particularly when body language and facial expressions become moot (as they do online). Couple this with the fact that the goal of most of the interactions that do occur is either a meaningless snog or a back-alley knee-trembler and it becomes clear that the human race is doomed. Doomed, I tell you!
Whatever happened to Semisonic? Sorry, I’ve got a 90s station on the radio. Time for my Ritalin.
Elisabeth, the reason sweet Granny Rappe didn’t have to worry about stalkers and roofies is the same as the reason why you shouldn’t have to: people are supposed to respect each other. As I see it, respect for other people is an extension of respect for yourself, and respect for yourself is borne out by the ability to express yourself in a confident manner while still acknowledging your own shortcomings. Unfortunately, it seems that confident self-respect has been superceded by arrogant self-delusion. T’internet has made the world a smaller place, and some people think they need to shout louder to be heard. Those of us in the know, however, realise that we don’t need to be heard at all. But it can be kinda nice when we are.
Getting back to the movies for a sec, the most unrealistic yet emulatable chat-up I can think of has got to be Andy Garcia in Things To Do In Denver When You’re Dead. The “does he make you thump?” bit. That’s Old Hollywood; you can almost imagine Tracy and Hepburn doing that scene. In the real world you might get laughed out of the place for that, but it’s got more style than “Hi Elisabeth, I’m Ryan. Can I buy you a beer?”
But hey, what the fuck do I know?
This made me smile on a Sunday morning. Thanks (T__T) heh.
This was an entertaining piece. But seriously, what normal, grown-up man would really be super-enticed by a Lara Croft business card? Not to insult you, Elisabeth, I enjoy your writing alot, and I’ve seen pictures of you, you’re very attractive. But obviously, only a dorky, quirky, slightly loserish guy would even spend the time sending an email (and then sending the object of his affections some wierdo T-Rex picture). In this case, no news would have been good news. Keep the scribbler coming…
I’m still having trouble with the ” I loathe working online. It’s the job I have, so I do it, but I hate that having a byline opens me up to individuals such as yourself. I have no interest in being an open book. If I didn’t need to post links and interact with readers, I wouldn’t have Twitter or Facebook.”
You know how this works right? Excuse me for turning into Mr. Pink here, but boo fucking hoo.
I bet it also sucks when guys say, “I love you.” I always operated under the idea that even if you don’t want to go to the party it’s nice to be invited. But then again it could have turned out to be a Saw movie. But then again, I find that women are annoyed when they are hit on by men they consider bellow them. It’s sort of like a guy who can’t return the affections of a fat girl who is hitting on them (assuming that is the quality they dislike). Maybe everyone’s standards are just so damn hi that it becomes impossible to meet new people in world with new people who want to live out their own Meg Ryan/Tom Hanks movie.
But yeah, that email smells of 15 year old. Good call.
My grammar and spelling sucks this morning. My bad.
That’s it, I’m getting new business cards tomorrow. Email address: removed. Phone numbers: removed. Hell, I’m even going to take my name off: you can’t be too careful.
The above comment’s pretty fun.
Back to what I was saying prior, I was merely annoyed by a perceived tone of the piece. If you somehow take it as support of antagonizing a lovely young woman, then you can go fuck yourselves.
FYI, guys no one is ruining talking to “chicks” for you, you are doing it to yourself. Posting in a comment section, or an article written by a woman, hoping to curry favor, is going to get you nowhere fast, in fact you have already lost when you started typing your “feelings”. I’m going to give you some advice, the only advice you need to picking up women…ready? Ask them questions about themselves. That’s it. What better way to get a girl talking than to get them to discuss their favorite topic…themselves…no, seriously…If you ask them a reasonable question like “That is an interesting looking drink, what is it?” and they don’t answer, you’re done, leave, no, run…if she answers with a smile and doesn’t look to her friend and start talking to them, ask a follow up question. If she keeps talking and her answers get longer and longer you are on to something. Keep asking questions. You willl be tempted to blather on about some stupid shit about yourself, but remember, she does not give a fuck about what you think…not yet at least…here is where the skill comes in…you want to pepper her answers with one or two sentences that show you have some knowledge about what she is talking about(if you don’t just admit that you have no idea, lying will get you nowhere), but go right back to the questions. If you go into some long story, no matter how interesting YOU think it is, you’re finished. The only time you want to talk about yourself at length is when she has run out of things to talk about regarding her amazingly intricate existence. Most likely, the night will be ending before this happens(women love to talk about what makes them happy, sad, angry), so be prepared to sit, nod, smile, and laugh when appropriate. This is when you strike. Tell her how much you have enjoyed your “discussion”(ha!) and that you’d like to do it again sometime…now either ask for her number or…if you’ve been asking great questions and making her feel like she can tell you anything, she will ASK YOU to get together again. Here’s the tricky part, you can parlay this enthusiasm into a real date(if you are really on your game, you can ask her to go to another bar or for a bite to eat that same night), but don’t wait a week to call. Call her the next day. If you wait “5 days” or some arbitrary number you think will make you look cool, you just lost her, or at least made her think you don’t really like her. After that, next time you get together…ask more questions!!! Rinse, repeat. Just don’t let her see her your eyes glaze over, eventually she will get bored off talking about herself and that’s when the fun begins(sex! Lots of it!) and love… so much love….just be careful because if you aren’t really into her, these powers can back fire on you and then you’ve got yourself a stalker(yay!?)…. you’re welcome…that is all.
I’m gonna get business cards created then discard them frivolously in supermarkets. Yeah mate!
I had no idea this was supposed to be funny until I read the talkbacks. I would quote Community and say that there was a time for subtly, but that time was before Scary Movie. I would say that but that would get Elizabeth mad at me, maybe not as mad as shushing her in the theater or sending her an anime smiley face, but mad nonetheless.
I wouldn’t discount the possibility of her being mad at you for spelling her name wrong.
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.