Entertainment Weekly has a whole new spread of the upcoming The Amazing Spider-Man reboot, starring their cover boy, Andrew Garfield. Also starring in Marc Webb’s redo are Emma Stone, Rhys Ifans, Denis Leary, Campbell Scott, Irrfan Khan, Martin Sheen and Sally Field. The Amazing Spider-Man 0pens in 3D and 2D on July 3, 2012.
via Coming Soon and EW.com















12 comments
Why the hell does he look like the guy from Twilight (first shot). That greatly annoys me to no end.
Sorry that my first ever CHUD post is to disagree with you. He doesn’t look like a Twilighty. He looks like a Norman Bates! Am I wrong?
The chrome lenses and the shooters are going to remind all us old farts of the Nicholas Hammond version.
I’ve never bitched about a super hero costume before a movie comes out but I’m going to right now. I really hate how long and vertical all of the accents (the red middle, the spider) are. I feel like his nipples should be peeking out from the sides of that red center as it drops down and cups Spidey’s balls like a bathing suit Borat would wear.
Too “sexy alien” for my tastes.
I agreed with Mr. Q up until he started talking about nipples and ball cupping; don’t know if I quite like the costume, but I think it COULD be a minor gripe if the story, acting, etc., is top notch stuff in the end. I do enjoy Spider Man, even if I’m not the biggest of fans, either way. Good luck to all involved and I do hope it does well, especially so close to the end of the Toby Maguire series.
I had (and still have) reservations about Tobey, but at least he didn’t look like a freaking giraffe.
You are a strange man.
LOVING these photos! Tobey was great and all, but he just didn’t LOOK enough like Peter for my tastes. This guy looks EXACTLY like how he’s drawn in the comics. Don’t believe me? Clicky here: http://www.comicbookmovie.com/images/users/uploads/10377/peterparker.jpg
Ah, the old web-shooter bullshit.
This is a Simple Concept:
Peter Parker is poor as shit. It’s a cornerstone of his challenges as a superhero.
If this kid can invent an artificial spider web that can shoot from tiny wrist capsules and are strong enough to take the G-Forces he subjects them to – PATENT IT, SELL IT, GET RICH AND BE A SUPERPOWERED BATMAN YOU CUNT.
He doesn’t even have to sell it and channel the resultant huge funds into crime-fighting. The invention and philanthropic application of a material like artificial webbing would literally make his ENTIRE WORLD a better place than 100 lifetimes worth of him swinging around the city beating up hoods.
Fuck “Old School” if it’s bullshit. “Old School” isn’t a mark of value in and of itself.
That’s the problem with every logical argument about characters that were created for children, decades ago and written about by a succession of writers on tight deadlines. “Sure I buy that a guy could walk on walls and have some sort of eccolocution/esp…or that another guy would ride around on a jet powered mechanical bat throwing pumpkin bombs…It’s even plausible that a guy could be made of sand or be turned into a humanoid lizard, I’m cool with that. But INVENTING WEBSHOOTERS and NOT REGISTERING THE PATENT? That’s just SILLY…”
i like everything except the reflective eyes.
Don’t be a twit, this is a story about a kid who’s bitten by a radioactive spider, so how’s that for old-school logic. Being that arbirary and shoe-horning today’s context doesn’t work in these films.
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.