
First things first: I love and worship AMC. I don’t like that I have to say what I’m about to. I rave about the network to anyone in earshot. Now…
AMC, how the fuck do you fuck this up?
You have Mad Men, a brilliant show that has reached an alarming amount of people despite the fact it’s textured, subtle, and nearly free of most of the staples of a TV watcher’s diet. You have a show for the ages, a classy bit of art that America has no right expecting on the tube. AMC had the balls and the luck to allow a Mad Men to happen and what was the main bit of coverage about the show over the half-past year pertaining to?
Contract squabbles. Budget issues. Cutting the show’s running time for more product placement.
A lot of those issues have been squashed and the show’s star is locked in for three more years. That’s great for AMC, but Mad Men should never had been an issue. It should have been protected and cherished. No one watches television stations because of the ads, the name of the network, the executive in charge, or because the network has a cool logo and slogan. They watch it for shows. When you have a Man Men you treat it like a little celluloid pope and surround it with shields and slaves and loving handlers. Mad Men ran into heat regarding money.
But the network allows The Killing to continue. And cost money. It’s an all-out shitstorm of a show and if it takes up $39.99 that would be better served keeping the good programming on the air then The Killing needs to be its own next victim. And unsolved. Fuck that show. It’s like a cocktease of a cocktease and then when it’s finally time to consummate it’s Jaye Davidson.
↔
Then there’s The Walking Dead (our reviews of season one). A terrible show. A really weak show that people have supported because it exists. Zombies! On TV! Big deal. It’s not a good show. But it’s very lucrative, so good. It helps the network and there’s always the chance they’ll get it right (ie: veer as far away from the source material as possible post haste) down the line. One can hope. It’s a terrible show but it’s a sensation.
AMC had the balls and the luck to allow a The Walking Dead (our outtakes) to happen and what was the main bit of coverage about the show over the past half-year pertaining to?
Contract squabbles. Budget issues. The showrunner leaving, and it’s rumored to be because of money.
The Walking Dead is a powerhouse. For advertisers. For ancillary benefits. For ratings. For a network to venture out into other offbeat and potentially lucrative waters. I hate the show and am baffled I do since I love Frank Darabont and it’s filmed in my town. But I understand what it means to a ledger and to a network. It’d be a fool’s errand to risk the goodwill created in the fan community for the show. Now, Frank Darabont’s exit may have nothing to do with money. It may be the result of a power struggle or simply because he actually can’t handle the schedule. Who knows? What we do know is that he wisely shitcanned the writing staff of the first season and that people are jazzed for season two.
You don’t mess with it from a purse strings perspective. You just don’t.
But the network allows The Killing to continue. The television equivalent of smallpox of the polio. My current theory is that The Killing isn’t a show but rather a living thing. And it had compromising photos of everyone in power at AMC engaged in some sort of shunting.
↔
Now comes Breaking Bad (my extensive recent coverage). A juggernaut of a show that has showcased nearly perfect consistency and quality from episode one to this past Sunday’s romp. The show’s creator has said that the next season may be its last. For creative reasons, as a show about this subject has a definitely arc and to run it into the ground would scuttle so much great work. AMC has another golden goose with the show. Its ratings have grown, which is terrific. It’s a critic’s darling, which is terrific. It’s an awards magnet, which is terrific. It is “must see” television, which is terrific. It’s not The Killing, which is terrific.
Cue news (LA Times, The Hollywood Reporter) about the show running into trouble.
Yep, budget issues. Network pressure to trim the episode load. Stupid shit. AMC, what in the name of Dr. Giggles are you thinking? You have a massive hit in the zombie show. You have two of the best television shows EVER in your current queue with the creative team intact and energized and at least another year of guaranteed television gold ahead. You’ve pawned the overly expensive Damages off to Direct TV. [My bad, FX]. You felt so good about The Killing that you renewed its mangy ass for another year.
It’s sit back and admire the breadth of your domain time, not open up the ledger and squeeze pennies out. In reality The Killing shouldn’t be an issue here. I’m ripping it because I hate it and it deserves it. The issue should be that a network has a very diverse array of successful properties, some for material and some for their handle on the zeitgeist. That is a recipe to MAKE money, not a beacon to ruin all that progress over it.
AMC had better get right because it’s a very vital corner of the dramatic television world and believe you me… HBO and Showtime and FX have been paying attention. They’re in this business to win it and they have the horses to pull it off. AMC is no worse a network. It’s time to step up and show it.
HBO has all but said that they’ll support Game of Thrones until George R.R. Martin is done with it.
That’s how you play the goddamn game.
And to lighten the mood, here’s the best thing ever:





14 comments
You and your hate for The Killing. Even though I don’t agree with said hate, I agree with hate for the way AMC is handling the shows that have made it what it is today. AMC would still be a subpar film rerun channel that 73 year-olds watch on Sunday afternoons if it weren’t for this stuff. They are making HBO’s controversial decisions (cancelling Rome, Deadwood, Carnivale etc.) look like tiny blips in recent television history.
Heads up, Nick: Damages was never on AMC. That was an FX show.
Nick, c’mon… “HBO has all but said that they’ll support Game of Thrones until George R.R. Martin is done with it.” Yeah, but they didn’t actually say it did they? Hell no. They even added a caveat that when they feel the “show” story ends it might not be when the “book” story ends. If Thrones gets too costly for them, and the rating tank, they would cancel it in a heartbeat. Nothing is guaranteed ever. Remember that multi-year pick up Always Sunny got? Good for them, but sure as shit if the ratings took a huge nosedive, they’d cancel it. Farscape ghad a two season commitment on Sci-Fi and was cancelled one season in. Talking the talk and walking the walk are two different animals.
Seems to me they are using the Marvel movies method: aim for good product but keep those budgets tight and the contracts tighter… because while good product is great it doesn’t always mean $$$.
Game of Thrones is going to be a monster when the second season begins. A ratings soaring monster.
I’m sure it will be. and I’m glad. I hope it lasts 5-? seasons and covers all the books in grand style. But if for whatever reason come seasons 3 or 4, if rating dive or costs skyrocket, HBO wouldn’t continue it just because 3 years ago it said it would. I’m all for quality and loosening the purse strings, but I understand when it doesn’t happen.
I just wrote about this in the Breaking Bad thread here, nice to see an expanded take.
I understood the contract issues with Mad Men: it’s never gotten the ratings to match the critical acclaim. But The Walking Dead and Breaking Bad have the numbers, and Breaking Bad has the acclaim as well. If you’re having money problems, you put two in the eyes of The Killing and spread its money around.
Suggesting that Breaking Bad cut its next season order in half is asinine insanity. It makes me think that in a couple years when Mad Men and Breaking Bad are gone, that AMC will slink back to being an afterthought of a network.
And yeah, Damages went from FX -> DirecTV. The new season on DirecTV has been terrific, btw – all the twists and turns with added profanity, nudity and Goodman. AMC is getting outclassed by DirecTV these days, and they aren’t even a network!
Game of Thrones is too depressing. Mad Men is plain boring. Killing is one of the few shows I completely abandoned after only a couple episodes. Breaking Bad is magical. And I’m a complete Walking Dead apologist. Of course, I side with nick and I abandoned the comic after about 4 issues. The show has promise though.
AMC is chapping me man, CHAPPING ME!
“Mad Men is plain boring.”
If you have a really terrible and wrong-headed opinion you may want to keep it to yourself.
I’ve yet to see a single episode of Mad Men. Looks like I’ll have to change that.
Nick, I was having a similar discussion yesterday about AMC and how over the last few years, they have managed to take away the golden gun of “excellent cable TV drama”, stick it up the asses of HBO and Showtime, and laugh as they pull the trigger. How did they do it? By airing shows that expanded as far across the field of genres as possible. People who watch AMC’s shows don’t always agree upon which is the best. But, there is something there for everyone. And watching the network handle shit like this, only one word comes to mind: Amateurs. Remember that documentary “Who the &%* is Jackson Pollack?” AMC is getting ready to use its art for target practice and not even realize what it is they are doing.
ditto. Breaking Bad is easily my favourite TV show ever, I obsess more than is healthy over it and everyone I know that has seen both says Mad Men is up there. I need to make some headway into this (after this season of Breaking Bad has finished naturally)
A lot of networks are cutting back on this stuff. 12 episode seasons are now only 10, or 8, or even 6. These shows are monumentally expensive for these networks, who don’t have a ton of money to begin with. Just because they’re critical darlings doesn’t mean they bring in big money for cable networks. I’m not defending dunderheaded decision making by any of these cable channels, but its the reality of the world we live in now.
God, yes. The new season of Damages is incredible. It’s got its best cast yet, a longer run time, boobs, and curse words! Dylan Baker is killing it.
Seems like they would make more of their money on DVD sales and the like…how much do they garner from Netflix and OnDemand services? I know a lot of people catch it that way.
As far as THe Wire goes, wasn’t that only marginally successful as far as total viewers? I remember hearing HBO say that they liked it so much that they would stand by it for the sake of the art. Now it must be a little cheaper to produce than Carnivale, but still.
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.