It’s always the argument against those who bitch about remakes that they, along with bad sequels, don’t take away your ability to enjoy the original. I think we’ll all agree though, that incessant pounding on a franchise or character can eventually have the effect of diluting the potency of the original, or miring it in so much baggage that watching it in a vacuum becomes difficult. Silence of the Lambs has been put to that test over the last 20 years, and that will continue as an hour-long prequel television show is being put together and will join the three theatrical follow ups to the original Oscar winner. Written by the guy behind Dead Like Me and Pushing Daisies, Bryan Fuller, the production is actually backed by a French studio that is pushing out into worldwide production.
According to Deadline, the show will “explore the early relationship of Thomas Harris’ signature character, renowned psychiatrist Dr. Hannibal Lector, and his patient, a young FBI criminal profiler named Will Graham, who is haunted by his ability to empathize with serial killers.”
Obviously this is riffing on the part of the timeline that falls around Red Dragon, one of the three movies to toy with the character since Silence of the Lambs (I didn’t see Rising, so I can’t say how that might fit). And while those movies are not all uniformly awful (and granted, based on the original author’s books), they’ve certainly robbed the first film of the power it draws from Hannibal Lecter’s singular creepiness. Having seen him at all ages and in so many places, the imagery of the character is no longer restricted to the glass prison. That doesn’t ruin Silence of the Lambs, but it does make it a little less special.
But perhaps a different format will bring something fresh to the character and that story. Long-form TV shows are really only as good as their writing, so an excellently paced and developed show may be in the works that is simply branded in and around this long-recognizable franchise. Again, that won’t do much to help the dilution of Silence, but at this point what is there left to save?
Is there anything left to mine from the story of this particular cannibalistic psycho, or would sleeping dogs have been better left lying?
(via Dark Horizons and Deadline)





6 comments
This will stink, just like Hannibal Rising.
SECOND film, Renn. “Manhunter” was the first.
My Hannibal picks:
Alexis Denisof (February 25, 1966)
Anthony Stewart Head (February 20, 1954)
James Marsters (August 20, 1962)
Tim Roth (May 14, 1961)
Christoph Waltz (October 4, 1956)
P.S. The first person I thought of was Ian McShane but, according to his IMDB page, he’ll be 70 next year.
Vol. 2
Daniel Day-Lewis (April 29, 1957)
Gary Oldman (March 21, 1958)
Guy Pearce (October 5, 1967)
James Purefoy (June 3, 1964)
Dominic West (October 15, 1969)
Such a stupid, stupid idea. Will not be bothering with it at all.
I’ll stick with my Anthony Hopkins trilogy, thank you.
Hannibal Rising was goofy (Hannibal’s trained in the ways of the samurai!!! That’s why he stands so still! No way! Yes way, Ted!!)
And while Manhunter came first, it loses points because of the awful music and because some of the acting appears as if the actors are reading off of cue cards, which kills it for me (especially Tom Noonan, who I felt was bested by Ralph Fiennes in Red Dragon).
What about Fuller’s Munsters reboot that was happening? At least that sounds up his alley compared to this disaster in the making.
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.