
Score a win for new media sources, Gary Ross is off Catching Fire.
Deadline and other old studio source outlets did their best to pop the brakes on the story –and to be fair, all signs did kind of suggest that negotiations were still open over the weekend — but ultimately The Playlist’s call that Ross would walk ended up correct. It would seem from here looking back that those negotiations were less open discussions and more last-minute begging on Lionsgate’s part. However it went down, Ross had this to say:
Despite recent speculation in the media, and after difficult but sincere consideration, I have decided not to direct Catching Fire. As a writer and a director, I simply don’t have the time I need to write and prep the movie I would have wanted to make because of the fixed and tight production schedule.
I loved making The Hunger Games – it was the happiest experience of my professional life. Lionsgate was supportive of me in a manner that few directors ever experience in a franchise: they empowered me to make the film I wanted to make and backed the movie in a way that requires no explanation beyond the remarkable results. And contrary to what has been reported, negotiations with Lionsgate have not been problematic. They have also been very understanding of me through this difficult decision.
I also cannot say enough about the people I worked with: Producer Nina Jacobson, a great collaborator and a true friend; the brilliant Suzanne Collins, who entrusted us with her most amazing and important story; the gifted and remarkable Jennifer Lawrence whose performance exceeded my wildest expectations, and the rest of the incredible cast, whom I am proud to call my friends.
To the fans I want to say thank you for your support your faith, your enthusiasm and your trust. Hard as this may be to understand I am trying to keep that trust with you. Thank you all. It’s been a wonderful experience.
Lionsgate replied with a statement expressing regret but perfectly polite assurance that Ross is still in the studio’s good graces.
So here we are back to wondering who might pick up the gig? It’s unlikely they’re going to get a particularly interesting or visionary director to come in and squeeze this thing out, especially now that they’re locked in to shooting it so soon. Frankly, I’m happy to see Ross walk since he shot the film like shit, sold his characters short, and built a remarkably unconvincing world. That’s me. That said, I don’t know that anyone is going to manage doing much better with such a strained schedule- these scenarios never work out well. I get that Lionsgate is in a tough place having to cram this in before First Class 2, or wait much longer than they’d like to get rolling, but if you’re director is walking because there’s not time to get shit together… a long, hard look at schedule and priorities is in order.
Source | The Playlist
Despite recent speculation in the media, and after difficult but sincere consideration, I have decided not to direct Catching Fire. As a writer and a director, I simply don’t have the time I need to write and prep the movie I would have wanted to make because of the fixed and tight production schedule.




5 comments
On the one hand, you would think that after making a ton of money, they could take thier time and do it right. Look at Harry Potter. I don’t recall WB pushing a release date over getting it done right. Say what you will about how faithful they were to the original novels, they really looked fantastic and the main actors really did mature over the succeeding movies.
I can’t comment on the Twilight saga as i’m not in the target audience
But then again, HP was the exception. Hollywood today feels the need to plant their flag on X day and come hell or highwater THAT will be the day the film comes out. It might suck, but so what.
No one seems to remember that Titanic was supposed to be a SUMMER 1997 release. Cameron even gave up part of his back end to make the rollback to December happen and look how that turned out. (He even earned back the money he gave up.)
Whomever takes the job is going to have to put this thing together under an extremely tight schedule and under a lot of pressure and these to forces usually do not a good movie make. But these days quality doesn’t really matter does it? If it did the Kardashian name would only still be associated with O.J.
It’s hard to compare Hunger Games to HP, as the HPs were shot practically back to back and Daniel Radcliffe wasn’t already committed to another successful franchise when he was cast as HP. It does seem to make more sense to wait until Lawrence is wrapped on XMen and use the delay to find a better director and give him/her enough time to prep. Genre fans are willing to wait 3-4 years between Batman films, the 16 year old girls can wait 2 years for Catching Fire.
Wouldn’t mind seeing Gaspar Noe or Lars Von Trier take over directing duties.
But these are age centric-they can not wait four years-Lawrence will be to old and the iron will surely have cooled by then. They should have shot two films at once-then they would have been in a place to release another one next year. Then that would have bought them sometime to put out another two…
That assumes they possess the power of foretelling the future and that they knew THG would be the huge success it’s become.
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.