Dubious though the honor may be, Timur Bekmambetov can now claim a very special title: director of what may well be the ugliest and most thinly-written blockbuster film of the last decade. A tonal catastrophe, Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter mashes up comedy, action, violence, parody, tragedy, horror, romance, and war drama with the same finesse an infant might display shoving legos, k’nex, a discarded action figure arm, and Lincoln logs all into the same dried up mound of play-doh. While these disparate pieces are held together as something you might call a “movie” by the gravity of a solid central performance, at best the film manages only the occasional schlock-level pulse of point-and-laugh-at-it entertainment, and only when it decides to be extra stupid (which granted, is often).
It’s unclear on what level anybody involved understood what kind of movie was being made, so it is a little difficult to entirely write off as an oblivious misfire- perhaps there really is a level of failed parody. Regardless, author/screenwriter Seth Grahame-Smith adapts his own kitschy biography of President Lincoln and proves here that the unraveling stupidity of the Dark Shadows script was no fluke- seems the guy just flat fucking sucks at writing horror mashups. Hell, we all would have been better off if he’d expanded Vampire Hunter into a full-on shameless Blade rip off, rather than just a wack appropriation of that film’s basic dynamic.
Here Graham-Smith is also faced with the challenge of cramming an entire guy’s life into a blockbuster script that not only has no time for the usual pacing and delicacy of a cradle-t0-grave biopic, but also has to carve out plenty of time for spectacle. His solution is to turn the film into an episodic, bullet-point style rundown of notable events in Lincoln’s life (his mother’s death, meeting Mary Todd, getting the political bug, becoming president) that can be easily twisted to involve vampires, and require no real linking throughline beyond “vampires are evil, and they’re out there doing evil vampire shit.” The lead villain and his sidekick are barely worth acknowledging.
While fidelity to historical fact is really quite unnecessary for a movie like this, it should be noted that not only does Vampire Hunter lack the historical depth of even a Wikipedia intro-paragraph, the film’s timeline more resembles what you’d get if you had a 4th grader copy a classmate’s history notes, and then repeated that process half a dozen times. Honestly, I wouldn’t be surprised if the screenplay was scribbled in crayon on handwriting paper.
It’s also not as if the movie’s versions of the players in Lincoln’s life are lent any extra depth or interest by the fictional twist, as they all just kind of bounce around like falling Pinko chips with only their most obvious goals driving them. This kind of bad script goes well beyond mere lame screenwriting, and could only be the result of a novel author trying desperately to condense his full book into a screenplay without any mastery of the tools or understanding of the kinds of decisions that would go into doing so successfully. The block of the film in which Dominic Cooper’s Henry Sturges meets, saves, montage trains, and employs Lincoln as a dispatcher of the undead is a segment that makes it particularly clear that the momentum of the gimmick was much more of a priority than actual characterization or relationship-building.
Taking on this tin-eared mess is director Timur Bekmambetov and his over-eager need to film every page of the script with the eye of Zach Snyder’s reanimated, rotting corpse. Vampire Hunter is packed with all the slow-mo, CGI, and high-concept action stuff you’d expect, with none of the hyper-glossy sophistication of your usual blockbuster. The end product, more often than not, is a digital smear of smoke and dust covering up CGI stunt after CGI stunt, post-converted into one of the most terrible 3D experiences yet projected, and often finished with compositing so bad it would have stood out in Van Helsing. S
peaking of which, Bekmambetov’s film has a lot in common with that 2006 disaster, specifically that the monsters aren’t scary, the horror isn’t horrifying, the action isn’t thrilling, and the humor isn’t funny.
Most of the Bekmambetov’s miscalculations manifest in the harmless absurdity of something like, say, Lincoln chasing/fighting a vampire on top of a herd of horses that stampede for no reason. Unfortunately though, the story of Lincoln inherently requires Bekmambetov to brush up against very real historical tragedies, such as slavery. A demonstration of the director’s finesse with such moments can be seen right in the first scene, in which an evil slave-driver whips young William Johnson and we’re treated to a speed-ramping view of a CGI whip flying through the air and scaring Johnson’s face. The integration of vampirism into the Civil War narrative is handled with similar grace. Some of this shit would border on offensive, were it all not so dumb. I mean, this is the kind of movie that boils down the Union’s Civil War victory to (*dumb spoiler alert?*) the delivery of a bunch of silver to the fields of Gettysburg between the first and second day of the famous battle, so the mostly-vampire Southern troops can actually be killed. That that last sentences reads as much more fun than it actually is to watch is a good primer for what the entirety of Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter is like.
If there’s anything kind to be said of the film, it’s that Benjamin Walker makes for a very solid lead and, along with Mary Elizabeth Winstead, may have been the only one involved in this production who actually understood the idea of tonal consistency. His Lincoln is earnest, warm, and comfortable being a badass, and Walker performs both older and younger Lincoln with a deftness the film can not match on any other level. Winstead too manages to imbue her Mary Todd Lincoln with a frankly unnecessary amount of grace and humor. Everyone else is pretty much terrible, or so sandbagged by the script that they seem terrible.
There’s no doubt that enough mood or mind-altering chemicals and like-humored friends could help one wring a decent time out of this pile of miscalculated shit, but even then the laughs will be forced and infrequent. As for our 16th President, I somehow have the feeling Lincoln’s honor and dignity will manage to endure beyond this slight, but please guys, can we collective decide to not support making this kind of shit a trend?
Rating: 




Out of a Possible 5 Stars





21 comments
Somebody should photoshop an image of Seth Grahame-Smith’s face pasted onto John Wilkes Booth’s mug in that famous drawing of him firing at the back of Lincoln’s head.
Great to see another fearless shitkicking review. I’m converting to this site.
Gwangi — amen
What did you expect from this buffoon Bekmambetov? Wanted was forgettable garbage that I’ve seen once, which was one time too many. And that’s not even touching the actual premise of this stupid movie, which people should’ve protested due to being uninspired shit.
Saw it last night – And I didn’t think it was that bad. I did not see it in 3D. I knew going in, that it wasn’t going to be a great movie, I fully expected a stupid over the top popcorn movie, and that’s exactly what I got. It’s just so goofy, over the top and ludicrous, that it actually worked for me. It was much better than say, Battleship, which was so stupid and tried too hard to be a second rate Transformers.
Good review of a bad movie! I seem to be coming here more an more..
Normally, I’m right with you Renn. But not here. All the things you point out that are wrong about the movie are NONE of the things I remotely care about in this movie. Did Lincoln violently kill lots of vampires in awesome action scenes? You seem to begrudginly admit that he did, except without the “hyper glossy sophistication” that we, in your opinion, should for some reason expect… What?
Try to watch it again without expecting it to do biographical justice to Lincoln’s life, or be a dramatic paen to the woes of slavery. Unnecessary and pretentious for a film like this. When Chud’s review to Abraham Lincoln vs. Zombies shows more awareness of legitimate expectations, the site is in trouble.
This is a Neo-Grindhouse movie and should be viewed as such. Going to this movie expecting Citizen Kane is like going to McDonalds and getting pissed off because they don’t serve Calamari.
Have a look at Asylum’s “Abraham Lincoln vs Zombies” for a surprisingly effective version of Abe kicking undead ass. While Asylum’s output is indeed 99.99% shit, they scored with this one due in large part to Bill Oberst Jr’s portrayal of the President. If ALvZ would have had a significant budget and tightened up some of its loose bits, it could have been a box office contender. Fact.
I wish we could all adjust our expectations as easily as you can, Tim.
The difference is Asylum revels in it’s low-quality schlocky pictures. They make zero apologies for what they all know it is. Whereas AL:VH really want’s it’s audience to immediately place it under cult status and figured the few random parts of the brain lighting up due to it’s mashup category is all you need for that to happen. They will find out this weekend they were dead fucking wrong.
Also Tim Burton is a man who struggles to put out mediocre films on his own. Putting his name on this was probably the loudest dog whistle for people who know better than to sit through this kind of soulless trash.
Here we go, Renn Brown the greatest film critic wunderkind takes a movie called Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter way too seriously.
Maybe we should all go watch a movie he thoroughly enjoyed, Project X, instead.
/84981/review-project-x/
I wonder if there’s a bit of embarrassment at Fox for the mere existence of this thing, especially since it seemed to come together fast. I think they expected to ride a wave of success brought on by a movie adaptation of Pride & Prejudice & Zombies, a wave that never came.
Also, Van Helsing came out in 2004, not 2006.
I think Renn’s complaints were valid to the genre. Just because it’s about the 16th president kicking vampire ass, doesn’t mean it gets to be lazy. And let’s not forget, B movies don’t necessarily demand poor quality, in fact some can be great. Steven Spielberg made them almost exclusivity for a huge chunk of his career.
Pretty sure he’s saying the film took itself too seriously. Just because the premise sounds bad/cheesy that doesn’t mean the film needs to be bad.
Ugh. THE worst argument for the existence of shitty films. It’s not unreasonable to expect a GOOD MOVIE.
Its not so much a question of adjusting expectations, as it is a question of where you got such overly lofty, off-base expectations in the first place…
Was there some promo or trailer that made you expect Shakespearean prose?
Were you shocked and apalled that the vampire killing was not a kitchsy sub-plot, but the focus of the movie?
There are certainly films for which the marketing totally blindsides you as to the film’s true nature (Click, The Breakup), but it doesn’t seem this is one of them.
Renn is clearly angry that this film made it past day 1 of development, at all. His and your opinion that the premise itself is per se “bad”, without needing to see one frame of film, belies the fact that no iteration of this movie would have satisfied you.
This is born out by the fact that he begrudgingly admits all the excellent aspects of the move are indeed there. Both Lincoln and Mary Todd themselves, were excellent and even, goodness gracious, “tonally consistent”. The action delivers. He says everyone else “seems terrible” bc of the script..but guess what? They aren’t.
His perception of the film is overly distorted by high expectations and overall film snobbishness. This is to be expected of reviewers, but what drew me to Chud was both their ability to do it with humor (as opposed to pure disdain found here, normally reserved only for lowest common denominators like Twilight) AND the ability to judge genre films by their own merits, not put them up against IMDb’s top 10.
See previous excellent reviews for Wolfman, Machete, Drive Angry. Maybe Nunziata should do the genre reviews…
Tim…it’s ABRAHAM LINCOLN: VAMPIRE HUNTER.
I’ll say that again: ABRAHAM LINCOLN: VAMPIRE HUNTER.
There are so many other films out there that have earned the right to be defended. This isn’t one of them.
That’s actually my exact argument… Its Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter, it has earned the right to not be attacked for failing to offer things that aren’t vampire hunting…it never promised those things.
Abraham Lincoln: Don’t see it if you expect more than vampire hunting.
There’s no begrudging admittance of any excellence in this movie, least of all for the action. The action is shit. You can tell I think that because I said so.
There is absolutely a version of this movie that would have worked, and it’s one that was actually full of craziness, fun, and funny humor. Instead it’s a big CGI wet fart.
What terrible fucking place have we reached that THIS dull piece of shit is what a genre fan chooses to champion?
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.