USA Today has nabbed the first look at Darren Aronofsy’s Black Swan, a ballet thriller that stars Natalie Portman and Mila Kunis. (“Ballet thriller?”, you might balk- “Suspiria!”, I might exclaim.)

The dark tale with psychological twists stars Natalie Portman as Nina, a technically brilliant ballerina whose life takes some strange turns after being picked as the lead in a New York City production of Swan Lake. Pressures mount as her overbearing mother (Barbara Hershey) pushes her to succeed and her manipulative dance master (Vincent Cassel) commands her to be more seductive and loose in her performance.
Complicating matters is the arrival of Lily (Mila Kunis), a sultry dancer who exhibits all the innate ease and sexuality that Nina lacks. Nina begins to fixate on the newcomer as the two forge an unusual relationship.
The film has already been accepted into the Venice International Film Fest and will kick off on its opening day of September 1st.

If you think that Natalie Portman seems perfect for the role of a dancer, there’s a reason for that. She studied ballet as a child, and trained for six months before shooting this so she could do things right on screen. Says Aronofsky: “Most of these women who are here started dancing when they were 4, 5 or 6 years old. Their bodies are shaped differently because they started so young. She was able to pull it off. Except for the wide shots when she has to be en pointe for a real long time, it’s Natalie on screen. I haven’t used her double a lot.”

Here’s Mila Kunis showing Portman that it’s ok to eat a burger once in a while, cause men like curves.
Kunis didn’t have the benefit of a background in dance, but apparently
worked her ass off (17 pounds of it) to try and look the part. In case the synopsis didn’t tip you off, we’ll be seeing these two women get very close in the film.
Quite a change of pace from The Wrestler! Expect to hear much more about Black Swan over the coming months.





17 comments
My bet is "Kunis = Figment" in this film.
A Portman/Kunis sex scene in a movie directed by Aronofsky? Consider my ticket bought.
This film really could have used a more attractive lead actress to go tit-to-tit with Kunis.
'unusual relationship', i.e. carpet munching. SPOILER: #1 is right
Monty – why even say that? If that is a spoiler, you are a desperate, stupid cunt. I knew nothing about this film and wanted to keep it that way, and it looks like you just spoiled something. In a fucking Comments section under an article. For what? And number 4 too – why on earth would you fucking post that shit? And why would the mods let it get posted? You tiny, pathetic fucking losers.
Didn't know Kunis and Portman had signed a contract with Girlfriends Films, the finest supplier of lesbian adult entertainment!!
I thought that "Kunis as figment" was part of the initial pitch for the movie? I seem to remember it being mentioned in every early synopsis, so my take is that Portman may/may not be imagining her rival is, like, the plot, not the twist. Like in SHUTTER ISLAND or INCEPTION–the unreality is implicitly acknowledged early on and the question becomes how far gone the protagonist really is.
Some one needs a nap
Jim, don't be so fucking precious and stupid. If someone posts 'My bet is "x = y" in this film' on some shitty talkback, the likeyhood of it being real is up there with a Japanese racing driver winning a Grand Prix, ie. pretty fucking thin. All you've done with your little whine is make yourself look like a bigger cunt than that Monty chap could ever hope to be. Now shut up and fuck off.
I'm a little confused about who this Aronofsy guy is??
If you happen to see him at the track, I'd steer clear of #9 and his awful comprehension of probability.
I'm with Jim. Why even risk spoiling a film unless you're an attention-whoring twit? People who pull shit like that are the trash in any movie community. And I don't know what your deal is, R. You're just stirring more shit.
yeah Jim, calm the fuck down. It's just film speculation…
i hope she fake-goes-down on natalie portman better than she acts
You're a witless tool, #9, but by all means keepbleating. It's hilarious. The angry dude is 100% correct. Disproportionately angry, but correct all the dame. You sanctimonious fuckhole.
How is speculating that kunis is a figment a spoiler? seriously explain that to us. and if you haven't even considered that possibility already you don't deserve to watch movies. oh and here's another "spoiler" for you, I think portman is a cylon.
Wow, I think I learned some new swear words today. Thanks for that…
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.