IESB’s Robert Sanchez is super tight with Fox’s Tom Rothman. Unfortunately for Robert, that hasn’t been worth so much lately, as Fox has just been shitting steaming turds onto celluloid for the last couple of years. But now that Rothman is facing the fact that his studio is falling apart like the McCain campaign, he’s trying to do some course correction. Part of that course correction involves getting back into the Marvel superhero game in a big way.
Robert sat down with Rothman recently for an interview, and during the course of that interview the rumored reboot of Daredevil came up. The upside: it’s happening, but Rothman won’t say when. The funny side: Rothman, known as a micro-manager and probably the least director-friendly exec in Hollywood, is claiming that he wants a ‘visionary’ on the film. Christopher Nolan gets name-dropped.
IESB: Would you do Daredevil as dark as The Dark Knight?
TR: Would it be as dark? I don’t know because what it really needs is, it needs a visionary at the level that Chris Nolan was. It needs someone, it needs a director, honestly, who has a genuine vision. What we wouldn’t do is just do it for the sake of doing it. Right? What we try to do is to get a creative engine for it, that really had a great vision for it, that’s what we would look for.
And then once that creative engine was hired, Rothman would endlessly meddle with it, and possibly send Richard Donner to set to ghost direct the thing.





17 comments
This could be somewhat unique in the superhero film genre if they actually focus on the acrobatics and the movement of the human form instead of cutting it up or replacing it with CGI like the Batman & Spider-Man movies have done.
Just get a decent fight choreographer, whoever set up the fights for dark knight was terrible.
I could have come up with better stuff, no BS.
I am actually fond of the Affleck/Gardner meet cute that is Daredevil. Just like I don't hate the Adam West Batman. However, the source material was whitewashed for that movie. Matt Murdock never had to make the really hard choices in the movie. Hell, as a kid he was blinded by chemicals and could suddenly kick the ass of his rogue gallery of bullies…at least the sharks ass was kicked while they were jumping it. But as far as tone…yes, Daredevil could fit along those lines of the Dark Knight. Also at this point, Marvel already has three reboots (Hulk, Punisher, Punisher part deaux) but is this going to provide the coin and paper that Tom Rothman is looking for? I get the feeling he is looking at the box office for the Dark Knight and not the box office of the Incredible Hulk. We all love Daredevil but does that housewife in Barstow know who he is? She knows Spider-man and Batman. My point is this: if Daredevil is going to happen, don't count on mad box office. If it is going to be done find a guy as passionate as Mark Steven Johnson with Chris Nolan's eye and obvious need to sexually molest a film like the all time crime classic Heat. May I also suggest a crazy ladt called Typhoid Mary as love interest/villain?
Did donner really Ghost direct Wolverine? What's the deal with that? I know his trailer was onset n' all but still. Anyone gotta the skinny on what really went down there?
Regarding Daredevil, its an unfairly maligned superhero film. Flawed as hell, but not as bad as people make it out to be. Nowhere near as bad the those terrible fantastic four films or elektra. Talk about "just doing it for the sake of doing it".
Well Richard Donner is married to the producer of the X-Men movies, which may explain his presence. Seems weird that he'd shit on another director in that way after what happened to him on Superman 2. Then again, he directed Timeline. The man is clearly a monster.
Seems like the really successful franchises outside of X-Men have some kind of personal tragedy as the motivating factor for the protagonist strapping on a costume and kicking criminal ass. What's Daredevil's? He went blind as a kid and now has heightened senses? So what?
Daredevil's father was a boxer who wouldn't take a dive and was murdered by organized crime, you putz.
@Just wondering : personal tragedy – Superman, Fantastic Four, Iron Man, Hulk… not so much…
More subtle Dark Knight bashing…YAY!! How clever!
What shitty writing!
Stop eating please, Mr. Fat-toes.
AND IT WOULDNT BE CHUD.COM WITHOUT THE CLEVER DARK KNIGHT BASHING AND RIBBING ALL THINGS REPUBLICAN…."LOOK, IM VOTING FOR THE BLACK GUY! SEE HOW PROGRESSIVE I AM!"
masonreloaded – that's bullshit. Superman's planet exploded. fantastic four, reed has to deal with the fact he turned his family into monsters, iron man he is on the verge of death by his own devices, hulk – he saved a life at the cost of his own, something he'll think about forever.
"@Just wondering : personal tragedy – Superman, Fantastic Four, Iron Man, Hulk… not so much…"
Superman: His planet sorta blew up, and he's the last of his kind. That's not less a personal tragedy than having your parents gunned down in front of you.
Fantastic Four: For a while, in the comics at least, Reed was pretty guilt-stricken with turning Ben into monster, and there was a lot of focus on finding a cure for him.
Iron Man: He has to wear a suit to keep himself alive. That's a bit of a personal crisis I would think.
Hulk: Turns into an uncontrollable monster that he can't seem to get rid of, and he got to be the way he is because he was saving the life of some jackass teenager that was goofing around on a bomb testing range.
Of course, there are some superheroes that do their thing because they want to or because of just being in the right place at the right time (Green Lantern was picked at at random and given one of the most powerful weapons in the universe), but YOUR examples are pretty terrible.
Comment #10 unknown user – You are a filthy bigot!
Devin, two things…
1) Chris Nolan will be remembered for having contributed something to film culture, you won't.
2) McCain's campaign is not falling apart. The majority of idiots WILL vote McCain/Palin. Oh, excuse me, PALIN/McCain.
Because creativity is an engine…
I can only see Val Kilmer playing Daredevil, but he'd seriously have to lose some weight he's looking rough lately.
Yes, DD deserves a reboot more than any of the others. The first DD was a tragedy, he's supposed to be Marvel's Batman, a street hero.
One guy that fits the profile and could be had for cheap is Guy Pearce. They wasted both of the best villains in the first one, but one villain with some big screen potential is the Owl.
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.