There was a surprise for WonderCon attendees who made it all the way through the Warner Bros panel Saturday – Christopher Nolan himself took the stage to introduce an extended trailer from his upcoming film Inception.
The clip and the Q&A session afterwards seem to have unlocked the most basic mysteries about the plot of Nolan’s secretive new film. Leonardo DiCaprio plays an Extractor – someone who sneaks into the dreams of others and steals ideas from their subconsciousness. It’s the ultimate corporate spying. Leo’s not just any Extractor, though – he’s the best there is, and he’s so good that he teaches other people how to guard their subconsciousness from other Extractors. That seems to be what he’s doing with the very wealthy Ken Watanabe… with ‘seems’ being the operative word. Inception isn’t just a science fiction movie about going into other people’s dreams (there also seems to be an element of constructing dreams), it’s also a heist film. From what little I could gather from the trailer, it looks like Watanabe might be a classic mark, setting himself to have his ideas stolen by Leo and his gang. And over the course of the movie it looks like Leo puts together a whole team; the extended trailer showed him hiring Ellen Page, apparently still a student, and saying that he needed a forger.
It also showed action – a chase through what appeared to be a Morrocan street, a taxi cab shoot out, and a snowy mountain scene that included skiing, automatic weapons, bunkers and rappelling down an icy cliff face. But the action felt like it was taking a backseat to something that interests Nolan much more – the form and function of dreams.
At the Q&A after the footage screened, Nolan said that he was shooting the dreams very gritty, realistic and quasi-documentary in feeling. The point for him is that dreams feel real to us as dreamers, and so they must feel real to us as audiences as well. He’s eschewing trippy stuff in favor of psychologically-oriented surrealism. One scene in the trailer had Leo running between two buildings that are slowly coming together, trapping him. What I was reminded of was the real but odd dreamworld of Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind.
It was interesting seeing Nolan in one of his very few convention appearances, as he has a very cold demeanor while taking questions. This is WonderCon, so the people coming up to the mic where all but shaking with excitement, and quick to tell him how much The Dark Knight meant to them. One guy told Nolan he was the guy’s favorite director ever; Nolan took it with a tight smile and a nod of his head. Nolan’s wife and producer, Emma Thomas, was sitting next to Nolan, beaming at each compliment.
That distance is what has put me off from many of Nolan’s movies but what makes this look to be his most promising since Memento. Inception is literally about ideas, and Nolan works best when he’s engaging concepts over emotions. In fact Inception, with its combination of massive set pieces and cerebral meditations on dreams as not just mechanisms for understanding the world but also possibly as the source of ideas in the first place, feels like the perfect Nolan film. During the Q&A Nolan made the obligatory nod towards Star Wars as a film that influenced him as a filmmaker, but he made it clear that he’s a child of Ridley Scott, not George Lucas. Blade Runner is his movie; other directors he talked about were Kubrick and Malick – all guys whose aesthetic choices can sometimes be more powerful than their emotional ones. Inception looks like it fits well with the works of those directors (well, maybe not quite Malick).
The other aspect of Inception that intrigues me from a Nolan perspective is the fact that it’s a heist movie. If Nolan was working with his brother, Jonathan, I’d be convinced that the film was going to be clockwork tight as a good heist movie must; after all, they’re the duo who brought us Memento. But this is Nolan’s first solo screenwriting credit since his debut feature, Following, way back in 1998. Which of the brothers was really responsible for the way that movie clicks together on future viewings? The conventional wisdom is that Jonathan wrote the original story, Memento Mori, that inspired the film, written by Christopher. If that’s the case, Inception could be brilliantly put together, as Memento remains Nolan’s best and smartest film to date. If not, it would be The Prestige, a diverting but ultimately cheap story without resonance or reason to exist past a first viewing.
I suspect it’s more like Memento. Watching the footage and listening to Nolan talk I found myself getting more and more excited about the possibilities of this film. The locations alone – six countries – will be enough to make Inception worth watching. Nolan shot on a mix of 35mm and 65mm (he thinks 65, short of IMAX, is the best film stock available), which will only enhance the visuals. And there are a number of fine actors looking very good in many well-shot scenes.
But what really makes Inception feel special is the fact that Nolan’s still excited about it. Well into post-production, after spending years trying to get it off the ground, Nolan’s chilly demeanor cracked when he got on the subject of dreams. He’s into the subject, and talked with enthusiasm especially about lucid dreaming – that form of dreaming where you can maintain control of what’s going around you. I think Nolan’s looking to depict dreams in ways that we haven’t seen before, and that he’s going to be doing it seriously.
What will all of that mean without a compelling emotional story? Everything I saw at WonderCon looked amazing, and everything Nolan talked about intrigued me intellectually, but there wasn’t even a hint of anything that would move me emotionally. We learned that Marion Cotillard is playing a character who could be categorized as ‘twisted,’ but will that matter beyond plot points? I think Inception could be a remarkable film, but unless it has a strong emotional center it won’t be a great one.
23 comments
Inception looks really exciting but Christopher Nolan came off like a dick during the panel. Vincenzo Natali was the best part of the whole thing.
take a look at film comment, sight and sound and these collected lists by numerous historians, critics or cinephiles. most of them forget to acknowledge memento as one of the top ten of the past decade. their mistake.
I find the Prestige to be better with each viewing, an easy watch with an ending that still messes with my head. I'm psyched for Inception…and many of the best directors, including Kubrick and Lynch and Scott, are often accused of being too detached. But, like Nolan, their films work through a cumulative effect of the images and ideas, not the characters and arcs.
This film looks really promising… but I'm worried. I've always disliked films where action takes place in dreams. To me, it diminishes dramatic tension, even when they put in the whole "if you die in the dream/matrix/virtual world then you die for real" device. I dunno. I'm willing to have my preconceptions challenged on this one.
You can pretty much guarantee that this flick, even if flawed, will DICK ALL OVER Scott Pilgrim. That looks shit.
we get it you think nolan is good but his films lack emotion.
you got him.
The Prestige is actually a great film.
The Prestige remains one of a small number of films that actually managed to improve upon their source material. The film is vastly better than the book, and it has incredible re-watch value.
"That distance is what has put me off from many of Nolan's movies but what makes this look to be his most promising since Memento" what does Nolan's personal demeanor have to do with his movie making ability?
"The locations alone – six countries – will be enough to make Inception worth watching." …what? If I shot a movie in seven countries would it immediately watchable too? Maybe try the Discovery channel?
I wish he had shot it in IMAX – it's the only thing that reigns in his shaky-cam tendancies in action sequences. TDK's action was much easier to watch than Batman Begins' – mainly because the cameras were so heavy so he had to resort to classicism.
Wow, you're wrong about his need to be a "fun guy" to be an engaging filmmaker. See your own criticism of Kevin Smith for the flipside of that one. And The Prestige? If you think it's heart and soul is that twist, then you are just bringing your own baggage into Nolan's movies. If anything it's about why people do things like make movies. And what filmmaker could NOT have a sense of fun where Nikolai Tesla builds a fucking teleporter in his movie. And then cast David Bowie as Tesla – I know this site's reviewers use the word "delightful" too much, but that's just fucking delightful right there.
For all those getting upset at Devin's persistent picking on Nolan, take a moment to thnk about the site you're on. CHUD specialises in personal opinion, not objective film criticism. We come here to read his amusing and shamelessly biased rants, not balanced and fair reviews. The main thing to take form this is that Devin doesn't like Nolan as a person or a filmmaker, but is still excited by the prospect of this movie. Praise indeed. (Oh, and by the way, Devin – maybe he seemed 'cold' because he is a shy person who is uncomfortable talking to a large crowd? We can't all be the life and soul of the party…)
Mathieu:
It seems that CHUD specialises in both personal opinion and objective film criticism. The problem is that it does one or the other when it feels like it or due to the reviewer.
Personally I don't come here for Devin's reviews or articles, I never have. There are many others on here whose writing and opinions I hold in much higher esteem than his.
The problem I find is that sometimes he writes something interesting but I find that most of the time that it is petty, self-opinionated hateful work that would serve better on a blog and not as the output of one of the primary writers on what is now regarded a major internet film site.
It's off-putting but not enough to stop coming here as I would miss the output of the other writers. I just wish that Devin was no longer a major contributor as his attitude is extremely negative, and not even in a fun way. It almost feels like jealousy.
#9: I took "That distance is what has put me off from many of Nolan's movies but what makes this look to be his most promising since Memento" as meaning that Nolan's personal "distance" is reflected in the aesthetics of his films, which I agree with. There's a Kubrick-style emotional distance to a lot of his work. That works for me, personally, but I can see how it would not work for everyone.
This generation could use a Stanley Kubrick-type visionary, and Nolan might just be that kind of director. If conventions were all the rage in Kubrick's time, I bet he would have shined them on, too… but would you call the Grandmaster of filmmaking a dick?
I must also take issue with this all-too-common dismissal of The Prestige. I believe it has immense re-watch value. The film works on so many layers, many of which become more clear on a second viewing. Looking forward to Inception.
Inception sounds very interesting, The Prestige is indeed terrific, and I'm a fan of Memento and the Bat films, but Chris Nolan is no Stanley Kubrick.
"subconciousness" isn't a word.
Neither is "subconsciousness".
The book version of The Prestige is great, and I encourage fans of the movie to read it. Half of the book takes place in modern day, and that half of the plot was excised for the movie. The modern sections of the story show how the feud between the two magicians continues to mess up people's lives, decades later. And the book has a very memorable and genuinely creepy ending. Fun stuff.
I was really exited about The Prestige after seeing the first trailer. But I gotta admit the movie itself was a bit of a letdown. Not a bad movie at all, but far from being anything close to great. Personally I maybe like Memento best of all of Nolans movies, including the two Batmans (some of the best comicbook movies we have, but especially TDK is just overrated imo). Memento is a movie I like to watch again on a regular basis, while I haven't seen The Prestige even once after the first time and I don't really feel like doing it in the near future.
That said, I'm exited for Inception, because I love most of the cast and I like the whole dream setting. Could be great again…!
Chris Nolan's movies are all very dispassionate and cold. Yes, he's technically very proficient and obviously a very smart man. However, his movies all have a coldness to them. I honestly don't care about any of his main characters. The last few especially due to the wooden Christian Bale performances. Maybe Leo can liven things up. BTW, I have the same problems with Fincher and recent Zemekis films. They're all too obsessed with technique over substance.
I watched The Prestige when it was released, then again when it was being shown on cable and I agree that I liked it even more after a second viewing. I now have the desire to watch it again and see how well it holds up on watch #3.
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.