The Principles: George Sluizer (Director). Tim Krabbe (Writer). Bernard-Pierre Donnadieu, Gene Bervoets, Johanna ter Steege.
The Premise: When a young woman, Saskia (ter Steege) seemingly vanishes into thin air, her husband Rex (Bervoets) obsessively spends the next three years trying to uncover what happened to her. Everything comes together when her kidnapper (Donnadieu) introduces himself.
Is It Good: Yes, absolutely. Although the odds are certainly in your favor when you pick up a movie that has “THE CRITERION COLLECTION” emblazoned on the cover.
But, admittedly, I found myself wondering just how I felt about it once the credits rolled. It’s not good in what one might call a “traditional” sense. The story sort of meanders along, going to great lengths to fill you in on every single minute detail that it possibly can. It’s certainly a mystery, but what it offers up aren’t clues (for the most part, the solution to the mystery is revealed to the audience within the first twenty or so minutes). Instead it chooses to inundate you with information, some of it completely pointless to the story and sometimes several times over. Meticulous is a word that comes to mind. Perhaps overly so. And when it finally does come to what should be the climax, it just ends. Abruptly and matter-of-factly. Without any sort of closure or explanation.
But, believe it or not, these are all good things.
The Vanishing is a movie that, on its surface, seems to deliver a “dangers of obsession” message, but in a lot of ways that sells the film short, turning it into a Lifetime Movie Network cliché. Rather than feeling the need to warn the audience, it instead chooses to lead us through the process. Letting us look over Rex’s shoulder as his exhaustive, three-year search for Saskia consumes his entire life, snuffing out practically every other facet of it. And while these things aren’t mined for drama or tension, they’re incredibly engaging. You find yourself at odds with how you feel about what he’s doing. And as the story progresses and you see the choices that both men make (both referring to Rex and Saskia’s kidnapper), you’re not necessarily placed on the sidelines as a spectator, where you can question or condemn the moves they make. You’re in a position to understand them. And because you’ve been led through the process on both sides, you start to feel the same compulsion that they do and you’re left wondering if you wouldn’t have made the exact same choices, had you been put in their place.
It’s a feeling that’s made all the more powerful once you see how it ends. A lot of people take issue with the ending, for a lot of the same reasons that they take issue with the final moments of No Country For Old Men. I, admittedly, had some of the same issues here, but this is a film that requires a bit of thought and digestion and is better served by a bit of distance from your initial viewing. It’s not a movie that uses its ideas to serve the narrative, but rather uses and manipulates the narrative to express its ideas.
Is It Worth A Look: Yes and the sooner the better. It’s a little long but it rarely felt bloated. Again, any excess seems to be exactly the point. Everybody turns in a wonderful performance and Sluizer is able to pull a lot of simple beauty out of some of the more mundane areas of rural France. It’s available on Instant at the moment, so if you have access to that I’d strongly recommend adding it to your queue.
Random Anecdotes: Donnadieu‘s beard is magnificent. Also, and this may have been touched on a bit more in the original book, there seemed to be just a hint of sexual tension between the kidnapper and his daughter – little glances here and smiles there. It may not have been intentional but it certainly helped to add an extra layer of nuance to that character. I’d be surprised if it turned out that Buffalo Bill’s “moving a couch with a broken arm” routine in Silence of the Lambs wasn’t lifted part and parcel from this. And apparently Sluizer remade this film for Hollywood in ‘93. I haven’t seen it but from what I’ve read about it, he should leave that business to Michael Haeneke.
Cinematc Soulmates: No Country For Old Men. Gone Baby Gone.
Tally
So
Far





8 comments
I love this film and agree with alomost everything you've said. Theirs one problem: You forgot the most obvious cinamatic soulmate of "The Vanishing". Another amazing film by the name of:
"Zodiac", If you like one you can't NOT dislike the other.
Yes. "The Vanishing" is an amazing movie. See it. I would also like to add, Avoid the remake with Jeff Bridges at all costs. Horrible.
The Buffalo Bill thing was taken from real life. Ted Bundy did that shit.
@ #2 — I totally disagree about the remake. I think people who have a serious interest in cinema should watch the two versions back to back, for the perfect textbook example of how much stupid you have to hammer into a good movie to make it acceptable by Hollywood standards. In fact, this should be done in film classes.
The remake was on tv last week. And you can safely say the original movie was way better. Just wonder what possessed George Sluizer to direct the remake.
Jeff Bridges is the only reason to watch the remake.
I get how the original is wonderful for horror fans but really I think it's just a nasty little film. I don't even buy that the guy, when faced with the choice, would drink the drink to find out what happened to his missing wife. I mean, how obvious is it that the drink would lead to a slow horrible death? That's not to say that this is a BAD film – it's very good as what it does. Which is to leave the viewer with a horrible uncomfortable feeling of what it must be *SPOILER* to be buried alive. The question to me is: is that a good time at the movies. I'd rather go high-brow and watch Robert Bresson or Carl Theodor Dreyer; or low-brow and watch something wit more thrills and spills. Or something with bigger, better characters and performances. I realise that this movie is regarded as a classic – just offering my personal take.
I like the original more but I think the remake is actually pretty decent. I think the Nancy Travis character is well done… it's just her role in the ending that feels to americanized. If you sit down and watch them back to back one night you will find yourself liking "some" stuff in the remake more. Example being the fantastic score.
ps just like watching both versions of Funny Games!
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.