Prince of Persia could be the best video game movie ever made. Which is faint praise, indeed, as pretty much every other video game movie has been rancid. Persia, though, manages to break the streak by being merely ho hum. A slightly tedious attempt to create a sandier version of Pirates of the Caribbean, Prince of Persia is a loud and highly art-designed trifle, stuck with two leads who have all the chemistry of oil and water.
Jake Gyllenhaal, sometimes affecting an English accent so bad you keep expecting him to say ‘Wut wut, guv’nor?’ (and I say sometimes because the accent very much comes and goes from scene to scene), is Prince Dastan, raised from the slums by the kindly King of Persia. Dastan has two brothers (by other mothers) and a jealous uncle (the film tries to make it a reveal when Sir Ben Kingsley gets evil. It doesn’t work), and he grows up to be a rash but good-hearted warrior. Events occur, as they will, and the Persian army assaults some holy city despite the King’s wishes, and Dastan ends up with a magic knife and being framed with the assassination of the King. There’s a whole bunch of other bullshit and time travel and jumping and more CGI than you thought possible and then the movie ends.
We’re supposed to believe that Gyllenhaal is in love with Gemma Arterton, playing a beautiful princess tasked with protecting that magic knife, but even the movie has a hard time suspending that disbelief. Matters aren’t helped by the fact that the script’s attempt to give them a banter-filled, quippy relationship is played out as just two preening bitches going at it. Director Mike Newell keeps putting Arterton in amazing outfits that stun the senses, but then allows her to deliver a screechy performance that stuns the mind. The viewer is torn – I want to keep watching Arterton but I want that character out of the movie as early as possible. She’s magnetic and hateful.
Gyllenhaal is more innocuous. Dastan is meant to be played as a sort of scoundrel (I’m sure Han Solo and Princess Leia were discussed by the writers, credited as Boaz Yakin, Doug Miro, Carlo Bernard and story by video game creator Jordan Mechner), but he comes across as kind of a doofus. Gyllenhaal often seems dazed, and the very few stunt scenes where we can see his face we see that he has an expression of profound confusion upon it. There’s something endearing about that – the bumbling moron as epic action hero.
But it doesn’t really matter if Dastan bumbles because the entire film’s premise is based on time travel; in the Prince of Persia video game the ability to jump back in time a few seconds was a brilliant twist on standard gameplay, but in a movie it’s the best way to destroy all drama. Every time someone dies or something bad happens you simply expect the heroes to jump back in time and call a do-over; later, as the source of the dagger’s power is revealed – a big, Lost–like yellow glowing cavebound ‘source of all something or other’ – we learn that it’s possible to go back in time as far as you want. Guess how our hero wins the day and makes sure everybody is around for a sequel?
The supporting cast is reasonable. There are no Pirates-esque standouts, although Alfred Molina as a merchant obsessed with dodging taxes (he’s a Tea Bagger in the sand dunes), has lots of cartoony fun in his role. Kingsley is a generic villain; he’s given very little to do and scant time to be actively villainous. Most of his biggest villain moments come after Dastan has defeated the Hassassins, sort of dust ninjas who are the scariest guys in the world (except when confronted by a bunch of guys who run ostrich races in the desert. Then they get their asses handed to them), which really reduces the threat that Kingsley presents. If Dastan could defeat the dust ninja who is such a badass that a snake lives inside his pants, what hope does little old Sir Ben have against him?
The most surprising thing about Prince of Persia is that it’s some kind of Iraq War parable or something – the assault on the holy city at the beginning is based on false intel, and the promised weapon forges don’t exist. The fact that the filmmakers wanted to make some sort of statement about the Middle East today puts the cast’s preponderance of white actors front and center. They wanted to talk about how we deal with people from foreign lands, but they’d rather not use too many people from those actual foreign lands.
Newell directs the film in sleepwalk mode. Most of the fight scenes are unfollowable garbage, and for a movie based on a game that sort of invented parkour the amount of cool stuntwork is disappointing. This movie should have been full of crazy jumps and Dastan running up walls and making impossible escapes down towering minarets; we get a couple of moments of Gyllenhaal’s stunt double doing that stuff, but we get many more scenes of jumbled, uninteresting sword fights, often where people are being shot at with CGI arrows or darts. Most of the vistas seem to be CG, making you long for the simplicity of Middle Earth or Lawrence of Arabia‘s desert scenes (and I detected some distinct Lawrence rip-off cues in the score, by the way). Every time a long shot is real my heart soared, only to end up frowning as we next went to a big CGI city or a a CGI canyon or a real desert filled with running CGI men.
Speaking of CGI, is the time travel effect supposed to look shitty? When Dastan activates the dagger he turns into a sort of fiery, sandy being with Gyllenhaal’s face mapped on it; what it reminded me of most were the effects from Sommers’ The Mummy. It’s truly shoddy work, dark and unimaginative and ugly. This stuff should have been thrilling and exciting and like nothing we’ve seen before, not a return to sandman effects from the late 90s.
The most impressive achievement in Prince of Persia is how Newell and the writers managed to have so much happen and still make it boring. Everything is dusty and dull looking, the movie is so golden it feels like someone peed on the print. The action scenes are perfunctory and unengaging, and there are few thrills. I liked the ostrich race scene, and a couple of other moments here and there feel like they could almost have the energy of the first Pirates but otherwise this film is mostly dull and tired and doesn’t seem too interested in telling a decent story. Instead of a story we get scene after scene of the dagger changing hands; at the end when the Hassassins get it and Arterton freaks out you wonder why she’s so upset – the fucking thing has been in everybody else’s possession the entire movie, so there isn’t that much different now.
Perhaps Dastan should have used the powers of the Sands of Time to go back to the earliest days of this production and let everybody know to not bother; after all, nobody sets out to make a stunningly mediocre, completely generic movie. At least you hope nobody does, but then you watch Prince of Persia and wonder if anybody was actually trying.
5 out of 10
40 comments
"Prince of Persia could be the best video game movie ever made." – Devin Faraci, CHUD.com
totally agree with the above comment. get ready for the pull quote! Otherwise, a great (as usual) review, Dev!
I really hoped this would be good. I loved the PoP Sands of Time game more than I can express- (the next two slightly less so.) 2008's PoP game was excellent as well(who would have thought to spin a game out of Zoroastrianism folklore?) Will there ever be a truly great movie based on a videogame IP? Or does the medium need to mature more? It certainly was a long time coming for 1978's Superman film–before that comic book movies were shitty serials. Is that where videogame movies still are now, or is a legitimately good film possible in the near future?
Well fuck. I mean the entire point of doing this was to finally have a neat background to a full on parkour movie. I liked the stuff in District B-13, but the setting was dumpy. I figured if they were even going to bother doing this they'd get that much right. What a big fucking waste of time.
Mentioned this in the Box Office comments. The edit is really rough on this. Missing bits all over the place, like they didn't bother or have time to go back and smooth anything out. Molina and the Ostriches are great fun. The film's pulse gets a needed boost in those moments. The audience seemed to have a lot of good will towards the movie and wanted to enjoy it, but there were very few parts that satisfied that desire.
Do you like any movies these days, unless its some small indy film, or harry potter you seem to think its rubbish. Have we become such movie snobs now that every film we watch has to have life changing moments in it? Is Evil Dead any less of a film because it has shoddy effects? Of course not. And yes this film's budget is a billion times more then Evil Dead, but they are also trying to create more. Shoddy effects or not, I really don't think they should be part of a justification as to why the film is ho-hum.
I enjoyed the Mummy films, I enjoyed the Transformer films and I even enjoyed the forth Indiana Jones film. The fact you rated these the same (ish) I can be sure I will love this film.
Don't care much for the white-facing in this movie. Where in the cast line up does the first actor of Middle Eastern ethnicity appear?
Am I the only one that thinks Silent Hill is the best video game movie ever?
Yeah, it had the 15 minute plot dump near the end and most of the dialogue was awful. . . but it is was still fairly unique and managed to capture the feel of the games.
"when jake is in action, you can see the sweat of effort running down his glistening chest, forming a pool of love that ends at his belly button, waiting to be licked up by the sitting forward in their seat audience." As described by George Roush. LOL Gayest review ever.
@Comment 6 – just because you like a whole bunch of shitty movies, that shouldn't affect Devin's review.
This just sounds so shitty, and I've had my annual fill of sandy CG shitfests in the form of Clash of the Titans already. Pass.
@#6: Evil Dead has vitality and quite a startling level of craft on display. PoP while still enjoyable in parts has a real lack of craft on show and, I think, a director either too tired or too out of his element to give it his full passion. @#8: Yeah, that's the movie that's most successful at adapting the feeling and atmosphere of the game. If only they'd stuck closer to the established plot. I did like the introduction of the Centralia back story though. Hope SH2 stick close to the story of the game (maybe without the massive love letter at the end though and few dog and UFO drops).
@Comment #8. Yeah, Silent Hill was great. I too didn't care about the plot dump in the end, and the side adventures of Sean Bean were studio-mandated pointlessness, but I think the story was pretty good, the film looked amazing, the ending was neat and I liked the cast.
Sorry, Super Mario Bros is the best video game movie ever made.
Also, there's no whitewashing going on here. PoP isn't a Wizard of Earthsea. Don't get me wrong, I love the game but they were so clearly going for a look that is almost exaclty what Gyllenhaal has in the movie. Meaning generic white boy hero number one f-ing million. ALL the games, frankly. Look at his sprite in the old games, he's a friggin pink Persian.
"If Dastan could defeat the dust ninja who is such a badass that a snake lives inside his pants, what hope does little old Sir Ben have against him?"
LOL! I hope that character's name is Snake Pants.
@Comment 10, LOL. And number 6 he's got a point.
I wasn't gonna see this anyway but now thats been cemented. I don't understand why Jake Whatshisface is famous. Could anyone explain that to me? I liked Donnie Darko but he just happened to be in it and not affect my enjoyment of the movie.
@Comment #10: And just because you agree with Devin doesn't mean your opinion is in any way objective.
Either way, wasn't the game full of British voice actors? And wasn't the game completely historically inaccurate too? And didn't the game *SPOILER* have the same ending as the movie, i.e. use the Sands of Time to reverse everything?
That doesn't in any way mean that the movie was a masterpiece though. It was far from one. Although I don't remember having this much fun watching a movie on IMAX.
Ostrich racing? Did they manage to squeeze Joust into a subplot?
@ comment #10. Just because Devin hates all big summer movies doesn't mean you have to be a drone and follow him mindlessly.
These days I just about ignore reviewers and make my own mind up. It seems like people want to be led around by the nose…
#6 – "I even enjoyed the forth Indiana Jones film." You're a masochist.
comment 6 is just dumb. I liked the review it's just getting a little annoying how often devin bitches about white people or lost, and now he's managed to do both in the same article.
Can we put this movie on the list of movies with the shittiest CGI?
POP didnt invent parkour. i think that honor goes to ninja gaiden.
So, I'm guessing Devin didn't get a set visit to this. Is the 10/10 Scott Pilgrim review written yet? Christ…
Not sure how good Scott Pilgrim will be. Read the comics and found the characters to be much like the cool kids you'd find in a coffee house or vegan restaurant. In other words, annoying. Pulling for Edgar Wright though, he's funny
Hmmmmm. Best adaptation of a video game, yet it gets a 5 out of 10? I trust your opinion Dev, and I hope you are right; but then again, I always enjoy your reviews, even if I don't always agree after seeing it (which happens from time to time). I may go see this at the $1 theater, when it hits there, but other than that, I may wait until Netflix.
I'd hate to agree with 6 (Indy 4 made me die a little inside) but he's got a point…Devin's hates everything that's not off the wall (or didn't include him in a set visit). Were the Mummy moives dumb…yes. Was PoP dumb…yes. Were the Transformers movies dumb…thankee sai, understatement of the year…were they big and entertaining and a fun escape from reality for 2hrs…helll yeah. Devin's forgotten that movies are suppose to be entertainment.
comment #10 just made my day.
It's not that Devin hates "everything that's not off the wall" but that his reviews of this kind of movie are wildly inconsistent. 5/10 seems about right for this piece of shit, but then how does something like GI Joe, a movie every bit as idiotic and incoherent as PoP, get 8.5? Some blockbusters Devin seems to review with a ruthless critical eye (Iron Man 2, most recently) while others he approaches with the "it's great because it's dumb!" mindset.
How could something so vacant of intellect (Like GI Joe Rise of the Cobra) get an 8.5, yet this gets a 5? I would really like to know. Maybe I'm missing something here, but I saw more quality in about 15 minutes of PoP than I saw in the entirety of GI Joe. Oh and BTW, the best video game movie is still the first Mortal Kombat (now excuse me as I hide for cover by the comment posters)
Iraq war parable? Liberal perspective on Iraq war parable. Simplified summation of a simplified and completely wrong perspective on the Iraq war …parable.
Possibly one of the most disgusting movies I've ever seen. That's what it is.
32, then by all means, write an Iraq War parable from the George W. Bush/Sarah Palin perspective. I'm sure it'll be thoughtful and sophisticated.
I would put this movie in Saturday Afternoon Matinee territory.
Far better than Clash of the Titans, but not quite to Sinbad/Harryhausen level.
I'd say 'ho hum' is a pretty fair description of the Silent Hill film. That film really pisses me off, but it's not awful.
"Prince of Persia could be the best video game movie ever made. Which is faint praise, indeed, as pretty much every other video game movie has been rancid."
Resident Evil wasn't great, but it was far from rancid, and had great cinematography, no doubt due in part to Romero's direction. The sequels were pretty worthless, though.
No game adaptation has been as enjoyable as the completely insane Super Mario Bros. Resident Evil was rape and Romero had nothing do with it, shithead. I don't want to have anything to do with movies of games because the games should be able to stand on their own as narratives, otherwise CERTAIN PEOPLE won't consider them to be art.
you have no respect for you to take movie. you need to respect the persia.
I can see this film being about a 5 but the review suggests something like a 3. Kind of like how Cop Out looked like a 0, scored a 0 but got a review that made it sound like a 2 or 3. Good review, odd score.
There was a proper balance between CGI, live actions stunts, and real set designs which are all things I appreciated since the director could have totally dominated this film with CGI.
My issues with this movie stem mainly from the cheesy dialogue combined with the poor English accent of Gyllenhaal which irritated me like a dry handjob. I don’t understand why there is a need for the characters to speak in an English accent. The setting is in fucking Persia not England. No one in the Persian Empire spoke like that so I don’t understand why English is the go to accent. (In reality they didn’t speak English but that’s neither here nor there) For some reason that is the direction the writers and director decided to go in, so whatever. I would have had less of problem with this movie if Gyllenhaal spoke regularly. As I was watching his performance it was difficult not to focus on his overly accentuated tone. I don’t know why the director didn’t say to him after the first scene, “You know what? Fuck the accent. All the vocal lessons in the world couldn’t help you. Speak in your regular voice and let your acting stand out.” Kevin Costner saw no need for an English accent when he was in Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves. While it was slightly awkward that his character spoke differently than everyone else it worked and it allowed audiences to enjoy the film. As for the rest of the cast in the Prince of Persia, they were all from the United Kingdom so at least they weren’t a problem. However, the cheesy dialogue was. I shouldn’t really have expected anything different since this film is coming from Disney. Like a majority of Disney films everything was wholesome and finely tuned and lacked elements of rawness. I can at least say that the first two Pirates of Caribbean do not fall into that category. Those movies were done with style. I hated the third one.
The movie could have been better. Personally, I would have done things differently especially the ending. There are two more parts to the story so sequels are possible. If so, you should expect darker films, especially the second one, which will be filled with uncertainty, peril, and death. I hope they don’t fuck that up.
Overall: C-
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.