The Last Airbender is a bad movie. This seems to be empirically proven. The question the remains is just how bad is The Last Airbender? Judging by the reactions on my Twitter feed, it’s one of the most catastrophically bad movies ever made. These reactions make me feel weird, since I think it’s just run of the mill bad. Still, it’s telling that I could end up being one of the film’s biggest defenders by simply saying ‘It’s just regularly bad.’
Based on a cartoon show, The Last Airbender is set in a mythical world where certain people have the ability to control (called bending) one of the four elements – earth, water, air, fire – depending on their race. There is an Avatar born every generation who can control all four and who helps keep the peace in the world. 100 years before he disappeared, and the Fire Nation took the opportunity to wage a huge war that enslaved most of the other nations and totally wiped out the Airbenders. Then suddenly the Avatar is rediscovered, frozen in ice along with the dragon from Never Ending Story, but it turns out that he’s just a kid and he hasn’t mastered all the other forms of bending. So it all becomes a race as the Fire Nation tries to capture the Avatar while the Avatar and his friends trot around the globe doing stuff and getting training.
There’s some interesting world building going on in the film, but little else. Director M. Night Shyamalan seems to have continued his process from The Happening, in which he apparently intentionally makes every wrong choice. In The Last Airbender he has cast the film almost exclusively with terrible actors incapable of even delivering lines like “We have to go now” with any believability. Noah Ringer plays Aang, the young Avatar, and he’s generally miserable. I feel bad shitting on the performance of an actor so young, but since he’s the lead you would hope that he would have some kind of charisma if not actual acting chops. He has none.
But he’s not the worst actor in the piece. Dev Patel, from Slumdog Millionaire, plays the whiny exiled son of the Fire Nation king, and he’s pretty rotten, but at least in an energetic way. He seems to think he’s playing in 1980’s Flash Gordon (and maybe he’s right), and he’s hamming it up beyond belief. I kind of enjoyed that, which is much more than I can say for everyone else. Jackson Rathbone, playing an Eskimo (!), once again gives his usual lizard performance – huge staring eyes, pursed lips, head darting quickly to and fro. It’s hilarious. Nicola Peltz plays his sister (and I’m guessing Aang’s future love interest), Kitara, and she’s just about the worst actress I have ever seen in a major motion picture. Again, I feel bad railing on kid actors so much, but they are just so completely fucking terrible.
The adults don’t fare better. Cliff Curtis is brutally wasted as the Fire Nation king, while The Daily Show’s Aasif Mandvi bends minds with his poor casting as some other Fire Nation asshole. Mandvi delivers every line like he’s standing on the stage at a Brooklyn comedy club, playing to a crowd of jaded hipsters.
Some of the actors might have not been so humiliated if Shyamalan had given them a script of any value. He continues his The Happening trend of writing expositionary dialogue that sounds like no human would ever speak it aloud, but at least here he has the excuse of a movie not even set on Earth. Even still, most of the spoken dialogue is simply tedious, plodding exposition, with wooden actors just drooling it out. As with every other Shyamalan film The Last Airbender is stultifyingly serious, and that seriousness just makes everything kind of silly.
As terrible as all of that is, none of it felt like it was any worse than stillborn crap like The Seeker: The Dark Is Rising or Percy Jackson. It’s just plain bad fantasy movie-making, the kind that’s a whole lot of production design and little else. I will say that at least The Last Airbender is full of incident; there’s always something to look at, and there are plenty of action scenes. None of them are worth a damn, but at least they exist. Maybe it’s just that I saw the eventless The Twilight Saga: Eclipse the night before, but I appreciated that at the very least The Last Airbender had a touch of scope and motion.
All of that ends up being worthless because M. Night Shyamalan seems incapable of directing a movie. Many of his shots are listless, and without life. The film is filled with jagged, rotten edits. And there are a couple of baffling shots, including one long establishing shot of a field that seems to have nothing to do with the scene that comes to follow. There’s a lot of inept filmmaking on display, although I think that Night retains a good eye for composition – a number of shots in the movie will make delightful stills. Maybe he should have become a photographer.
I suspect that many of the people raging against The Last Airbender are reacting at least partially to the fact that this is a Shyamalan movie. I’ve believed this emperor to have no clothes ever since Unbreakable, a tedious movie that’s a lot like Airbender except with better actors – po-faced, grim, joyless and shoddily written. That’s Night’s general MO; The Last Airbender feels positively bouyant for an M. Night movie, but for a cartoon action adventure it’s a plod.
Fans of the cartoon and those who still harbored some belief that M Night Shyamalan had talent to offer will be left raging. The rest of us will sigh, forget it and then try to remember what the name of this movie is when five years from now we catch a scene while flipping through cable channels.
The Last Airbender is a non-movie.
4 out of 10
55 comments
'It's just regularly bad.' I'm hoping to see that quote on the back of the DVD =)
Aren't the four elements earth, air, water and fire?
The "cartoon" is fantastic! (IMO)
This movie is a travesty to the source material. I hope M. Knight NEVER makes another movie. I want someone to tell him "you'll never work in this town again." That'd be awesome.
But that's just me.
R
Unbreakable and Signs were great. After that, phhhptbt.
Another spot-on review.
So "bad cartoon" + "bad actors" + "bad filmmaker" = bad movie?? I never would have expected this.
Since Percy Jackson was actually quite damn good, and much better than the books, than I assume that means this movie must not be that terrible. Then again, he compared it to "The Seeker."
M Night is not a DP, therefore he should not become a photographer since he didn't compose the shot. He should just retire, period.
Its amazing how easily the lapdogs sway. The same people who were calling the pedestrian and extremely boring Sixth Sense an amazing movie and M.Night an amazing talent are the ones lining up to say what a hack he is now. The only thing America likes more than a winner is a loser they can gang up on.
Anyone that says this is based off a "Bad Cartoon" has obviously never watched it. Sucks that the movie is so terrible.
I just sincerely hope this disaster isn't going to ultimately put people off checking out the show, which is wonderful, funny, touching and exhilarating.
Avatar: The Last Airbender is actually a pretty good cartoon. Its as close to an American anime as we'll likely ever to get and it was a Nicktoon of all things.
Too bad aboot the movie it seems. The trailers made me kinda wanna go see it. Oh well.
Shockingly terrible. Production design was great. Everything else, well below average.
M. Night's problem is that he bought into his own hype way too easily and too early. He can be a good filmmaker, but he needs someone to keep him in check. Apparently that will never happen, since he was called out for his bullshit at Disney and proceeded to cry in the middle of the meeting and refused to ever work there again…
The cartoon is a reat cartoon. Period.
If only watching this unlocked 1000 achievement points.
That's too bad, the story itself had potential. So did M. Night once upon a time. Man has that guy fallen off. In the last article about Last Airbender I said people should be celebrating a new way to tell a story – in 3D. New in the sense that none of the other movies were willing to do it until Cameron came along and reinvigorated the format with Avatar. It was pretty lifeless before then, so we celebrate a DIFFERENT way to tell a story. Next time I'll be more specific for you morons who mistook here for the AICN Talkbacks.
The cartoon is really good as kid-fare goes. If I was an adolescent, it would probably be my favorite show. Plot, theme, and characters all have a great arc and the epic scope of it really should have made for three solid films. Unfortunately, the source material fell into the wrong hands.
How can it be a "non-movie" and yet, still get 4/10?
"…although I think that Night retains a good eye for composition – a number of shots in the movie will make delightful stills. Maybe he should have become a photographer."
You realise this film was shot by Andrew Lesnie, right? I know we're desperate to find *some* kind of talent in Shyamalan lately, but let's credit the cinematography to the Cinematographer…
Let's hear it for THE VILLAGE!!! Anyone? ANYONE?!?!?!
You DARE to insult Unbreakable?!?! Good. You're right.
Wow, so even when the idea/concept isn't his own he still manages to murder it. LOLZ at #9 and #17's little personal wars. "Sixth Sense Sucked!", "Avatar was game-changing!". Tell it to your tear-stained pillows crybabies.
THIS MOVIE WAS so BAD, AND I AM POSITIVE THAT EVEN THE ACTORS, PRODUCERS, and DIRECTOR KNEW/KNOW IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This was shockingly bad. Theaters should just show a few episodes of the original show, which is delightful. Never should have been converted to live action.
This might the most hype movie and was real bad like horrible
Comment #7—I think that maybe what he meant by stillborn crap was that the series was dead right out of the gate. "Percy Jackson" really didn't make a lot of money, at least compared to what it cost, and it's probably too expensive to bother with a follow-up. There have been all these films in the last decade since Potter and Rings that have claimed to be the next big fantasy franchise (Eragon, Seeker, Golden Compass, etc.) that seem more focused on convincing you that it's a big deal rather than actually getting a single movie out there that enough people give a damn about. The promise of there being more doesn't mean shit when what's already there doesn't interest people. They should probably concentrate more on just making one GOOD self-contained film and just see where it goes from there.
from DRUNKHULK's twitter: "DRUNK HULK JUST FIGURE OUT TWIST! M NIGHT SHYMALAN CAREER WAS DEAD WHOLE TIME!"
In the future please review shitty movies asap so I don't waste my money or time. This was the worst movie ever next to Game of Death and Blankman!
I see dead careers.
Terrible movie. Don't waste your life or money on it.
I find it amusing that people can be grouped according to which movie they believe Night lost it (for the sake of simplicity, we'll ignore the contraries who never thought he had it from day one). Devin obviously falls into the camp who believes Sixth Sense was his only worthwhile movie. Most, like myself, think Unbreakable and Signs were also great movies and things go downhill from there. Once in a while I meet someone who still clings to the notion that Night is great director and that movies like Lady in the Water and The Happening were mere stumbles and he'll get back to making great movies once again. I pity those people.
I predicted this. The cartoon, while retaining the ability to be *just* the right amount of serious, is usually very lighthearted and fun. Lots of kid-style jokes are cracked, some general "I'm confused about being a kid" growing up moments, along with the always-present theme of moral ambiguity, presented in a very kid-friendly way. But it was DEFINITELY not all dramaticly-lit fights, which was the only thing I ever saw in the trailers.
So, judging off that and Shyamalan's track record, plus the current trend of fantasy-killing in movies, I knew it was gonna be bad. I didn't know it would be THAT bad…
WIDE AWAKE was a painfully heavy-handed movie but after THE SIXTH SENSE you could view that first movie as an aberration (it had some good stuff, after all). I love UNBREAKABLE and SIGNS (though both are flawed) but when THE VILLAGE came out… that was announcement. "I have no talent and I don't know what I'm doing." I have since realized everything that came before was the aberration and everything after the rule: Shyamalan ripped off Rod Serling as best he could for a while but now the game is up, the curtain is drawn and you see the man behind the curtain: a chump. He will not rebound because he is not a great artist that lost his way. He is a hack that almost accidentally made a few good movies. I still like those good movies but let's not kid ourselves…
The whole situation with M. Night Shyamalan gets annoying when folks start to go further and further back to rail on the man and his movies. I am not going to go as far as to say that SIGNS belongs in the top echelon of filmmaking, but the script has a lot more going on than most. There is a lot of ambition there, with meticulous setup that unfortunately had a little to much "spin" for many viewers. I've made the argument numerous times that Shyamalan put together scripts (ok, at least in his earlier movies but definitely not now) that earned their endings. The conclusions weren't really twists that came from left field, like THE USUAL SUSPECTS or SEA OF LOVE. All the details were there from the beginning and it wasn't until the finale where everything came together in a new context.</br>
His screenwriting really started to take a dive with THE VILLAGE where all of the elements weren't really there from the beginning. We were smacked with some of the weakest structure in LADY IN THE WATER, a ridiculously convenient information delivery system existed with the those Asian neighbors. Then THE HAPPENING was just a half-assed first draft that somehow got picked up. Everything I read about THE LAST AIRBENDER seems to point to this continuing Shyamalan trend- horrible narrative structure, weak and unbelievable dialogue accompanied with his inability to direct actors. I was once one of the last defenders of Shyamalan. I think there is some brilliance there, but I am getting the feeling that his head is STILL deflating from his early career success. SOMEBODY has to get through to him that his career is on the line. My fear is that with two spectacular nosedives in a row, that career may already be over. If you were a studio, would you invest in one of his films EVEN WITH Bruce Willis attached?
Funny thing about Aasif Mandvi's character is that the same character was voiced by Jason Isaacs – yes, THAT Jason Isaacs – in the cartoon. This may be the first time in history that the actor portraying a character in a cartoon TV show was replaced by a much less famous actor for the big budget feature film film adaptation rather than the other way around.
M Night has the unique ability to suck the life out of any actor he puts in front of the camera. Half the time he could be filming cardboard cutouts and you wouldn't know the difference. Worst of all this seems to be his directing MO, so it's pretty safe to assume it's not going to ever change. Time to get him the hell out of Hollywood and let some other more talented directors have a chance.
what a bummer… The worst character of the film is the guy who played Sokka. He could not have been more of a polar opposite than in the cartoon. Sorry Night, i stuck up for you because of how great "Signs" was, but you have negated my allegiance with this file…we are now enemies and I challenge you to an Agni Kai
I liked the movie. Sure, some of the lines were laughable and that little kid that played the lead was the worst child actor since young Anakin, but the story that was presented kept my iinterest. I thought the girl that played Kitara was ok, she had a casual charm that maybe could have been better suited for another movie.
At first the B-movie dialouge and overall look bothered me, but I thought it got better as it went on. By the end of the film I was waiting for part 2.
The reviewers are correct, unfortunately. Not only did I enjoy "Sixth Sense" and "Unbreakable", but I'm a huge fan of the cartoon, and I've been looking forward to this movie for nearly a year… and I wanted to walk out. The ONLY reason I stayed was to see the action sequences. I thought Noah Ringer did an admirable job as Aang – not great, but enjoyable. Shaun Taub as the Uncle was the ONLY other believeable, even GOOD, acting job. I was SHOCKED at how bad the acting was, and how POORLY cast it was. I almost laughed out loud a handful of times! Then, there was the writing and directing. The book and script are just WRETCHED. The directing, outside of the action sequences (which I thought were beautiful, and the film's ONLY saving grace), was so amateurish as to be embarrassing. I was truly shocked that this movie was actually released.
It's still not too late for Shaymalan to save his name – by doing a Ledger. Yep, if he kills himself, there'll be nothing but moronic, false cries of "genius", "misunderstood artist", "gone too soon", etc. – i.e. precisely what he wants and believes.
This one always looked to me like one of those movies that if you enjoy anime, you might like it; if you don't, no chance. I'm not one who ever got into anime, so this one didn't really appeal to me, but if that's your thing, I say go for it. I have friends who dig anime and I'm betting they'll probably like this. On another topic, now I'm wondering how The Sixth Sense and Unbreakable would hold up under the scrutiny of repeated viewings after a decade or so has passed… I remember liking them both when I saw them back in the day, but now I'm curious to see if I'd still think they were good.
I didn't think this was a terrible movie. It's based off a Nicklodeon cartoon that I'd have never watched more than a few times on Hulu to get some background before I went to see the film. I'm sure kids will like the action and special effects, the story was mediocre but it's the same as the cartoon. Maybe people had higher expectations for this then I did so I wasn't disappointed when I saw it. If i was to give it a rating I'd say 5 out of 10…nothing great but still entertaining. Shamalayan still needs a blockbuster to get out of his bomb spree but at least this felt better than a uwe boll movie 🙂
@ Comment #7: I loved Percy Jackson and the Olympians as a series. It's great children's lit with a good sense of character and a pretty high dramatic tension. It might not be expertly written, but it's aiming to sound like the journal of the kid – so it's reasonable that it seems like a kid wrote it. It deals with the troubles of growing up, much like Buffy the Vampire Slayer did for the high school crowd, in a fantastical and clever way. The movie, however.. was a goddawful piece of garbage that was damn near unwatchable. They even had a great cast.. but no everyone seemed to leave their acting caps at home and phoned it in hardcore. The effects were slipshod and the cinematography was nonexistent. It couldn't even capture the essence of a single character.. That movie failed on every level.
I love, love, love the Avatar: The Last Airbender series, and I haven't seen this yet. I still will, though my hopes have been crushed with rage-induced fits of spoiling from my friends that have already seen it.. I'd have preferred to go in blind and make my own criticism.. but it was unavoidable. I got it from every angle. Ugh.
Anyway now I'll be going in knowing it's terrible and all I'll be able to think is.. well shit, how could it get worse? Oy.
the cartoon was actually pretty good. Kitara's brother has some great lines, like "Water Tribe, Represent.", or "Did I ever tell you how awesome it is you created Metal Bending?". In the show he has all kinds of charisma, and serves as good comedic relief.
It's not out over here yet but judging from this review and his other films is Shaymalan setting out to ruin his career? Why are his films specifically after unbreakable getting progressively worse?
You know, maybe I don't think it sucked as hard as everyone says because I went and saw Eclipse the next day.
This is a children's movie. Yes, the dialogue is clunky, etc. But it's rated PG, for goodness sakes. What did you expect?
Yup… Shitty movie;and if M. Night continue the Trilogy it would turn into a massive failure because the movie is missing out lots of characters like Bumi and Jet;and special events like Aang burning Katara while Fire Bending.
oh,and in the series Sosin Comet had only 6 months to arrive;But in the end of the movie, the fire lord tells Azula they have about 3 years … i mean WTF????????
This is an EPIC FAILURE
first is the casting…..the fire nations are cast with brown color when in fact the water ppl are supposed to be that in the cartoon..i miss the fat chubby old loveable uncle iro 🙁 ..next no emotions in acting from anyone…..and other than that the timing in the end of aang's avatar state is completely from that of the cartoon…….last but not least, the actors im probably thinking didnt even see the 1st cartoon episode…..the pronunciation for iro,aang,avatar are wrong…..follow the original plot…..how fucking stupid do you have to be if u cant even follow that…..and that kitara droning on and on with he narration….im seriously hoping that the next director does a better job for the sequel
It's really sad how people still think "children's film" is a good excuse for crap. Do you dislike children or something? Some of the most eduring literature of our time was originally aimed at kids. Small does not equal idiot.
when i saw the movie i wasnt aware that it was only book 1 water and so i was dissapointed. the actors didnt seem to know why they were there and you could tell. the movie wasn't good. Dont watch it. (The only reason i watched it was cause im a Jackson Rathbone fan but i just should of saw eclipse again)
I was disappointed 'cause my kid was disappointed. My daughter and I watched it and even she thought it was bad…simple things like NAMES for God's sake…Aing was pronounced "Ung"…annoying. As an adult I noted all of the criticisms above; but for "fans" it was even worse. He sucked out the CARTOON out like someone wanting to commit suicide from an exhaust pipe.
This movie was terrible. A waste of money for the ticket, popcorn, drink, ect. I thought it would be at least decent, but it was terrible. Terrible terrible.
I didn't make it through the first 20 minutes of this movie. I haven't walked out of a movie since the remake of Invasion of the Body Snatchers in the 70's. It doesn't even seem like Shamalamadingdong ever saw the bloody cartoon – which was the best TV I've seen in decades. The cartoon had great characters, writing, direction, vocal acting and art. It was a beautiful series. It was also a perfect story, with a beginning, middle and end. The fact that 2 main characters had mispronounced names supports the he-never-saw-the-original-series theory. There was no chemistry between any of the actors. It was flat-out boring. My 7 year old daughter, who went as Kitara for Halloween. supported my decision to leave the theatre. This movie sets the bar for bad movies lower than ever.
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.