CGI is an amazing tool that many filmmakers wield like a digital Mjolnir, creating worlds and creatures that take our breath away. Unfortunately through the years some have used it as a scythe, slashing our dreams and severing that muscle that connects our sexual pleasure organs to the muscle that tells our mind we’re really good at using our sexual pleasure organs. The result is oblivion.
So with that we bring you CHUD’s latest glorious list. The twenty worst instances of CGI in movie history. In no order. Well, except the order we decide to do them.
Brought to you by Renn Brown
THE OFFENDER: Blade (1998)
THE SCENE: The ultimate epic climax, and that’s the problem.
Blade is an interesting little film that acted as a harbinger of sorts for the coming wave of superhero films. Leading the pack meant that it managed to be greenlit as a comic book film and a definitively R-rated vampire flick with lots of swearing and violence and porn stars. This is a wonderful thing, but the film suffers from the same poorly thought-out mess of a 3rd act that would similarly plague a number of good (or even great) superhero films to follow. Blade starts off with a bang and pushes through with enough energy and charm to weather some of the rougher, cheaper, and sillier elements that crop up –the vampiric pseudo-science, Stephen Dorff, and “Use it to blow up some vampire heads.”
Blade was never destined to be a great film (though it spawned a hell of a sequel, which then spawned a shitpiece), but it could have remained a solid one, had it not been for an ending battle augmented by CGI so bad, that it destroyed the meager goodwill built up to that point.

Imbued with the supernatural might of La Magra, villain Deacon Frost becomes a being of pure blood (because a God-Vampire made flesh would, of course, be a menstruation monster) and immune to Blade’s arsenal of weaponry and Kung Fu. This is demonstrated with a few stunningly bad moments of unconvincing liquid effects that make you realize that no one really knew how to fucking end this film, or what a good climax would be.

What’s sad is that I can even tell that the effects artists tried to incorporate some old-school styled texture and feeling into the explosive moments (the fisting clip above not being one of them), but it’s just not enough.


…that’s never going to send anyone out of the theater thinking they just saw a real film.
IN SUMMATION: It is well documented on the DVD and in commentaries that the original ending of the film was much larger scale and involved an even BIGGER mass of formless blood that Blade would defeat, but disastrous test screenings and failed effects resulted in a scaled down approach that allowed for one more sword battle. While a look at the tests for the originally envisioned La Magra show they definitely chose the less shitty of two horribles, they frankly didn’t do much better here. Had they more carefully considered the evil plot at the heart of the film and devoted their full resources towards an original climax of reachable scale, then Blade might have been a true gem of the early comic book film renaissance. Instead we’re left with the terrible taste of the over-reflective pixels that pass for blood in this film.






23 comments
I wish this CHUD List would just go away.
This isn't nearly as bad as the sword fight between CG characters in Blade 2 – which I agree is the better movie, but that CG is really, really bad. Even Del Toro goes into a screaming fit on the commentary about how shitty the cg is in that scene.
This…. isn't all that bad by comparison.
My friends and I agree that these lists would be better with one change. Fluidity. They take forever to get new entrees to lists. I forgot this list was even still running because it's been at least 2 weeks since the last entry.
Ehhhh I've never thought that was too bad. It has it's own goofy charm. And after he cuts Dorff in half and he goes back together and he says 'What the fuck' or just mouths it or whatever, that part got me pumped. B-
While I agree the CGI aint great I still think that the original Blade was by far the best of the trilogy. When I think about it there was some pretty dodgy playstationery CGI in the sequel. Am glad you guys came back to finish this column and am looking forward to seeing Sound Of Thunder soon.
It's still better than X-Men.
Yeah, the efx are dated but Blade and Blade II are pretty good considering the source material. And Blade has one of my favorite lines: "Some motherfuckers keep trying to ice skate uphill."
@comment#1: fuck you!, this is an awesome CHUD list. The more of this, the less of "A Dumb a Day".
@comment#3: Amen, bro!
@verification captcha: EAT SHIT AND DIE ALREADY!!! Attempt #6, fucker!
Seriously? People on here are defending the CGI in Blade? It was terrible even then and it is unwatchable now.
The Blade movies were some of the first to use CGI-Big-Mouth=scary. For shame. (PS-i don't mind a verification system, but USE ONE THAT WORKS!)
I disagree. First of all, I think BLADE is definitely a great movie. It's an absolutely awesome character with the perfect balnce of grim tone, clever ideas and dry sense of humor. Most comic book movies before and sense would benefit by Blade coming in at some point and chopping the hero's head off with a sword. (especially Ghost Rider.)
Second, it doesn't matter that the CGI is not great, because the moment is great. Blade mouthing "what the fuck?" (or was it "motherfucker"?) in reaction to that is a hilarious payoff and one of many applause moments.
I also remember seeing it for the first time and worrying that Stephen Dorff was gonna turn into a CGI monster and derail a great movie. Luckily it didn't happen, they chose instead to have a fight scene with a few effects instead of a bunch of effects in place of a fight scene. I'd take this over the state of the art CGI climaxes in either of the IRON MANs.
Has no asked Sam Strange what he was thinking when he directed this?
Amen Vern. The spotty vfx moments are sold with character moments and some great one liners. I remember seeing this twice in packed theaters to rousing applause. While the sequel is awesome, it has some shit CG as well. Either way, the first Blade was far better than Hellboy.
Thank God this is back, looking forward to Day 18!!
I can't believe there are people out there who think Blade II is better than the original! Del Toro is obviously the better filmmaker of the two, but his sequel feels pretty small in comparison to Norrington's ambitious opening salvo. There's nothing in Blade II to match the impact of the blood sprinklers in the club scene. Blade is the first entry in the modern era of superhero movies, and deserves a little respect for changing our attitudes towards the sub-genre.
You know what is really bad? The deer in The Ring 2
Been reading this list since the first entry. Every time — every single time — all you guys do is say "the CG here isn't thaaaaaaat baaaad", as if you're strangers to hyperbole. The CG in every film they've mentioned has, thus far, been sincerely awful. Blade, as fun as the movie may have been, does not have CG that stands the test of time. Clearly that is what this list is making a point to mention.
I never noticed that Frost's shadow remains man-shaped, even as he bubbles up into a boomer.
I'm with comment #2. I know everybody loves swinging from Del Toro's nuts around (myself included), but that Stretch Armstrong ninja fight scene at the beginning was BEYOND awful cgi. Way worse than goofy Dorf, in my opinion.
I really wish Bloaty Dorf had waddled around a bit after Blade before exploding. "Ah gits yoo Bleeede!!! Ah gits yoooo!!!"
Yes. I agree completely. The climax for blade has always left a sour taste in my mouth after viewing. The effects sully what is an otherwise solid film and have always prevented it from elevating itself over time. Solid choice.
The question I have for all of you is: When did you see "Blade"? I saw it opening weekend many moons ago and it took me for a ride. I can look at it now and agree the f/x are dodgy, but back then they were badass. All of it was obvious CGI (along with the burning/exploding vampires), but it worked so well, you didn't care. I agree with Jer(#2) about Blade 2. That sequence Gumby sword fight is pretty iffy. And even though Del Toro is a better filmmaker, he didn't make a better movie due to a very weak and unnecessary love story. It puts both movies on equal ground.
Shoddy CGI–yes. But commenting that Blade II was way better? Oh HELL no. Yes, lets beat up vampires with WWE wrestling moves. Wesley suplexing a vamp made me want to walk out of the theatre right there. 3rd worst movie I've ever seen in the theatre. 1st being Batman and Robin, 2nd being Spaced Invaders.
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.