Can somebody make Kevin Smith watch The Other Guys? Because he needs to learn a thing or two, and a few months after his disastrously bad Cop Out, Will Ferrell and Adam McKay have arrived to teach him. This is how a cop comedy should be done – silly and absurd, and with a plot that isn’t just a lazy riff on a thousand well-worn cop tropes (although it does hit a couple of those).
Will Ferrell is a straight arrow desk jockey cop who wants no excitement at all. He’s happy to spend his days doing everybody else’s paperwork, while his partner, Mark Wahlberg, is stuck with him after accidentally shooting Derek Jeter at a Yankees game. Wahlberg seethes impotently as Dwayne Johnson and Samuel L. Jackson, playing supercops, get all the attention, cases and pussy.
But circumstances bring these two onto a legitimate case, and things gets serious pretty quickly. The police procedural aspect of The Other Guys isn’t the joy of the film, and thankfully the movie never makes too much of it. Rather it’s a spine from which the meat of the comedy hangs, and the spine itself is willing to make long and odd detours in order to find the best opportunities to be funny. The Other Guys isn’t as absurdist as Step Brothers, but it is very willing to get very wacky.
Ferrell changes up his persona here; dropping the overly confident schtick he’s done with McKay before, this time he’s a guy who is just trying to be as boring as possible, due to a hilariously sketchy past. There is no actor who plays clueless as well as Farrell, and here he mixes it with an overly willful squareness that creates comedy magic. He’s the straight man in the partnership, but he’s the source of just about every major laugh in the film.
Wahlberg is… lesser. My biggest complaint about the movie, and what held it back from real greatness for me (on first viewing. McKay’s movies tend to grow on repeat viewings) is that he’s so stiff and uncomfortable. He often makes the film feel like an SNL skit writ large, one of those sketches where the main cast is fluid and comfortable and has great timing while the guest is staring at cue cards the entire time. He doesn’t belong in the movie. My friend and fellow movie critic Todd Gilchrist insists that’s the entire point, and I’ll say that Todd has a compelling argument, but on a single viewing I found Wahlberg to often be a millstone around Farrell’s neck, sucking the energy out of scenes – thankfully Ferrell is more than up to the task of generating more and more energy as required.
Which isn’t to say that Wahlberg is terrible. He has some moments that really work, but it’s just so clear that he is woefully out of his league, especially when up against some of the supporting cast, like a delightfully weaselly Steve Coogan (whose bribery attempts with Broadway tickets led to one of my favorite absurdist gags) and a top of his form Michael Keaton as the partner’s frustrated boss. Keaton is gold in this movie, moving in and out and always leaving a huge swath of laughs in his wake.
Some folks have expressed surprise or disappointment that The Other Guys is a PG-13 film – do they realize that Anchorman was as well? McKay is a master at getting right to the edge of that rating and making you forget that you’re watching a movie that’s not a hardcore R. There’s not a single moment in The Other Guys that feels pulled back, no punches that feel pulled. In fact, I’d argue that when forced to work within a PG-13 restriction, McKay and his group really rise to the occasion, finding weird and crazy jokes rather than simply filthy ones. Anyone can drop the F bomb everywhere, but not everyone can come up with a running gag about homeless men having orgies in Will Ferrell’s car. In a PG-13 movie.
He also works in lots of subtle political content. This is a film about the economic collapse, believe it or not, and the end credits make that very explicit. McKay is interested in making you laugh, but he always wants to have something to say. I’d argue that all of his films so far have been like that, whether you noticed it or not, but this is the most in your face – and even then it’s fairly laid back about its politics. McKay is, in my opinion, the very best comedy director working today, and watching him grow and evolve with
The Other Guys is a pleasure.
It’s frustrating to review a movie like this on a lot of levels – the comedy is the comedy, and it has to be experienced to be understood. I can tell you that the laughs come almost constantly throughout the picture, but that doesn’t really sum up the way that McKay expertly engineers the pacing of the picture, knowing when to let you catch your breath before sending you into another fit of laughter. And it’s frustrating because McKay’s films truly need to be experienced multiple times – I liked Anchorman the first time I saw it, but it wasn’t until the fourth or fifth that I realized it was simply one of the best comedy movies ever made, taking a spot alongside Duck Soup, Young Frankenstein and Airplane!. So I’ll be heading to the theater again this weekend, plunking down my hard-earned gelt to sit and laugh through The Other Guys again. And Kevin Smith, if you’re reading this – come along, I’ll buy your ticket. But bring a notepad, because you’re getting schooled.
8.5 out of 10
23 comments
Haha that last line was fantastic. I watched Cop Out this weekend and was very underwhelmed so I'm pumped to see this. Nice review Devin!
Great stuff. You see the trailer, a few snippets and get a good vibe despite a well-groomed flinch response to "formula" comedy…and the fucker turns out to be good. No small miracle.
Nick didn't like it. I didn't see anything in the advertisements that didn't make me want to see it now and not wait for cable. And as I look at that poster for it, it screams "Chitlin And The Dude" from Tropic Thunder to me. I'm gonna pass.
Smith didn't write Cop Out and I thought that was obviously apparent. Don't blame him for that awful screenplay. His directing skills need work though.
Wahlberg in a comedy is scary enough to keep me out of the theater.
Fuck Will Ferrell and his unfunny schtick.
I'd be much more interested in this with Colin Farrell in Wahlberg's place.
Just saw the 40th Birthday Kevin Smith Q & A. He mentioned that Mark Wahlberg and Will Ferrell were initially on board for Cop Out. When that didn't work out, they went across the street and made a different cop movie. How different would Cop Out have been?
Devin is right on the money. Although, I think he's being a little hard on Mark Wahlberg. His ballet scene and interaction with Eva Longoria were priceless. There is also an amazing bullet-time/freeze frame montage that takes the technology to hilarious heights. It's like the Hangover Credit sequence only more surreal.
Out of all the trailers and clips I've seen for this, all the actors EXCEPT Will Ferrell have been funny. Steve Coogan was funny. Michael Keaton was funny. Sam Jackson & The Rock were funny. Even Mark Wahlberg was funny. Will Ferrell wasn't funny once. I stand firm. Will Ferrell is the worst comedy actor inexplicably working in movies today. He keeps ending up in movies with funny people all around him, but he is not one of them by far.
I didn't even realize this wasn't rated R – and I think Walberg was fantastic. He really played with the dangerous hot-head shtick from "The Departed". It's a shame that today's market doesn't allow him to play more Dirty Harry type roles.
I'm starting to think that I trust Devin's perceptive and review than Harry's. That's my word.
What a weird review. "See this movie twice for its brilliance to hit." Hmmm. I'm not against the sentiment, but man, SO many movies would be raped by Devin for this reason. Why does McKay get the free pass? Land of the Lost? Taladega Nights? Hmm…
"It's frustrating to review a movie like this on a lot of levels – the comedy is the comedy, and it has to be experienced to be understood." …yeah … When a reviewer has trouble explaining what make a movie so good, and doesn't even TRY, it's a big warning sign. Especially suspicious is the insistence that the audience has to see it for themselves to truly understand. Thanks for the useless say-nothing review, Devin. I guess the set visits and interviews paid off for the film-makers.
Devin's utter lack of appreciation for Wahlberg's grounding of Ferrel's retarded wacky-for-wacky's-sake comedy proves one thing … Devin is a "hipster", which is why he rails so much agains those who denigrate "hipsters". What makes him a "hipster" in this instance? His uncritical appreciation of comedy so bizarre, disconnected, and random that the "joke" is that it's not really funny, or makes any sense, but that it is NOT funny, and it's funny that people are left staring wondering what's funny about it. That leaves a few "elite" few like Devin congratulating themselves on their sophistication because they are above the normal slob's expectation of something really funny. The joke's on them, you see. Ironic appreciation of things that the hipsters don't really appreciate themselves is the hallmark of Hipsterism. It's hideous. Hope this trend of comedy movies ends soon. As far as real comedy goes, they are on the level that was mocked in "Idiocracy", with "Ass – The Movie". "Homeless men having an orgy in a Prius! HAHAHAHA"
Wahlberg's comedic acting chops are legendary. Did none of you see "The Happening?"
Your challenge to Kevin Smith seems to me a little petty and also ignorant of the fact that there was a screenwriter involved in making Cop Out suck. Sure, directors have some measure of responsibility, especially for signing on to direct a steaming pile of shit, but for fuck's sake, enough with giving directors god-like powers and also all of the credit and blame.
#13 Land of the Lost was by Brad Silberling, I believe he did City of Angels and Lemony Snickett.
As for McKay, I think he has gotten progressively better with each flick he's done, Will Farrell is suspect, when he's on he's on and when he's not it's not pretty. I might have to check this out when I'm free.
**spoilers ahead**
Devin — I generally trust your reviews, but I just can't agree with this one. The first twenty minutes or so of the movie were funny (the over-the-top car chase, Will Ferrell describing the tuna v. lion animal war) but I thought most of the gags after that fell pretty flat — and some were just exruciating (Eva Mendes's mother shuttling back and forth between her and Farrell with explicit descriptions of what they wanted to do to each other — not funny, just awkward). I thought this was more in Blades of Glory territory.
Yeah, I'm not buying this review. In my opinion, Will Ferrell has his moments but in the end, will always be an idiot. This movie seems to have gotten basically a free pass based on some preconcieved opinions.
Huckabees = great comedic Wahlberg.
I just came back from seeing this flick and thought it was mckays best (with stepbrothers a fairly close second). And i dont get all of the Ferrell hate, yeah the guy has made quite a few shit movies, but like someone else said, when he's on he is fucking on. He can be a hilarious guy! And it was nice to see him not playing a cocky dick for once. Wahlberg was good too IMO. Keaton was also great….semi reminded me of his Jackie Brown character which was great!
Ugh. I didn't laugh once during this movie. Comedy is subjective, but McKay has let me down four times now with his lowbrow shenanigans. Yes, even the sacred cow of ANCHORMAN is not that funny to me. Granted, much funnier than this tired buddy cop crap, but that's not saying much.
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.