
The
Film: The Expendable (2010)
The Principals: Director: Sylvester Stallone. Sylvester Stallone, Dolph Lundgren, Jet Li, Jason Statham, Terry Crews, Eric Roberts, Steve Austin, Some MMA Guy, Your Baffling Nostalgia
The Premise: Get a bunch of hasbeens together on a poster and sell lots of tickets.
Is It Good: No. It’s not terrible, and it has a handful of moments, but mostly The Expendables is tedious and uninteresting. One of the biggest problems with the film is that Sylvester Stallone’s script is dismal, filled with boring characters spouting woefully witless lines. He also never figured out the point of having all of these B list actors in the movie; the characters are not delineated in any meaningful way, and in fact nobody but Sly and Statham get anything to really do. In the final assault on the bad guy’s palace the Expendables are more like The Interchangeables – anybody could do anybody else’s job. And there’s no chemistry – it’s impossible to watch the movie without realizing that Jet Li seems to actively despise everybody else on set.
And then there’s Sly’s weird belief that audiences will care about the love lives of these grimy muscleheads. It’s stultifying to listen to Sly and Statham talk about their heartbreaks, and the only reason why a lengthy and moronic speech by Mickey Rourke is palatable is because the actor is so batshit that he makes it interesting.
Is It Worth A Look: No. The action is mostly poor, and the actors that you would be interested in seeing are sidelined almost the entire film. The Expendables was shot for a PG-13 and hastily bloodied up, meaning that every now and again someone gets shot or stabbed so hard they become a toon and are disassembled via shoddy, cheap animation.
What’s shocking, though, is that the film really falls flat with the actors. The whole purpose of the movie is to get these guys together, but there’s just about zero chemistry from any of them. Most of the actors display all of the charisma and screen presence of an oily rag. None are as bad as Randy Couture, an MMA ding dong who spends the whole film looking baffled and constipated. It’s hard to imagine anyone will deliver a flatter, less interesting performance in any motion picture this year. And yes, I’m including the shit your kids shoot in the back yard. Couture can’t even stand around convincingly. Also, his name sounds like a gay porn star.
Random Anecdotes: Sly falls in love with the least attractive leading lady I have seen in years. Everybody in this movie looks like they use engine grease as moisturizer. You haven’t lived until you’ve seen a movie try to draw pathos from the fact that barely human Mickey Rourke can’t find happiness with a mostly silicone slut whose name he doesn’t know. Sylvester Stallone had his neck broken on the film, but that happened too late to explain why this script is so bad.
Cinematic Soulmates: Home movies of steroid-addled weightlifters, every Dolph Lundgren film that was not suitable for a discerning audience.





28 comments
Well, this certainly comes off as an I'm-so-butthurt-this-outperformed-Pilgrim rant. To each his own.
Sounds like someone is still a bit bummed that SPVTW has gotten soundly spanked by this movie. Between your carping and McWeeney's pleading for twilight fans to go see the hipster doofus flop of the year, I think the definition of the phrase "bitter fanboy" has been revised.
Heheh. God Bless.
This article reeks of a writer with one foot out the door. Oh wait…
Wonderful. This should be your last article ever posted on CHUD – it''s such a perfect farewell in so many ways.
why is this the movie of the day? shouldn't the movie of the day be something interesting or a forgotten gem like "California Split" or "In a year in 13 moons" or what about motherfucking I dont know fuckin Barry Lyndon. I do enjoy the fact that you do not like the movie of the day. so i guess that's funny and it wasted 10 minutes of the work day and that's all I really need. keep up the good work.
(standing ovation)
Credit where due: you were right all along about this POS being a POS.
Man..I am not sure how you set your sights so high. I saw this movie with a couple guy buddies and we had a blast. No plot, no problem! Crap dialogue? No problem. Loud explosions, huge gun fights, over the top violence, and a gun that splatters people like something out of F.E.A.R. just make the whole thing cheap bloody fun. I won't say it's cinematic splendor, but to equate it to trash seems unfair. Considering you guys have taken to reviewing stuff that was direct to dvd and so goddaweful it should be banned, placing this movie in with those seems inaccurate as there is some great fun in there.
Wow! What a blast from the past.
I disagree strongly and I don't pound protein shakes nor do I do chest bumps with dudes at the gym
so why is this the movie of the day?
Can someone get this fat fucker to leave already. He is a giant vagina and has been a blight on this site for too long. GOOD FUCKING BYE DEVIN NOW LEAVE!
Hm. I really thought MOVIE OF THE DAY was about movies the writer liked.. guess I was wrong : /
See, people keep telling me it's a blast from the past, it's just like those great 80's movies. It's not. At all. Has anybody here seen Predator? Remember how much we liked those guys, how the characters and the chemistry really made you feel for them and want to see them live? Ok, now think about the Expendables. Can you remember any of the characters names other than Yang and Christmas? Did you at any point give a shit about anything happening on screen? Yeah, Sly made an homage to 80's action movies. Problem is that it's an homage to shitty direct to video 80's action movies.
And I'm no hipster, but Scott Pilgrim was infinitely more entertaining than this.
Yup. This review sums up my feelings about this flick entirely. Biggest letdown of the year. The movies it so desperately wants to be a throwback to – Rambo, Commando, etc. – are all SO much better than this humongous borefest. Those movies had a lot of similar problems, but they were FUN and they had GOOD ACTION. This had neither.
The Expendables was a pretty bad movie……BAD ASS, that is! It was also pretty bad. Cheesey, 80's style action flick complete with stupid plot & bad acting; why would anyone expect more? I mean, the cast lineup includes "Stone Cold" Steve Austin, his boyfriend Randy Couture, Dolph Lundgren, and Sylvester Stallone. Not exactly an Oscar-worthy cast.
Go cry into your Micheal Cera pillow Devin. The market has spoken and it said it wanted nothing to do with a movie that looked like a 80's video game crossed with a sack of crap. Expendables was exactly what it was intended to be, simple summer entertainment, nothing more. Except the fact that your precious Scott Pilgrim failed with film goers and move on. Your sorry, pretentious ass can't leave this site fast enough.
I wish, as a big Stallone fan that I could get in a huff about his but I can't argue too much really. The only thing I can really say that I would have forgiven all if only the action that there was had been shot correctly and not edited to fuck. A real shame.
I walked into a restaurant that was advertising a sugary dessert and I got a sugary dessert and some assholes here are bitching it's not filet mignon.
What Devin, where you disappointed when Dolph blew the shizzit out of the pirate at the beginning, super neat tokens didn't pop outta his ass? Come on, movie was so much better than you gave it credit for…sinner
So, this was moronic crap, but GI Joe was good?
I saw Joe based on your recommendation. That was a far worse film.
I also thought Movie of the Day was for older films, not the #1 movie in the country.
Devin, I beg you. When my movie finally gets released, please hate it with a passion.
Sorry big D, but everything you have ever championed have failed and died a horrible death while everything you have ragged upon have won handsomely!
Shit, I think even Saint Nick will be paying you extra just to hate his projects.
Damn dude, if you didn't have bad luck, you would'nt have any.
This movie was almost literally Punisher: War Zone, a movie Devin raved about, with 5 punishers. Except this movie had less annoying villains and Jason Statham. So, in essence I'm really confused about this review.
Well, I at least agree that the movie should be better. I enjoyed it for what it was, and think you're insane to dis Rourke's brilliant performance, but this cast and premise definitely deserved better writing and clearer action photography and editing.
Still, I think you're especially off-base about Randy Couture. He may be better at punching the shit out of people than performing soliloquies, but he has a natural charisma and I think will be awesome if he gets a chance to star in some movies. Check out the Mamet-scripted episode of The Unit that he guest-starred on, he's much more impressive in that.
"the least attractive leading lady I have seen in years." Alice Braga?
Totally agree with Devin, this film was a a colossal missed opportunity. It should have been one of the greatest action movies ever, but it's not even close to being the best one this year (and it's rather hard to choose one, so middling 2010 has been, but even Salt has better action sequences than this). I love 80's action movies, I was in the right mindset when I sat down to watch this – stoned, with a buddy for company – and it still stank. A complete waste.
I haven't seen it yet, but I will. But will say that because you have a lot of action stars in one movie won't make it great.
I made that mistake two times before:
1. I remember when the LA Lakers had Kobe, Shaquile, Karl Malone and Gary Payton all on one team. The Didn't make it past the first round.
2. Harlem Nights. Some of the best african american comedians that ever existed ( Redd Foxx, Eddie Murphy, Richard Pryor and more ). Big let down in laughs. Was way to serious.
Just because it has a lot of stars won't make it good.
But you better believe i'm going to see it!!!!
I went into the movie with very low expectations and I was disappointed. But then I realized something about 4 minutes in when Dolph yelled "Warning Shot!"…this is the funniest movie of the summer. Leagues funnier than the shitshow Dinner for Schmucks, and the first 20 minutues aside much funnier than the Other Guys.
Hysterical film. Terry Crews saying "remember this at X-mas" while erasing Spanish people with a street sweeper while viewing this from the end of an alley..
This should have been made by Tommy Wisseau, it would have been much better.
And least attractive lady in years? Who? Stone cold Steve Austin?
Totally agree with Devin. Very boring movie with only a few good moments. Not even close to the entertainment value of his recent Rambo.
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.