The multi-year water treading between MGM and Darren Aronofsky on the proposed reboot of Robocop generated a lot conspiracy theory about what was holding things up, and what ultimately went wrong. Some figured it was a disagreement between the studio and the filmmaker on budget vs. rating. Another widely spread rumor was that Aronofsky was firmly set against shooting the film in 3D, which MGM found unacceptable. Which of these things are true?
None really. MGM was (and is) just broke.
This confirmation of what Devin pretty much reported over a year ago, comes from an MTV interview that asked Aronofsky about the split, and he flatly denied that it was about 3D or anything artistic at all. Scheduling was the ultimate deal-breaker, as Black Swan was ready to start and Natlaie Portman was free to make it. With MGM still miring in debt and financial restructuring, it “just became an easy decision.” He has a “we’ll see” outlook on any future movement on the project.
Aronofsky goes on to clarify his attitude towards 3D which, like most interesting filmmakers, is one of complete openness and excitement at the prospect of new storytelling tools. His reticence towards the format in earlier stages of Robocop was expressed before he had seen Avatar, and likely before MGM would have even thought about making 3D a priority.
“With the right project, I’m totally into 3-D… Scorsese’s working in 3-D. I am very curious what that’s going to be. Like everyone, I thought Avatar was an incredible experience. I’m also interested in what someone like John Waters would do in 3-D. That’s when it starts to become interesting, when you start to see it used in very interesting, different ways. There is a backlash at this point, and I think that’s just because it’s been overexposed, but that’s just because people are rushing to bank in on it. There’s no doubt that interesting things are going to be done in 3-D.”
Whether the project will involve robotic law enforcement or not, and regardless of how many dimensions it will be presented, I have no doubt Aronofsky will be playing in the big budget sandbox eventually. I can only hope it’s sooner rather than later, if that’s where he’d like to end up. Even if it’s never meant to be, I’ll take as many small movies as Aronofsky cares to make.





6 comments
The idea of Aronofsky behind the camera (3D or not) on this flick was the ONLY thing that had me remotely excited about a remake of one of my favorite movies of all time. I'm glad this project is dead but VERY excited that he is now under consideration for Wolverine II…after the mess that was the first one I really think Aronofsky could bring some credibility and style to what is already one of the finest Wolverine stories ever told. I'm sure a little bit of the "Japan Saga" will change in the course of it getting into theaters but the basic skeleton of the story has more than enough action and drama to make us all forget how shitty the first movie was and remind us why Logan is the best at what he does.
"Aronofsky goes on to clarify his attitude towards 3D which, like most interesting filmmakers, is one of complete openness and excitement at the prospect of new storytelling tools."……….Thank you. Well put. And seeing as how CHUD more than any other website seems to bring out the passionately furious Avatar haters, how do you guys feel to hear that Aronofsky thought it was an 'incredible experience'? I bet you backpedal a little now.
the death of any remake is good news..
I for one am glad that this Robo project will hopefully never see the light of day,Robocop just stands alone with great films like bladerunner and Alien as another peek into the future, after the first Robo film they never we're able to recapture what made Robocop great and just shoveled more and more crap onto the grave of a great potential franchise.
John Waters in 3D? The mind boggles ( and shudders a bit)
Hopefully it will still happen. Robocop and Aronofsky would be super bad ass.
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.