If you were looking for an idea what the MPAA was thinking when they rated Blue Valentine, the trailer holds no answers. The recently released trailer for the film contains no hint of the apparently emotionally raw and uncomfortably grim sex scene that earned the film a baffling NC-17 rating last week. You can check out the trailer below, though you’ll only find a warm introduction to the relationship between Ryan Gosling and Michelle Williams, with vaguely sad faces and tears the only indicators that this is the story of a decaying marriage.
The film, directed by Derek Cianfrance, is a Weinstein Company Sundance acquisition and has received positive reviews from all of its festival appearances. Set to be released on the last day of the year, the film now faces the challenge of a ratings appeal, cutting the film, or trying to push through a successful unrelated release. For a film that is looking to score Oscar attention for its actors, that latter option is a tough one.
The MPAA excels at John Proctoring films into early graves or more-niche-than-necessary releases, and this is no different. The consensus seems to be that the scene is more emotionally uncomfortable than explicit, and responses from many festival-viewers maintain that there isn’t any notable nudity or any violence at all. I’m interested in seeing the film for myself and finding out if there is some dangerous, threatening piece of this film that would merit such a crippling rating, though I think I’m just going to discovery that more MPAA dick-swinging and hyper-conservatism is the culprit.
These ratings were created with the noble idea of giving parents a resource with which to properly decide what their kids can and can not see. We live in a time though, when parents have nearly infinite resources to find out the most minute details about any piece of media their kid might be exposed to, and an era where DVD distribution has seen studios circumventing their own little pet council to make a few extra bucks on UNRATED discs. The over-simplified ratings system has long been rendered useless- it holds literally zero value for filmmakers or for parents, and is simply an outdated ghost of a piss-ant attempt at a Hollywood studio Illuminati.
The theater chains are certainly showing no balls in the small horror-based attempts at ignoring the MPAA, and I have no hope that the rating system will cease entirelyanytime soon, but at least the unstoppable tide of modern digital distribution is making them an increasingly tiny voice pissing into an increasingly loud wind.





5 comments
Wouldn't an 'emotionally intense sex scene' be less obscene by the standards of the pornography trials? I thought the idea was that porn had no artistic merit and meant to sexually arouse the viewer (or, commercials as Bill Hicks put it). It seems like an emotionally intense sex scene that gives the viewer no desire to have sex would then be art… An NC-17 rating wouldn't seem appropriate then (not that it ever really does). Maybe they just hate Grizzly Bear or Tom Waits?
I am so sick of the pitching online about Hatchet 2 being pulled. It made $70,000 and the average attendance was 12 people per showing. I am not a big fan of mega corporations but this one is a no brainer. Also, the movie getting pulled probably sold a few extra thousand dvd's down the line and the director and producers know it and that is why they are like, "we don't know what happened? The MPAA must by out to get us."
Good one, #1. They get an NC-17 for apparently making good art. I can't wait until they make that "Hard R" rating between the R and NC-17, which will ultimately solve nothing.
This looks very indie and very good (not that the two always equate…). But NC17? The MPAA is fucking ridiculous and needs to change or grow the fuck up. Oh, and i'm not gay, but I think i have a man crush on gosling.
Thanks for good stuff
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.