Ghostbusters 3 has been scheduled to start so many times it’s nearly a joke in and of itself. As far back as the mid-90’s Akyroyd had a script about a younger group of busters teaming up with the old crew to eradicate Manhattan’s spectral population, but it obviously never made it into production (and a lot had to do with Bill Murray’s reluctance at doing sequels).
Yesterday Production Weekly tweeted that Sony Pictures is “planning to put Ivan Reitman’s Ghostbusters 3 into production in May 2011″.
This is great news for fans of the franchise, but I’d suggest to freak out with caution: the news states “planning”, so that gives Sony a huge loophole if they get cold feet and pull the plug at the last minute. It wouldn’t be a surprising move, especially if Murray decides he wants nothing to do with this. Akyroyd, who wrote the script with the help of Gene Stupnitsky and Lee Eisenberg (both from the American version of The Office), says Murray would be crazy not to participate, as Gene and Lee wrote him “the comic role of a lifetime”.
With May right around the corner expect official word regarding this to start appearing any minute now.





8 comments
Akyroyd?
Aykroyd!
"[T]he comic role of a lifetime" written by the two guys who wrote YEAR ONE would not make me, if I was Bill Murray, jump into the fire…
I say if Murray doesn't want to do it, cast the part with CG John Belushi. He was supposed to play Venkman to begin with, and it would be nice to see him play the role of a lifetime after having been originally prevented by a premature deathtime.
I know that you are correct about Belushi originally slated to play Peter V, but your CG fix is such a stupid idea I want to kick you in the face. Sorry for my statement of hatred. Have a wonderful day.
It'd be great to be sitting in the theatre one day, only to see a teaser trailer for a new Ghostbusters movie. It'll get made – it's an instant hit. Who wouldn't want to see it? Let's hope the cameras roll, Murray comes back – he might, considering his public appearances recently – and Reitman knocks it out of the park. It can't be any worse than 2.
Wait, wait, wait, Bill Murray's reluctant to do another Ghostbusters sequel, but he did Garfield: A Tale of Two Kitties, no problem? Perfect logic.
The gal from that pic up there, she'll be one of these new Ghostbusters… right?
I know this movie stands maybe a 2% chance of turning out well, but I still want it so very badly. It's like INDIANA JONES V or a new STAR WARS trilogy or the new MAD MAX movies. I know these are all terrible ideas, but like so many other people I guess I just can't get over my childhood.
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.