The Hunger Games is a mess.
While not without its charms Gary (Pleasantville) Ross’s film ultimately comes off as an imposter, coasting on its brand and a hearty dose of classic science fiction and fantasy staples on a path that somehow manages to make two and a half hours of screen time seem rushed. It’s higher quality fare than many other recent tentpole franchise offerings thanks to the class struggles, Dystopian outlook, and the brutality of the concept but there’s nothing here than elevates the film from being more than a smash-up of The Handmaid’s Tale, Logan’s Run, and The Running Man skewed to the teen marketplace. Not that there’s anything inherently wrong with that. The Hunger Games works as a modestly effective gateway genre film. There’s nothing new here but if there’s any justice it’ll be a conduit into a wide variety of better, previous works. It’s Teen Fiction made for a big budget for the big screen so it’s unfair to expect the same level of shading present in adult fare, but it’s still not all that good. Teen books or not, when you’re at the big boy’s table you’d better be prepared to throw down. It simply doesn’t. There’s no emotional payoff, a few too many shortcuts, and a few very glaring stylistic decisions that prohibit the film from earning its place in the pantheon, massive guaranteed box office number notwithstanding.
Jennifer (Winter’s Bone) Lawrence is Katniss, a headstrong young woman who lives in the rundown District 12 in the shattered and heavily divided autocracy of Panem long after the modern day. The North America we know is gone and one ruler (played here by a sleepwalking Donald Sutherland) stands tall with an iron fist. Of the twelve remaining districts it is the most impoverished and the best life Katniss can wish for is hardly a life at all. What she has is cunning and skill in the wild. She’s good with a bow, doesn’t adhere to rules, and has dreams outside the rigid framework her nation has allowed her. Those dreams involve protecting her family and possibly finding love with the handsome Gale (Liam Hemsworth, here reduced to longing stares and minimal dialogue).
The Hunger Games are a yearly occurrence in Panem where one boy and one girl are chosen from each district in a “Reaping”. Those children and young adults are trained and then sent into the wild to slay each other. This is an alternative to war and somehow it works, the first of many leaps of logic and faith in this story. When her little sister’s name is chosen, Katniss volunteers in her place and she and after an acquaintance of hers named named Peeta (Josh Hutcherson) is chosen they are whisked away to begin their training. This portion of the movie is interesting because there’s so much to set up, but in trying to sell the dirty and bleak world of District 12 Ross invests a loose and handheld approach to his filmmaking and oftentimes the camera work betrays the storytelling. Typically in films like this the director is invisible but there are many moments where the stylistic decisions really strain the flow of what’s happening onscreen. Worse yet, once the story moves to the city with its bright colors and wacky fashion and hairstyles the shift in style is jarring. Suddenly the camerawork is crisp and the shot composition more epic. The material alone is enough to convey the divide between the rich and the poor but when the first fifteen minutes of a film is trying to channel Paul Greengrass there’s a bit of a narrative shock when it starts to riff on a Fifth Element era Luc Besson.
The best part of the film takes place in the capital. Partially because the most world building occurs there with the architecture, comically ridiculous socialites, and twists on the familiar but also because this is where the bulk of the real actors are present. Stanley Tucci, Toby Jones, Sutherland, Elizabeth Banks, Woody Harrelson, and even Wes Bentley allow for a little of the dramatic burden be lifted from the younger actors. It lends a little weight to the proceedings, though it’s hard not to dismiss a lot of the exaggerated costuming and makeup. Tucci in particular gets a few laughs just due to his ridiculous purple hairstyle. This is a heightened look at our culture. Through a prism of a very rigid and dangerous government this rabid devotion to what is essentially a reality TV event showcases an extreme look at where we may be heading. It’s been done many times and a lot better but when a film geared towards a younger audience is willing to showcase the dangerous voyeuristic tendencies humans have coupled with their love of the visceral and sensational in a negative light it’s hard not to feel a little invested. The Hunger Games biggest asset is its anti-establishment bent and the way it spins our worst examples of human manipulation ranging from Roman times through Nazi Germany and right on to today. It’s often heavy handed and without that delightful Verhoevenian wit it’s mostly superficial, but it still is considerably more effective as a theme than say brooding vampires or even brooding wizards.
While in the Capital City, The Hunger Games works. The dynamic between Katniss, Peeta, and Woody Harrelson’s drunken instructor Haymitch [these names are so silly it’s hard to take the flick seriously] is charming and contains a nice array of fun moments. Training sequences are easy ways to build character, have a few laughs, and set up the opposition and this film does a solid job of pulling it off.
Suzanne Collins’ books have the luxury of building in backstory that even a two and a half hour movie is incapable of. A lot of how much an individual enjoys this film depends on how much of this world they’re willing to buy. Accepting that a populace is this willing to be held in sway by such a ludicrous peace solution. Believing that kids killing kids for televised entertainment would be even possible.
When the film gets to the actual combat it loses the fun of showcasing the class system at work and becomes a product which strains the logic of why the books are such a sensation. Particularly with the Katniss character. Here is the protagonist of the entire trilogy, a very effective hunter and portrayed excellently by the always reliable Lawrence. Katniss has such a precise moral code and is so willing to protect those she loves it’s annoying to see the character constantly being kept from being an iconic heroine. Over the film’s last hour the story is completely focused on these 24 young people hiding, running, killing each other, and forming absolutely ridiculous alliances. It’s where The Hunger Games could have elevated itself into a legitimate tentpole film but instead showcases its young adult origins in vivid detail. Katniss almost never is given a chance to do anything good as characters come in from out of nowhere to give her the key to whatever needs to get her out of the pickle she’s in, balloons with gifts from the real world deliver an ingredient she needs, or worst yet a character saves her skin just before she’s killed or takes the fatal shot themselves. It’s lazy. Worse yet, Katniss is a legitimately interesting female leading character so having her luck out throughout the story makes the whole house of cards tumble.
And that is before dog creatures that have never been introduced in the film are suddenly created and manifest in the combat zone. Not only are they created but they are somehow not three-dimensional holograms but actual monsters who rip and shred and can kill the participants. I’d guess they’re explained in the book but when a film is reaching its climax and creatures that make no sense suddenly appear and once again provide handy to our leading character, it’s a problem. A big problem.
The Hunger Games is a mess, which is a shame because there are plenty of effective elements to it. It’s just not tied tightly enough for the finished product to work as a franchise starter or even a night at the movies and adult viewer can watch and feel like they got their money’s worth. A few nice performances and fun twists on our culture are great but the end result is a thoroughly convoluted scattershot bit of business.
The kids’ll love it though.
Rating: 




Out of a Possible 5 Stars





10 comments
This review is exactly how I feel about Harry Potter, especially the aspect of the “hero” who has every solution handed to him/her. It makes me wonder if this is where this generation of teenagers’ sense of entitlement comes from – all of their heroes have all of their problems solved for them.
Yeah, I’m also not a Potter fan.
Nick, I’m lazy and don’t want to create a thread on the forums that you hopefully see so here. Good article on Grantland about Celebrating Chipper you’d probably like.
http://www.grantland.com/blog/the-triangle/post/_/id/21789/celebrating-chipper
After reading the review though I did want to comment on this; “This is an alternative to war and somehow it works, the first of many leaps of logic and faith in this story.” Unless they changed this from the movie and book, the actual “Hunger Games” are a show of strength and punishment for defying the Capital 75 years ago. Capitol is saying “we can make you give up your children to fight for entertainment and supplies, this is what you get for crossing us.” Haven’t seen the movie yet, but I guess that they didn’t focus on that aspect enough.
I kind of hate Harry Potter myself. The movies themselves are not that bad, I just have no desire to ever watch them or think about them ever again. This movie looks like hot garbage. Lawrence is a great actress, but, like you said it’s hard to take the characters seriously. Goofy hair/clothes, stupid names, and the premise is kind of retarded. I’m actually surprised it has gotten so many glowing reviews.
Finally, a review that nails the film perfectly. Thanks for this one Nick. Until now I thought I was the only one that had a few problems with it. The whole dog creature ending was bullshit and I found the whole games part to be very dull, which is odd because I was most looking forward to that part.
God damn those shaky cam shots. When will filmmakers learn how to properly use them? Greengrass learned, so can everyone else!
The Potter films pissed me off. They kept talking about how great a wizard Harry will be but he never seems to deliver. Plus, he never seemed terribly smart to boot. I didn’t bother to see the the last three or four “episodes.”
The kids will love it?? I teach 7th grade and my students hated it.
This review nails pretty much everything that I felt was wrong with the film. Having read the books, I wasn’t sure exactly how much someone who hadn’t read the books (like Nick, it seems) would take from it. How much was knowing what the hell was actually going on was clouding my judgement of the film? It seems it was as much of a mess for someone coming in blind as I thought it would be.
Our thoughts on the film are covered in our latest podcast episode:
http://www.simplysyndicated.com/nh-143-battle-royale-hunger-games/
I am thinking that the critic who wrote this review didn’t read the book. It’s a shame. The things in the movie that he says “don’t work” all of them are directly from the book. Ross stayed true to the book which was refreshing. I would suggest reading the book then giving your review. This is one movie that doesn’t stand alone from the literary effort and that’s ok. I would have thought the reviewer above would have know that. 🙂
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.